1 |
♠9
♥753
♦K976
♣KQJT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N S ♠2 9-Maggipinto-Walker vs 7-Harken-Murdock
150 3.50 1.50 1N S +2 ♠6 8-Smyth-Benich vs 4-Cowen-Brown
150 3.50 1.50 2♣ S +3 ♣2 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ S +1 ♠A 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ S +1 ♥A 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Johnson-Keen
50 0.00 5.00 3♣ S -1 ♦A 6-Burk-Harken vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
2 |
♠AKQ87
♥T
♦A32
♣QJ73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♥8 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
650 4.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♣A 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Johnson-Keen
620 3.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥8 9-Maggipinto-Walker vs 7-Harken-Murdock
200 2.00 3.00 3♠ S +2 ♥8 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
170 1.00 4.00 4♦ S +2 ♥A 8-Smyth-Benich vs 4-Cowen-Brown
100 0.00 5.00 5♥* W -1 ♠A 6-Burk-Harken vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
3 |
♠AQ2
♥KJ9
♦AKQJ7
♣T5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♣7 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
430 4.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♣7 9-Maggipinto-Walker vs 7-Harken-Murdock
400 3.00 2.00 3N S ♣3 8-Smyth-Benich vs 4-Cowen-Brown
180 2.00 3.00 2N N +2 ♠3 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Johnson-Keen
150 1.00 4.00 2N N +1 ♣7 6-Burk-Harken vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
50 0.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♠9 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
4 |
♠A9654
♥JT82
♦8
♣A95
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 3♠ N ♦4 9-Maggipinto-Walker vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
140 4.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Smyth-Benich
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ N ♥6 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Cowen-Brown
100 2.00 3.00 3♦ W -1 ♥J 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
90 1.00 4.00 1N S ♠K 6-Burk-Harken vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
100 0.00 5.00 3♠ N -1 ♥6 7-Harken-Murdock vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
5 |
♠96
♥JT8
♦98753
♣J96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♣8 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
50 4.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♠A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Smyth-Benich
100 3.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 ♣K 6-Burk-Harken vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
110 1.50 3.50 3♣ W ♠9 9-Maggipinto-Walker vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
110 1.50 3.50 3♣ W ♦5 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Cowen-Brown
120 0.00 5.00 1N W +1 ♦9 7-Harken-Murdock vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
6 |
♠KQT74
♥J32
♦J3
♣QT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 3♠ N ♥5 9-Maggipinto-Walker vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
140 4.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♥9 7-Harken-Murdock vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ N ♦A 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Cowen-Brown
100 1.50 3.50 2N W -1 ♠K 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
100 1.50 3.50 1N W -1 ♠7 6-Burk-Harken vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
90 0.00 5.00 1N E ♦2 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Smyth-Benich
|
7 |
♠932
♥AT82
♦KJ8
♣A72
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦3/4 ♥5 ♠3 NT3/4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.50 0.50 2♠ E ♦2 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Burk-Harken
110 4.50 0.50 2♠ E ♣3 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
140 1.50 3.50 2♠ E +1 ♣3 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Smyth-Benich
140 1.50 3.50 2♠ E +1 ♣3 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
140 1.50 3.50 2♠ E +1 ♣3 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
140 1.50 3.50 1♠ E +2 ♦7 7-Harken-Murdock vs 4-Cowen-Brown
|
8 |
♠AT72
♥32
♦KT6
♣KQ43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♥ 2♠ 2/3NT ♦5/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦2 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
430 4.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♦3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Burk-Harken
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ S ♦9 7-Harken-Murdock vs 4-Cowen-Brown
200 2.00 3.00 3♥ S +2 ♦3 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
170 0.50 4.50 3♥ S +1 ♦5 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Smyth-Benich
170 0.50 4.50 3♥ S +1 ♦2 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
|
9 |
♠KT6
♥AJ74
♦A652
♣74
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 5♠* E -1 ♥5 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Burk-Harken
100 3.50 1.50 5♠ E -1 ♥2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Smyth-Benich
100 3.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♦J 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
620 1.00 4.00 4♠ E ♦J 7-Harken-Murdock vs 4-Cowen-Brown
620 1.00 4.00 4♠ E ♦J 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
620 1.00 4.00 4♠ E ♦8 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
|
10 |
♠JT96
♥Q632
♦J82
♣A9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 3♥ S ♠A 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Cowen-Brown
130 2.50 2.50 4♦ W ♠J 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 7-Harken-Murdock
