| 1 |
♠K94
♥QJ
♦K82
♣AJT75
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 ♣2 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 3-Evenden-Keen
100 1.00 1.00 3♣* N -1 ♥A 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♣2 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
|
| 2 |
♠KJT42
♥-
♦A754
♣QT82
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♠ 1NT
♣6/7 ♦4/5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
930 2.00 0.00 3♥* S +1 ♠7 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 3-Evenden-Keen
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♦Q 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
100 0.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♦Q 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
|
| 3 |
♠AQJ984
♥9
♦9432
♣A6
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4/5♣ 6♦ 4♠ 1/3NT ♥5/6 |
EW: 1/-♥
♣2/1 ♦0 ♥7/6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥8 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 3-Evenden-Keen
170 1.00 1.00 4♦ S +2 ♥A 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♣K 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
| 4 |
♠7
♥KJ9853
♦T65
♣T32
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 4/3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦A 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♣K 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 3-Evenden-Keen
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦Q 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
|
| 5 |
♠Q7542
♥A9
♦QJ963
♣8
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3♦ N +2 ♠A 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ N ♥A 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 3-Evenden-Keen
110 0.00 2.00 3♣ E ♠K 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
| 6 |
♠J
♥8
♦KQJT752
♣KQJ2
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.50 0.50 4♦ N ♥Q 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Evenden-Keen
130 1.50 0.50 4♦ N ♥3 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♥A 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
|
| 7 |
♠J942
♥JT8
♦J985
♣JT
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3/4♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
| EW: ♣5/4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♣5 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
90 1.00 1.00 1♦ S +1 ♠6 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♠6 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Evenden-Keen
|
| 8 |
♠873
♥J764
♦83
♣KQ87
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♥A 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Evenden-Keen
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♥A 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ E +2 ♥A 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
|
| 9 |
♠A9
♥A732
♦AK6
♣QT53
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ N ♣A 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 ♣A 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Evenden-Keen
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 ♣A 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
| 10 |
♠AK863
♥5
♦KJT73
♣A8
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♠A 4-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Evenden-Keen
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♠A 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♣A 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
|
| 11 |
♠A8
♥KQ
♦T62
♣JT8432
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1/-NT
♣4 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥4 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
50 1.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 ♠J 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 ♥4 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Evenden-Keen
|
| 12 |
♠AKT542
♥4
♦Q653
♣Q5
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♣ 7♦ 4♥ 5♠ 7NT |
| EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥3 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1390 2.00 0.00 6♦ S +1 ♥K 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
620 1.00 1.00 5♣ S +1 ♠Q 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Evenden-Keen
100 0.00 2.00 6♠ N -1 ♥9 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 13 |
♠Q5
♥AJ96
♦8732
♣986
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 1♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2♦ S +3 ♠A 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
130 1.00 1.00 4♦ S ♠K 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Evenden-Keen
110 0.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 ♠K 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 14 |
♠AJ94
♥T92
♦QJT3
♣83
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥5 |
| EW: 1/-♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♥7/6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♥A 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♣2 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Evenden-Keen
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♦A 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 15 |
♠AQJ
♥AJT97
♦A9
♣432
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦Q 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Evenden-Keen
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦5 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦5 5-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 16 |
♠KT32
♥JT852
♦K97
♣J
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ -/1♦
♣6/7 ♦6/7 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣J 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♣J 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
620 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♣J 3-Evenden-Keen vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
|
| 17 |
♠A532
♥KT74
♦AQT9
♣6
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠4 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
50 0.50 1.50 6♥ S -1 ♠7 3-Evenden-Keen vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
50 0.50 1.50 6♥ S -1 ♣A 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
|
| 18 |
♠J875
♥973
♦K32
♣953
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 6♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 4♣ E +1 ♠A 3-Evenden-Keen vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
150 1.50 0.50 2♣ E +3 ♥6 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
170 0.00 2.00 3♣ W +3 ♦2 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
|
| 19 |
♠AQT73
♥KQT2
♦T
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 1.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♣5 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
490 1.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♥9 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
490 1.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♥7 3-Evenden-Keen vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
|
| 20 |
♠J7
♥KQ984
♦AT9
♣852
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♣K 3-Evenden-Keen vs 1-Nelson-Cowen
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ N ♣K 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ N ♣K 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 21 |
♠5
♥QJ5
♦75432
♣J743
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 7♣ 7♦ 6♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 2.00 0.00 3N W +4 ♥5 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
1020 0.50 1.50 6N E +1 ♠9 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
1020 0.50 1.50 6N E +1 ♠6 3-Evenden-Keen vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
| 22 |
♠76
♥T74
♦T863
♣T874
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 5♦ 2/1♥ 4♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥3 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
630 1.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♣3 3-Evenden-Keen vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
750 0.00 2.00 5♦* W ♥7 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
|
| 23 |
♠T3
♥JT82
♦T7
♣AT986
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.50 0.50 4♠ E +2 ♦Q 3-Evenden-Keen vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
680 1.50 0.50 4♠ E +2 ♦5 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
1440 0.00 2.00 6N W ♣A 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
|
| 24 |
♠A653
♥A7
♦AT
♣AT843
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3/4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5/4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 ♠Q 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
150 1.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♣2 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ N ♦5 3-Evenden-Keen vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
| 25 |
♠QJ53
♥6
♦J965
♣Q863
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6/5 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠Q 1-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Avenmarg-Suddards
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ W ♠3 6-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Burke-Wesolowski
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ E ♦8 3-Evenden-Keen vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|