1 |
♠865
♥T85
♦Q64
♣AJ86
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♣K 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♠3 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 ♠A 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
|
2 |
♠AJ3
♥A9876
♦J
♣T542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣7/6 ♦4 |
EW: 3/2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ N -1 ♦A 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ E ♣K 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
200 0.00 2.00 3♣ N -2 ♠2 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
|
3 |
♠QJT
♥52
♦AJ97
♣KT62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5/6 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♠Q 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
100 1.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♦7 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
120 0.00 2.00 2N W ♦7 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
|
4 |
♠3
♥A9843
♦AKQJ2
♣T3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N S ♥J 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♥K 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ N -1 ♣7 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
|
5 |
♠AJ98653
♥853
♦4
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ ♦6 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
930 2.00 0.00 3♠* N +1 ♣A 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
150 1.00 1.00 4♣ E +1 ♠K 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
400 0.00 2.00 5♣ E ♠K 4-Cowen-Nelson vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
|
6 |
♠AT32
♥2
♦94
♣Q97654
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♦ W ♥2 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
130 1.00 1.00 2♦ W +2 ♥2 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥2 4-Cowen-Nelson vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
|
7 |
♠4
♥85
♦J93
♣AKQJT97
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5NT ♥5/6 ♠4 |
EW: 3/2♠ ♣1 ♦0 ♥5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3♣ N +2 ♥T 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
100 1.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♣8 4-Cowen-Nelson vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
100 0.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 ♠Q 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
|
8 |
♠KT5
♥AJ96
♦92
♣KJ52
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4/5♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♠A 4-Cowen-Nelson vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
450 1.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♠A 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ S +2 ♣9 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
|
9 |
♠-
♥95
♦AQ842
♣QJT754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ E ♦6 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.50 0.50 1♠ W +2 ♣Q 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♦A 4-Cowen-Nelson vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
10 |
♠AJ952
♥A7
♦QJ53
♣94
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N N ♦6 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
400 1.00 1.00 3N E -4 ♣Q 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
200 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♦A 4-Cowen-Nelson vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
11 |
♠JT4
♥AKT
♦AJ6
♣T652
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♣A 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♠2 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣J 4-Cowen-Nelson vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
12 |
♠T74
♥J983
♦987
♣532
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥3 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
120 1.00 1.00 2N W ♥3 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
400 0.00 2.00 3N W ♥3 4-Cowen-Nelson vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
13 |
♠KQ
♥J2
♦KQ54
♣J9742
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦3/2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ S ♣A 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 ♣A 1-Smith-Millslagle vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ W ♠K 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
|
14 |
♠J9
♥J7542
♦6432
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N W ♠J 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
150 1.00 1.00 1N W +2 ♥4 1-Smith-Millslagle vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
210 0.00 2.00 2N W +3 ♠J 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
|
15 |
♠JT5
♥KT2
♦T86432
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦4 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
50 1.00 1.00 6♣ W -1 ♦8 1-Smith-Millslagle vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
170 0.00 2.00 3♣ W +3 ♥2 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
|
16 |
♠AKJ432
♥T65
♦-
♣9763
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦2 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 2.00 0.00 4♠* N ♥A 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
150 1.00 1.00 4♦ E +1 ♣A 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
600 0.00 2.00 5♦ E ♠5 1-Smith-Millslagle vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
|
17 |
♠75432
♥K9
♦K94
♣A74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥1/3 ♠5 NT6/3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 ♠A 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠A 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♥4 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
|
18 |
♠75
♥A84
♦KQJ75
♣J73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠1 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ W +1 ♦K 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
170 0.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♦A 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
170 0.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♦4 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
|
19 |
♠T732
♥T976
♦7
♣JT98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠6 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♦7 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
750 0.00 2.00 5♦* E ♣A 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
20 |
♠9874
♥KQT
♦AT93
♣76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3/4♦ -/2♥ 4♠ 2/3NT ♣6/7 ♥6/8 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♣A 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ N ♠J 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Millslagle
90 0.00 2.00 2♣ N ♥6 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
21 |
♠JT
♥8732
♦AT8
♣K732
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♠A 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
130 1.00 1.00 4♦ E ♦2 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ E +2 ♥6 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
22 |
♠K53
♥AJ3
♦K8643
♣K9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♥5 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
120 1.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♥5 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Harken-Harken
150 0.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♥5 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
|
23 |
♠KJ54
♥KJ5
♦864
♣942
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.00 0.00 Pass Out 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♥3 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
24 |
♠Q975
♥Q9
♦JT2
♣KQ74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.00 1.00 3N E ♠6 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Harken-Harken
400 1.00 1.00 3N E ♥4 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Cowen-Nelson
400 1.00 1.00 3N E ♥4 7-Smith-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos
|
25 |
♠A
♥QT7
♦K963
♣J8743
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥A 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 6-Harken-Harken
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♥A 1-Smith-Millslagle vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣6 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
|
26 |
♠85
♥KT62
♦AKT94
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.50 0.50 2N E ♦J 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 6-Harken-Harken
120 1.50 0.50 2N E ♦2 1-Smith-Millslagle vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.00 2.00 2♦* N -1 ♠6 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
|
27 |
♠AQ85
♥A9
♦A542
♣832
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠4 1-Smith-Millslagle vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠2 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 6-Harken-Harken
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣3 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
|
28 |
♠AJT73
♥A
♦K62
♣J765
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣A 1-Smith-Millslagle vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♣A 8-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Smith-Feldstein
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♣A 2-Wasserstrom-Angelacos vs 6-Harken-Harken
|