1 |
♠KJ8764
♥A2
♦96
♣T95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 2♠ N +3 ♠A 5-Hill-Smyth vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♥3 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♦Q 12-Simon-Black vs 1-Johnson-Keen
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ N ♥5 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 4-Harken-Burk
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ N ♥3 9-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Burke-Reuben
100 0.00 5.00 3N E -2 ♠Q 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
|
2 |
♠74
♥A2
♦A9632
♣QJ97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 3/2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 1.00 3N S ♣6 5-Hill-Smyth vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
600 4.00 1.00 3N S ♣6 9-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Burke-Reuben
600 4.00 1.00 3N S ♣6 12-Simon-Black vs 1-Johnson-Keen
500 2.00 3.00 3♥* E -3 ♠Q 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
130 1.00 4.00 3♦ S +1 ♣6 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ S ♣6 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 4-Harken-Burk
|
3 |
♠A76
♥A6432
♦Q
♣QJ98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ N ♠K 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ N ♠K 5-Hill-Smyth vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
400 3.00 2.00 3N N ♣2 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 4-Harken-Burk
100 1.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♠K 9-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Burke-Reuben
100 1.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♠Q 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♠K 12-Simon-Black vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
4 |
♠JT75
♥A4
♦J982
♣Q92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3/4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦2 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Harken-Burk
100 2.00 3.00 3N W -1 ♣2 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
100 2.00 3.00 3N W -1 ♣2 9-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Hill-Smyth
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♦6 7-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♣A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
100 2.00 3.00 4♦ W -1 ♣2 12-Simon-Black vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
|
5 |
♠T432
♥J84
♦K542
♣QT
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦0 ♥1 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 7♦ 6♥ 5♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 0.00 5♦ W +1 ♠2 12-Simon-Black vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
430 4.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠2 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Harken-Burk
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♣4 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♣2 9-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Hill-Smyth
490 1.00 4.00 3N E +3 ♣4 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
520 0.00 5.00 3N E +4 ♦J 7-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
|
6 |
♠Q7
♥A654
♦QJ2
♣A985
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.50 0.50 3♣ N +1 ♦4 12-Simon-Black vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
130 4.50 0.50 3♣ N +1 ♣6 9-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Hill-Smyth
100 3.00 2.00 4♦ W -1 ♣A 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
110 1.50 3.50 3♦ E ♥Q 7-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
110 1.50 3.50 3♦ E ♥Q 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Harken-Burk
130 0.00 5.00 3♦ E +1 ♥Q 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
|
7 |
♠J753
♥7
♦AJ943
♣T64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♥7 7-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Burk
100 4.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♥7 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Hill-Smyth
100 2.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♠A 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
100 2.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♦8 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
200 0.50 4.50 3♥ S -2 ♠A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
200 0.50 4.50 3♥ S -2 ♦8 12-Simon-Black vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
|
8 |
♠K65
♥K8642
♦532
♣74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♦ S ♠T 7-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Burk
100 4.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦2 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
50 3.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♦2 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Hill-Smyth
50 2.00 3.00 4♦ S -1 ♠Q 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
100 1.00 4.00 5♦ S -2 ♠5 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
300 0.00 5.00 4♦* S -2 ♠Q 12-Simon-Black vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
|
9 |
♠K542
♥953
♦32
♣QJ72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
420 4.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥A 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
420 4.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥A 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
170 1.50 3.50 3♠ N +1 ♥A 7-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Burk
170 1.50 3.50 3♠ N +1 ♥A 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Hill-Smyth
50 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 12-Simon-Black vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
|
10 |
♠T9
♥A42
♦86
♣AT8764
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 3♠ E ♦K 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 5-Hill-Smyth
230 4.00 1.00 2♠ E +4 ♦K 12-Simon-Black vs 4-Harken-Burk
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦K 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 7-Burke-Reuben
620 2.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦9 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
650 0.50 4.50 4♠ E +1 ♦K 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Keen
650 0.50 4.50 4♠ E +1 ♣5 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
11 |
♠A974
♥874
♦KJ74
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♥4 12-Simon-Black vs 4-Harken-Burk
50 4.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦4 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 7-Burke-Reuben
180 3.00 2.00 2N W +2 ♦4 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
400 2.00 3.00 3N E ♠3 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Keen
430 1.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♦5 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
460 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♦4 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 5-Hill-Smyth
|
12 |
♠95
♥AJ984
♦T4
♣AT82
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2/1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.00 0.00 4♥ S ♣6 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Keen
170 4.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 ♦3 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 7-Burke-Reuben
140 3.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♣K 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
120 1.50 3.50 1N S +1 ♣6 12-Simon-Black vs 4-Harken-Burk
120 1.50 3.50 1N N +1 ♣3 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ W -2 ♦T 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 5-Hill-Smyth
|
13 |
♠AJ9
♥QT52
♦AJT
♣K84
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♥K 12-Simon-Black vs 5-Hill-Smyth
660 4.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♥6 7-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
660 4.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♥4 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
600 2.00 3.00 3N N ♥5 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
210 0.50 4.50 2N N +3 ♥A 9-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
