1 |
♠KQ7
♥KJ3
♦J953
♣872
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N E ♠2 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 4-Benz-Spencer
150 1.50 1.50 2N E +1 ♠5 5-Smith-Smith vs 6-Belden-Smyth
150 1.50 1.50 2N E +1 ♠2 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♥4 3-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|
2 |
♠K962
♥J432
♦Q2
♣K52
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣2 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W ♠2 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 4-Benz-Spencer
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W ♠2 3-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W ♠2 5-Smith-Smith vs 6-Belden-Smyth
|
3 |
♠85
♥3
♦AKT9
♣AQT964
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 0.00 4N N +1 ♣7 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 4-Benz-Spencer
50 1.50 1.50 6♠ S -1 ♣8 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
50 1.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♠T 5-Smith-Smith vs 6-Belden-Smyth
100 0.00 3.00 6♠ S -2 ♠T 3-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|
4 |
♠952
♥AKQ982
♦2
♣J76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♥6 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 4-Benz-Spencer
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♥6 3-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♥6 5-Smith-Smith vs 6-Belden-Smyth
200 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 ♠6 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
|
5 |
♠T32
♥Q7
♦QJT3
♣T832
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♠Q 4-Benz-Spencer vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ E ♦6 6-Belden-Smyth vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 ♦6 3-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ E +2 ♠A 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
|
6 |
♠9543
♥Q764
♦T6
♣J93
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ N -2 ♦K 3-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Smith-Smith
110 2.00 1.00 2♦ W +1 ♣3 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
130 1.00 2.00 2♦ W +2 ♣J 4-Benz-Spencer vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
150 0.00 3.00 1♦ S -3 ♥2 6-Belden-Smyth vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|
7 |
♠J973
♥QT92
♦KJT3
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♣K 6-Belden-Smyth vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
100 2.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠2 4-Benz-Spencer vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
600 0.50 2.50 3N W ♠3 3-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Smith-Smith
600 0.50 2.50 3N E ♣2 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
|
8 |
♠A853
♥854
♦865
♣T87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2/1NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N E ♣5 3-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣A 4-Benz-Spencer vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣A 6-Belden-Smyth vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ E ♣A 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
|
9 |
♠86
♥AK83
♦JT2
♣J983
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠9 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
430 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠4 4-Benz-Spencer vs 6-Belden-Smyth
430 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♣T 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Johnson-Keen
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ N ♦8 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
|
10 |
♠AJ873
♥K62
♦KJT5
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠4 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Johnson-Keen
400 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -4 ♣4 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♣2 4-Benz-Spencer vs 6-Belden-Smyth
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ S ♣2 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
|
11 |
♠-
♥KJT862
♦QT98765
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 7♦ 6♥ 1♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦0 ♥1 ♠6 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1020 3.00 0.00 6N N +1 ♣4 4-Benz-Spencer vs 6-Belden-Smyth
990 2.00 1.00 6N S ♣J 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
980 1.00 2.00 6♥ S ♣J 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Johnson-Keen
520 0.00 3.00 3N S +4 ♣J 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
|
12 |
♠K9874
♥75
♦K8432
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ -/1♠ 5NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 1.00 6N W -1 ♥7 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
50 2.00 1.00 6♥ E -1 ♦5 4-Benz-Spencer vs 6-Belden-Smyth
50 2.00 1.00 6♣ E -1 ♦5 5-Smith-Smith vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
980 0.00 3.00 6♥ E ♠T 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Johnson-Keen
|
13 |
♠KQ984
♥T52
♦A3
♣A93
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4/5♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣K 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Benz-Spencer
210 2.00 1.00 2N S +3 ♥7 6-Belden-Smyth vs 3-Johnson-Keen
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♣K 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ N ♣K 5-Smith-Smith vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|
14 |
♠JT93
♥85
♦JT
♣AQ983
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3/4♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 5♥ E -1 ♠A 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ W ♥5 5-Smith-Smith vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
300 1.00 2.00 4♠* S -2 ♥T 6-Belden-Smyth vs 3-Johnson-Keen
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠K 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Benz-Spencer
|
15 |
♠QJT964
♥J754
♦7
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5/4♣ 4♦ 5/4♥ 2/1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 1.50 1.50 4N W ♠Q 6-Belden-Smyth vs 3-Johnson-Keen
430 1.50 1.50 4N W ♠Q 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Benz-Spencer
430 1.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♠Q 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
