1 |
♠7
♥Q87642
♦3
♣T5432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1/-♦ 5♠ 4NT ♣5 ♦7/6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♠ N +1 ♥5 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
450 2.63 1.38 4♠ E +1 ♥5 7-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
480 0.75 3.25 4♠ E +2 ♦A 6-Evenden-Burk vs 5-Ford-Gunter
480 0.75 3.25 4♠ E +2 ♦3 10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
|
2 |
♠AKT64
♥2
♦KQT9
♣AQ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 3.88 0.13 6♠ N ♥4 7-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♦5 6-Evenden-Burk vs 5-Ford-Gunter
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♦5 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -1 ♥4 10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
|
3 |
♠73
♥QJT97542
♦-
♣632
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠6/5 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4NT ♣5 ♥3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.63 1.38 5♦ W -1 ♥Q 6-Evenden-Burk vs 5-Ford-Gunter
100 2.63 1.38 5♦ W -1 ♥Q 7-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 2.63 1.38 5♦ W -1 ♣6 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ W ♣6 10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
|
4 |
♠Q764
♥Q6
♦J643
♣762
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2/1♣ 6/5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.25 0.75 3N S ♥5 7-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Evenden-Burk
600 3.25 0.75 3N N ♣K 5-Ford-Gunter vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
100 1.38 2.63 4♠ S -1 ♣4 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
200 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 ♣4 1-Claussen-Gift vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
5 |
♠KJ4
♥AT974
♦74
♣A75
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 1N N +2 ♥3 7-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Evenden-Burk
130 2.63 1.38 4♣ N ♣9 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
100 1.38 2.63 3♣ N -1 ♠5 5-Ford-Gunter vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
200 0.13 3.88 3N N -2 ♦T 1-Claussen-Gift vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
6 |
♠J
♥KJ86
♦9654
♣KQ83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♥ E +1 ♦K 5-Ford-Gunter vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
200 2.63 1.38 2♠ E +3 ♦K 1-Claussen-Gift vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
500 1.38 2.63 5♦* S -3 ♥A 7-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Evenden-Burk
680 0.13 3.88 4♥ E +2 ♦K 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
|
7 |
♠52
♥K763
♦A
♣A87542
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 4♠ W -2 ♦A 6-Evenden-Burk vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
170 2.63 1.38 2♠ W +2 ♦A 10-Harken-Harken vs 1-Claussen-Gift
620 0.75 3.25 4♠ W ♦A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
620 0.75 3.25 4♠ W ♦A 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Ford-Gunter
|
8 |
♠AJT62
♥632
♦JT5
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♠ N ♦A 6-Evenden-Burk vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
100 2.63 1.38 5♦ E -2 ♦3 10-Harken-Harken vs 1-Claussen-Gift
110 1.38 2.63 3♦ W ♣A 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Ford-Gunter
130 0.13 3.88 3♦ E +1 ♠5 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
|
9 |
♠2
♥K763
♦QJ87
♣A632
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.25 0.75 3N S ♦4 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Ford-Gunter
400 3.25 0.75 3N S ♦4 10-Harken-Harken vs 1-Claussen-Gift
50 0.75 3.25 3N S -1 ♦4 6-Evenden-Burk vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
50 0.75 3.25 3N N -1 ♦T 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
|
10 |
♠Q852
♥A4
♦T2
♣AKQ62
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.88 0.13 3N S +1 ♥8 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
180 2.63 1.38 1N S +3 ♦8 10-Harken-Harken vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
100 0.75 3.25 3N S -1 ♠4 7-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
100 0.75 3.25 3N N -1 ♠4 1-Claussen-Gift vs 6-Evenden-Burk
|
11 |
♠K865
♥AK42
♦5
♣JT65
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 3.88 0.13 2♥* S ♣9 10-Harken-Harken vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
50 2.63 1.38 3♥ N -1 ♣9 7-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
100 1.38 2.63 4♥ N -2 ♣A 1-Claussen-Gift vs 6-Evenden-Burk
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ E ♣3 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
|
12 |
♠AKQ7
♥Q983
♦J4
♣J64
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.25 0.75 1N N +1 ♠2 10-Harken-Harken vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
120 3.25 0.75 1N N +1 ♥A 7-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
110 1.38 2.63 1♠ N +1 ♥A 1-Claussen-Gift vs 6-Evenden-Burk
200 0.13 3.88 1N S -2 ♣8 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
|
13 |
♠63
♥T832
♦AQT876
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠3 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -3 ♦3 1-Claussen-Gift vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
300 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -3 ♦3 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Ford-Gunter
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♣Q 4-Smith-Feldstein vs 6-Evenden-Burk
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E ♦K 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 ♣Q 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Zinman-Karter
|
14 |
♠874
♥74
♦A76432
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♦ ♣6/7 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♦* N -1 ♥Q 4-Smith-Feldstein vs 6-Evenden-Burk
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ W ♣K 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Zinman-Karter
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ E +1 ♦5 1-Claussen-Gift vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ E +2 ♦5 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Ford-Gunter
