1 |
♠T864
♥AJT84
♦Q53
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4/5♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6/5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 5♥* W -4 ♠8 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥K 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Johnson-Keen
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣8 7-Benz-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Simon
50 0.50 3.50 5♦ E -1 ♦A 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Schilling-Benich
50 0.50 3.50 3♣ E -1 ♦A 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 2-Hullman-Moller
|
2 |
♠74
♥AT65
♦AK98
♣KT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2/3 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠2 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 2-Hullman-Moller
200 2.50 1.50 2♥ S +3 ♦6 7-Benz-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Simon
200 2.50 1.50 2♥ S +3 ♣A 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Johnson-Keen
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ S +1 ♠2 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ S +1 ♠2 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Schilling-Benich
|
3 |
♠Q97
♥T54
♦K9753
♣T9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥A 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 2-Hullman-Moller
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♠6 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♠2 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Schilling-Benich
150 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -3 ♥A 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Johnson-Keen
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♠Q 7-Benz-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Simon
|
4 |
♠A2
♥Q965
♦AJ2
♣J654
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥3 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Hullman-Moller
600 3.00 1.00 3N N ♠T 1-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Sterling-Simon
180 2.00 2.00 2N S +2 ♥3 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ S ♠3 7-Benz-Harken vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♣3 8-Schilling-Benich vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|
5 |
♠AKT
♥92
♦874
♣KQJ85
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 1/2♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣1 ♦4 ♠5/4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 5♣ N +1 ♥3 7-Benz-Harken vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ N ♥5 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
300 1.50 2.50 5♥* W -2 ♠A 8-Schilling-Benich vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
300 1.50 2.50 5♥* E -2 ♠A 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Hullman-Moller
150 0.00 4.00 4♣ N +1 ♥3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Sterling-Simon
|
6 |
♠QT865
♥J53
♦Q8
♣943
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 5♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 5♦ E +1 ♠2 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Hullman-Moller
690 2.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♠2 8-Schilling-Benich vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
690 2.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♣2 7-Benz-Harken vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
690 2.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♣2 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
1370 0.00 4.00 6♦ E ♣A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Sterling-Simon
|
7 |
♠J76
♥K93
♦J4
♣KQ982
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♦J 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 3-Sterling-Simon
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ W +2 ♦J 2-Hullman-Moller vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ W +2 ♦J 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Johnson-Keen
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♦J 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♦A 8-Schilling-Benich vs 7-Benz-Harken
|
8 |
♠KQT4
♥52
♦T987
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♣3 8-Schilling-Benich vs 7-Benz-Harken
170 3.50 0.50 1♠ N +3 ♥T 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 3-Sterling-Simon
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ S ♥3 2-Hullman-Moller vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ S ♦A 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Johnson-Keen
50 0.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♦K 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
9 |
♠AT7654
♥2
♦K543
♣J5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠4/5 NT4/5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠8 2-Hullman-Moller vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠8 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 3-Sterling-Simon
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠8 8-Schilling-Benich vs 7-Benz-Harken
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠8 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠8 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
10 |
♠QT7
♥952
♦QT5
♣QJT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♣3 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Hullman-Moller
90 2.00 2.00 1N S ♣3 3-Sterling-Simon vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
90 2.00 2.00 1N S ♣3 7-Benz-Harken vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
90 2.00 2.00 1N S ♣3 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 8-Schilling-Benich
200 0.00 4.00 1N S -2 ♣3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
|
11 |
♠532
♥AQJ9
♦87
♣KQ63
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.00 0.00 2♠ W +4 ♦8 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♣K 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Hullman-Moller
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♠2 3-Sterling-Simon vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♥A 7-Benz-Harken vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♣K 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 8-Schilling-Benich
|
12 |
♠A65
♥T84
♦K62
♣QT84
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♣4 7-Benz-Harken vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♣4 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Hullman-Moller
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W ♥T 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 8-Schilling-Benich
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 ♥4 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 ♥4 3-Sterling-Simon vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
13 |
♠JT875
♥62
♦764
♣754
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠J 2-Hullman-Moller vs 7-Benz-Harken
630 3.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠J 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Sterling-Simon
630 3.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♥6 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
660 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♠7 1-Johnson-Keen vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
660 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♣4 8-Schilling-Benich vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