430 1.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♠Q 5-Smith-Smith vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|
16 |
♠K7542
♥AJ42
♦95
♣K3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥5/6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 2♠ N ♦T 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Benz-Spencer
110 2.50 0.50 2♠ N ♦2 6-Belden-Smyth vs 3-Johnson-Keen
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♠3 5-Smith-Smith vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
150 0.00 3.00 4♠ N -3 ♦2 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
|
17 |
♠AT
♥AQT8742
♦83
♣A9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ N ♦4 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Benz-Spencer
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣4 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 3-Johnson-Keen
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 ♦8 6-Belden-Smyth vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♠9 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
18 |
♠T63
♥K72
♦KT
♣JT864
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N W -3 ♦K 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 3-Johnson-Keen
200 2.00 1.00 2♦ S -2 ♠Q 6-Belden-Smyth vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
300 1.00 2.00 2♦ S -3 ♠Q 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Benz-Spencer
500 0.00 3.00 2♦* S -2 ♠Q 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
19 |
♠QT93
♥AT97
♦A8
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♦ -/1♠ ♣5/6 ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠6/7 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 ♥A 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 3-Johnson-Keen
50 1.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♠K 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Benz-Spencer
50 1.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♠K 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ S -2 ♥4 6-Belden-Smyth vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
|
20 |
♠Q82
♥865
♦AKQT
♣K53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♦2 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 3-Johnson-Keen
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ S ♠5 6-Belden-Smyth vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
90 1.00 2.00 1N N ♥J 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Smith-Smith
300 0.00 3.00 1N N -3 ♣2 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 4-Benz-Spencer
|
21 |
♠765
♥QT63
♦863
♣AKT
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ ♥7/6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 5♦* E -2 ♣J 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♥7 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♣5 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Belden-Smyth
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ E -2 ♠A 3-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Benz-Spencer
|
22 |
♠AKT653
♥QJ
♦J8
♣Q92
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♠2 3-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Benz-Spencer
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -2 ♥A 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 ♠A 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Smith
300 0.00 3.00 3♠* N -2 ♥A 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Belden-Smyth
|
23 |
♠A85
♥T9643
♦6
♣A632
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
730 3.00 0.00 3♠* S ♣K 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♣K 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Belden-Smyth
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ S ♣K 3-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Benz-Spencer
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠K 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
24 |
♠76
♥J7
♦J654
♣KQ743
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5/6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦A 3-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Benz-Spencer
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♣8 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♣8 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop vs 2-Slinger-Ottenberg
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ S +1 ♣8 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Belden-Smyth
|
25 |
♠AJ963
♥983
♦T8
♣Q62
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥J 4-Benz-Spencer vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♥2 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 6-Belden-Smyth
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ W ♦T 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Keen
230 0.00 3.00 3♥ W +3 ♣2 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|
26 |
♠A632
♥AQT5
♦Q87
♣43
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♠Q 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
90 1.50 1.50 1N W ♠6 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 6-Belden-Smyth
90 1.50 1.50 1N E ♦2 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Keen
100 0.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 ♣Q 4-Benz-Spencer vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
27 |
♠A6
♥AT975
♦Q53
♣742
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3♥ 2/1♠ ♦5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♥* W -2 ♦4 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 6-Belden-Smyth
150 2.00 1.00 3N E -3 ♦6 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
100 0.50 2.50 3N E -2 ♦6 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Keen
100 0.50 2.50 2N E -2 ♦6 4-Benz-Spencer vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
28 |
♠A87
♥AKT
♦QJT2
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3/4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠Q 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Johnson-Keen
630 2.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠Q 2-Slinger-Ottenberg vs 6-Belden-Smyth
100 1.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♠Q 4-Benz-Spencer vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♦8 8-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Hadley-Laborde Bishop
|