130 2.50 2.50 4♣ E ♥K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
130 2.50 2.50 3♣ E +1 ♥A 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Keen
130 2.50 2.50 3♣ E +1 ♥A 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 6-Burk-Harken
950 0.00 5.00 5♣* W +1 ♠J 8-Smyth-Benich vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
|
11 |
♠9
♥T95
♦AT943
♣AJ87
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1/2♥ ♣6/7 ♦5 ♠4/5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥3 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 7-Harken-Murdock
100 4.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♥3 8-Smyth-Benich vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
50 2.00 3.00 4♠ E -1 ♦5 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
50 2.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 ♦5 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 6-Burk-Harken
50 2.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 ♣2 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Keen
110 0.00 5.00 2♠ E ♦5 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Cowen-Brown
|
12 |
♠54
♥974
♦AT72
♣QT94
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♥K 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 7-Harken-Murdock
100 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♥K 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 6-Burk-Harken
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦J 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Cowen-Brown
170 2.00 3.00 2♠ E +2 ♥A 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Keen
200 1.00 4.00 3♥* S -1 ♠3 8-Smyth-Benich vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ E ♥K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
|
13 |
♠Q
♥986
♦AT65
♣Q9763
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -4 ♠A 9-Maggipinto-Walker vs 6-Burk-Harken
200 3.50 1.50 3♥ E -2 ♠A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
200 3.50 1.50 3♥ E -2 ♠A 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♠A 7-Harken-Murdock vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ E ♠A 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 8-Smyth-Benich
170 0.00 5.00 3♥ E +1 ♠K 4-Cowen-Brown vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
|
14 |
♠8743
♥K83
♦865
♣Q97
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
120 3.50 1.50 2N W ♠8 9-Maggipinto-Walker vs 6-Burk-Harken
120 3.50 1.50 2N W ♣7 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 8-Smyth-Benich
400 1.00 4.00 3N W ♠8 4-Cowen-Brown vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
400 1.00 4.00 3N W ♠3 7-Harken-Murdock vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
400 1.00 4.00 3N W ♠3 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
|
15 |
♠J3
♥QJ7
♦AQ632
♣J42
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/3♣ 3/4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠8 9-Maggipinto-Walker vs 6-Burk-Harken
630 3.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♠6 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 8-Smyth-Benich
630 3.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♠6 7-Harken-Murdock vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
630 3.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♠6 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
600 1.00 4.00 3N S ♠6 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
100 0.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♠6 4-Cowen-Brown vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
|
16 |
♠KT95
♥A
♦AQJ63
♣JT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥7 8-Smyth-Benich vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣A 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣A 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Burk-Harken
450 3.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥4 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Harken-Murdock
50 0.50 4.50 5♠ N -1 ♣Q 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
50 0.50 4.50 6♣ S -1 ♠A 4-Cowen-Brown vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
|
17 |
♠-
♥KJ753
♦7
♣KQJ9852
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1/-NT ♠4 NT7/6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 1.00 3N S -1 ♦9 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
50 4.00 1.00 4♥ N -1 ♠5 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Harken-Murdock
50 4.00 1.00 5♣ N -1 ♠4 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Burk-Harken
100 1.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♠3 8-Smyth-Benich vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
100 1.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♥T 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
100 1.00 4.00 5♣ N -2 ♣5 4-Cowen-Brown vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
|
18 |
♠J843
♥AKJ82
♦A75
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.70 1.30 3♥ N ♦K 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 6-Burk-Harken
140 3.70 1.30 3♥ N ♣A 8-Smyth-Benich vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
140 3.70 1.30 2♥ N +1 ♣A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Harken-Murdock
50 1.30 3.70 2♠ E -1 ♥7 4-Cowen-Brown vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
100 0.10 4.90 4♥ N -1 ♣A 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
19 |
♠53
♥QJ4
♦7542
♣9843
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.00 0.00 3N E ♥5 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Murdock
660 2.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♠8 6-Burk-Harken vs 4-Cowen-Brown
660 2.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♠6 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 8-Smyth-Benich