14 |
♠KQ64
♥AJ643
♦K
♣JT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♦2 8-Schilling-Benich vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
110 3.00 1.00 1♥ N +1 ♦8 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Sterling-Simon
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♥T 2-Hullman-Moller vs 7-Benz-Harken
120 1.00 3.00 2N E ♠J 1-Johnson-Keen vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
150 0.00 4.00 1N E +2 ♥T 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
|
15 |
♠QT863
♥A52
♦T94
♣96
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥8 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Sterling-Simon
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♠6 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♣9 2-Hullman-Moller vs 7-Benz-Harken
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 ♦9 8-Schilling-Benich vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♠3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
|
16 |
♠T95
♥AKJ6
♦QJ76
♣A9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 5/6♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣6/7 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠K 2-Hullman-Moller vs 1-Johnson-Keen
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠4 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠4 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♥8 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Benz-Harken
50 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♠6 3-Sterling-Simon vs 8-Schilling-Benich
|
17 |
♠J7
♥983
♦KQ74
♣9654
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥4 3-Sterling-Simon vs 8-Schilling-Benich
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥4 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Benz-Harken
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥4 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
50 1.00 3.00 3♣ E -1 ♠K 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 ♥4 2-Hullman-Moller vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
18 |
♠8
♥AJ95
♦KQJ7
♣AK82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4/2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠A 2-Hullman-Moller vs 1-Johnson-Keen
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♥7 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♦4 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Benz-Harken
500 1.00 3.00 4♠* W -3 ♣A 3-Sterling-Simon vs 8-Schilling-Benich
100 0.00 4.00 5♥ N -1 ♦8 9-Diola-Sabloff vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
|
19 |
♠QT8
♥JT7
♦KQJ7
♣954
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5/6 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1/-♣ 6♥ 6♠ 5NT ♣7/6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.25 0.75 4♠ W +2 ♦K 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 8-Schilling-Benich
680 3.25 0.75 4♥ E +2 ♦T 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
1430 0.75 3.25 6♠ W ♦5 3-Sterling-Simon vs 2-Hullman-Moller
1430 0.75 3.25 6♥ E ♠4 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Benz-Harken
|
20 |
♠K43
♥J6542
♦J8
♣732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♣K 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S ♣9 3-Sterling-Simon vs 2-Hullman-Moller
140 2.00 2.00 1♠ S +2 ♥K 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 8-Schilling-Benich
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S ♠8 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Benz-Harken
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 ♣9 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
21 |
♠AQT
♥AKQ8
♦K8
♣J652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 1/2♦ 2♥ 5/6♠ 2/6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♥4 3-Sterling-Simon vs 2-Hullman-Moller
650 2.50 1.50 5♠ S ♦5 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♦5 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 8-Schilling-Benich
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ S ♦5 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Benz-Harken
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ S ♦5 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
|
22 |
♠KJ4
♥Q
♦AJT52
♣A542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♦K 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Sterling-Simon
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♦K 2-Hullman-Moller vs 8-Schilling-Benich
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ S +2 ♦K 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Keen
200 1.50 2.50 5♥* E -1 ♦4 7-Benz-Harken vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ S ♥8 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
|
23 |
♠QT732
♥63
♦K9
♣8654
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 ♥6 7-Benz-Harken vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ W +1 ♥6 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♥6 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Sterling-Simon
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♥K 2-Hullman-Moller vs 8-Schilling-Benich
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♥K 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
24 |
♠KT4
♥QJ
♦QT93
♣K853
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣T 7-Benz-Harken vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥3 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 3-Sterling-Simon
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥3 2-Hullman-Moller vs 8-Schilling-Benich
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♦6 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-McDuff-Zinman
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♣T 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
25 |
♠98
♥A852
♦Q652
♣Q42
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ S ♣9 3-Sterling-Simon vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ S ♥K 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 2-Hullman-Moller
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ S +1 ♥K 8-Schilling-Benich vs 1-Johnson-Keen
50 0.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♣J 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Benz-Harken
50 0.50 3.50 3♦ S -1 ♣9 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|
26 |
♠K74
♥T96
♦J95
♣K865
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N S +3 ♠6 8-Schilling-Benich vs 1-Johnson-Keen
150 2.00 2.00 1N S +2 ♠6 3-Sterling-Simon vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
150 2.00 2.00 1N S +2 ♠6 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 2-Hullman-Moller
150 2.00 2.00 1N S +2 ♠6 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Benz-Harken
120 0.00 4.00 1N S +1 ♥3 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|
27 |
♠AQ
♥A872
♦98
♣98643
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 4NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♥9 10-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Benz-Harken
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦6 3-Sterling-Simon vs 9-Diola-Sabloff
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦6 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦6 6-McDuff-Zinman vs 2-Hullman-Moller
50 2.00 2.00 5♦ W -1 ♥A 8-Schilling-Benich vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|