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♣A 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
|
15 |
♠K54
♥Q6
♦Q954
♣KQ86
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.25 0.75 1N E +1 ♠6 1-Claussen-Gift vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
120 3.25 0.75 1N E +1 ♠6 10-Harken-Harken vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.38 2.63 3♥ E ♠6 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 5-Ford-Gunter
420 0.13 3.88 4♥ E ♣K 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Zinman-Karter
|
16 |
♠A7
♥K7653
♦T7
♣AK86
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♠6 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
150 3.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♦3 5-Ford-Gunter vs 7-Zinman-Karter
50 2.00 2.00 2♣ N -1 ♦J 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Claussen-Gift
100 1.00 3.00 3♣ N -2 ♦J 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
120 0.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♥4 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Evenden-Burk
|
17 |
♠T852
♥KJT3
♦82
♣654
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠3/2 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ W ♦8 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Claussen-Gift
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♦8 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♦8 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Evenden-Burk
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♦8 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♦8 5-Ford-Gunter vs 7-Zinman-Karter
|
18 |
♠-
♥93
♦QJ98532
♣J876
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♦ N -1 ♥Q 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ E ♦A 9-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Evenden-Burk
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♦A 10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
300 1.00 3.00 1♠ S -3 ♥7 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Claussen-Gift
400 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -4 ♣A 5-Ford-Gunter vs 7-Zinman-Karter
|
19 |
♠KQ9875
♥A964
♦T7
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥J 6-Evenden-Burk vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦K 10-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ford-Gunter
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦2 4-Smith-Feldstein vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣9 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
430 0.00 4.00 3N S +1 ♣4 1-Claussen-Gift vs 7-Zinman-Karter
|
20 |
♠AK763
♥72
♦Q54
♣K93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♦2 6-Evenden-Burk vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
140 3.50 0.50 1♠ N +2 ♣8 4-Smith-Feldstein vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N ♣4 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
90 1.00 3.00 1N E ♥3 10-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ford-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♥Q 1-Claussen-Gift vs 7-Zinman-Karter
|
21 |
♠K93
♥KT6
♦J754
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♦6 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
630 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♦6 4-Smith-Feldstein vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
600 2.00 2.00 3N N ♣2 10-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ford-Gunter
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S ♠8 1-Claussen-Gift vs 7-Zinman-Karter
120 0.00 4.00 2N N ♦6 6-Evenden-Burk vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
|
22 |
♠AKJT9
♥T
♦J32
♣K972
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠* S -1 ♥A 7-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ N -2 ♦A 5-Ford-Gunter vs 1-Claussen-Gift
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W ♠A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
200 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +3 ♠A 4-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 10-Harken-Harken vs 6-Evenden-Burk
|
23 |
♠QJ64
♥AK5
♦QJ65
♣K7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥4 7-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
600 2.50 1.50 3N N ♥4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
600 2.50 1.50 3N N ♥4 4-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.50 3.50 6N* N -1 ♥J 10-Harken-Harken vs 6-Evenden-Burk
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♥J 5-Ford-Gunter vs 1-Claussen-Gift
|
24 |
♠KT32
♥AQ87
♦4
♣T984
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -2 ♦5 5-Ford-Gunter vs 1-Claussen-Gift
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 ♠Q 7-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 ♠Q 4-Smith-Feldstein vs 3-Burke-Wesolowski
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ E +1 ♠5 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Nelson-Cowen
400 0.00 4.00 3N W ♠2 10-Harken-Harken vs 6-Evenden-Burk
|
25 |
♠AQT987
♥T3
♦Q9
♣KT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3N E -2 ♠2 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 1-Claussen-Gift
150 2.63 1.38 3♦ W +2 ♠A 5-Ford-Gunter vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
170 1.38 2.63 3♦ W +3 ♥T 10-Harken-Harken vs 7-Zinman-Karter
300 0.13 3.88 4♠* N -2 ♦3 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
|
26 |
♠Q63
♥Q5
♦T87
♣AQ875
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: -/1♣ 2/3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1/2NT ♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2N E -1 ♠2 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
150 2.63 1.38 1N W +2 ♣7 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 1-Claussen-Gift
630 0.75 3.25 3N W +1 ♣7 5-Ford-Gunter vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
630 0.75 3.25 3N W +1 ♣7 10-Harken-Harken vs 7-Zinman-Karter
|
27 |
♠AQ
♥AKT2
♦T53
♣9654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.63 1.38 1N S ♠8 3-Burke-Wesolowski vs 9-Sterling-Llacera
90 2.63 1.38 1N S ♠8 8-Nelson-Cowen vs 1-Claussen-Gift
90 2.63 1.38 1N S ♥8 10-Harken-Harken vs 7-Zinman-Karter
90 0.13 3.88 1N W ♥A 5-Ford-Gunter vs 4-Smith-Feldstein
|