660 2.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣6 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Johnson-Keen
660 2.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
660 2.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣2 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
|
20 |
♠J7
♥AQT4
♦A842
♣T32
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥4/5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♠J 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Murdock
100 3.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♠J 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
100 3.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♦2 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Johnson-Keen
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ W ♦2 6-Burk-Harken vs 4-Cowen-Brown
140 1.00 4.00 1♥ E +2 ♠6 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 8-Smyth-Benich
150 0.00 5.00 3♣ E +2 ♦3 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
|
21 |
♠Q
♥AT76
♦T9432
♣AQT
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ -/1♥ 5♠ 3/4NT ♦6 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ W +1 ♦T 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 8-Smyth-Benich
170 4.50 0.50 2♠ E +2 ♦5 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ W ♦T 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Johnson-Keen
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦Q 6-Burk-Harken vs 4-Cowen-Brown
450 0.50 4.50 4♠ W +1 ♥A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
450 0.50 4.50 4♠ W +1 ♦T 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Murdock
|
22 |
♠KQT52
♥QT983
♦-
♣T32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 4/3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3/4 ♥4 ♠3 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 0.00 4♠ N ♠3 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Keen
400 4.00 1.00 3N S ♥4 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 8-Smyth-Benich
120 3.00 2.00 2N S ♠6 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Cowen-Brown
110 2.00 3.00 2♣ S +1 ♠4 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
50 1.00 4.00 2N S -1 ♦5 6-Burk-Harken vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
150 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -3 ♠7 7-Harken-Murdock vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
|
23 |
♠AK
♥QT5
♦QJ43
♣K963
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠T 7-Harken-Murdock vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
650 4.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠4 6-Burk-Harken vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
650 4.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♦T 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
500 2.00 3.00 4♠* W -2 ♥5 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 8-Smyth-Benich
100 0.50 4.50 3♠ W -1 ♦3 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Keen
100 0.50 4.50 3♠ W -1 ♣3 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Cowen-Brown
|
24 |
♠T97
♥2
♦A52
♣K97642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦3 7-Harken-Murdock vs 5-Gamble-Reiss
50 3.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♥A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Cowen-Brown
50 3.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♣J 6-Burk-Harken vs 2-Wasserstrom-Burke
420 1.50 3.50 4♥ E ♣J 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Keen
420 1.50 3.50 4♥ E ♣J 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 8-Smyth-Benich
800 0.00 5.00 5♣* N -4 ♠K 3-Reuben-Llacera vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
|
25 |
♠Q873
♥A832
♦QJT
♣T6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 1.00 2N S ♠2 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
120 4.00 1.00 2N S ♠2 4-Cowen-Brown vs 1-Johnson-Keen
120 4.00 1.00 2N S ♣4 7-Harken-Murdock vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
50 1.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♠2 8-Smyth-Benich vs 6-Burk-Harken
50 1.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♠2 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
50 1.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♣4 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
26 |
♠A7
♥A75
♦8743
♣9543
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥5 8-Smyth-Benich vs 6-Burk-Harken
630 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥5 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
630 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♦3 7-Harken-Murdock vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
630 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♣3 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
630 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♣3 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
630 2.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠4 4-Cowen-Brown vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
27 |
♠KJ754
♥KQT82
♦A9
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣2 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥3 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 10-Modest-Shipman Jr
420 4.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣K 12-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 9-Maggipinto-Walker
420 4.00 1.00 4♥ N ♣K 2-Wasserstrom-Burke vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♥A 4-Cowen-Brown vs 1-Johnson-Keen
100 1.50 3.50 4♥ N -2 ♣Q 8-Smyth-Benich vs 6-Burk-Harken
200 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -4 ♣K 7-Harken-Murdock vs 3-Reuben-Llacera
|