210 0.50 4.50 2N N +3 ♥6 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
|
14 |
♠K7653
♥A72
♦QT62
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 4♣ E -1 ♥K 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
50 4.50 0.50 4♣ E -1 ♦J 7-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
110 2.00 3.00 3♦ E ♥K 9-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
110 2.00 3.00 3♣ E ♦J 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
110 2.00 3.00 3♣ E ♦J 12-Simon-Black vs 5-Hill-Smyth
130 0.00 5.00 3♣ E +1 ♦J 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
|
15 |
♠J732
♥KT85
♦A5
♣K98
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠K 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
140 4.00 1.00 3♥ S ♠K 9-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
110 3.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 ♣3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
130 1.00 4.00 4♦ W ♥5 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
130 1.00 4.00 4♦ W ♥3 7-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
130 1.00 4.00 3♦ W +1 ♥5 12-Simon-Black vs 5-Hill-Smyth
|
16 |
♠K63
♥T73
♦43
♣K9852
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ ♦4/3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 3♥ W ♠3 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
150 4.00 1.00 5♣ N -3 ♣7 5-Hill-Smyth vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
170 3.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♠3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Burke-Reuben
200 2.00 3.00 2♥ W +3 ♠3 12-Simon-Black vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♦4 4-Harken-Burk vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
800 0.00 5.00 5♣* N -4 ♥A 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
|
17 |
♠93
♥T975
♦AJ53
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2/1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♥5 12-Simon-Black vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
50 3.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♠2 4-Harken-Burk vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
50 3.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♥4 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Burke-Reuben
90 1.50 3.50 1N E ♠2 5-Hill-Smyth vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
90 1.50 3.50 1N E ♥4 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
150 0.00 5.00 1N E +2 ♥4 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
|
18 |
♠Q64
♥A432
♦AKJT
♣J2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
890 5.00 0.00 2N* S +1 ♠A 5-Hill-Smyth vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
150 4.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♠2 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Burke-Reuben
100 3.00 2.00 1N W -2 ♦A 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
90 2.00 3.00 1N N ♦4 12-Simon-Black vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
50 0.50 4.50 1N W -1 ♦A 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
50 0.50 4.50 2♦ E -1 ♠7 4-Harken-Burk vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
19 |
♠J96
♥JT872
♦K2
♣A32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3/4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.50 0.50 3N W ♥J 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
600 4.50 0.50 3N W ♥7 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 4-Harken-Burk
630 1.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♥J 5-Hill-Smyth vs 1-Johnson-Keen
630 1.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♥J 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
630 1.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♥J 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
630 1.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♥7 12-Simon-Black vs 7-Burke-Reuben
|
20 |
♠J9
♥7653
♦T854
♣654
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/3 ♦4/3 ♥6/4 ♠6/5 NT6/3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 2N W -2 ♠J 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
200 4.50 0.50 2N W -2 ♠J 5-Hill-Smyth vs 1-Johnson-Keen
100 3.00 2.00 1♠ S -1 ♥A 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
150 1.50 3.50 2N W +1 ♥7 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 4-Harken-Burk
150 1.50 3.50 2N W +1 ♥3 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
800 0.00 5.00 3♠* S -3 ♥A 12-Simon-Black vs 7-Burke-Reuben
|
21 |
♠KQ94
♥T82
♦T85
♣T75
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♥6 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 4-Harken-Burk
100 4.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 ♠K 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
90 1.50 3.50 1N S ♥6 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
90 1.50 3.50 1N S ♥6 5-Hill-Smyth vs 1-Johnson-Keen
90 1.50 3.50 1N S ♥6 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
90 1.50 3.50 1N S ♥6 12-Simon-Black vs 7-Burke-Reuben
|
22 |
♠AKQ7
♥QT7542
♦85
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N E -4 ♥6 12-Simon-Black vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
170 4.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♣3 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
120 3.00 2.00 2N W ♠A 7-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Hill-Smyth
130 1.50 3.50 4♣ E ♥8 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Keen
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ E +1 ♥8 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
710 0.00 5.00 4♣* E ♥8 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Burk
|
23 |
♠Q932
♥KT7
♦KT82
♣96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦4/5 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -4 ♣9 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
140 3.50 1.50 3♠ N ♣A 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Keen
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♣4 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Burk
90 1.50 3.50 1N W ♠2 7-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Hill-Smyth
90 1.50 3.50 2♣ E ♠A 12-Simon-Black vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
100 0.00 5.00 3♠ N -1 ♣A 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
|
24 |
♠9
♥KQ73
♦QJ53
♣JT52
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♥K 11-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Johnson-Keen
50 4.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥K 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Burk
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ W ♣J 7-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Hill-Smyth
140 2.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♥K 3-Gelfand-Smith vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
140 2.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♥K 12-Simon-Black vs 8-Bruno-Cramblet
170 0.00 5.00 3♠ W +1 ♥K 6-Pender-Wasserstrom vs 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom
|
25 |
♠AJ
♥K43
♦AJ865
♣Q93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2/3♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♥3 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
100 4.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♣8 4-Harken-Burk vs 1-Johnson-Keen
100 2.00 3.00 1N N -2 ♣K 12-Simon-Black vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
100 2.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♣8 5-Hill-Smyth vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
100 2.00 3.00 2♥ N -2 ♦7 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
110 0.00 5.00 3♣ E ♥5 7-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
|
26 |
♠Q92
♥KQ94
♦KQ7
♣K86
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 3♥ S ♠A 5-Hill-Smyth vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♠K 12-Simon-Black vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
120 3.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♠4 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
90 2.00 3.00 1N N ♠8 7-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
110 0.50 4.50 2♠ E ♥A 4-Harken-Burk vs 1-Johnson-Keen
110 0.50 4.50 2♠ E ♦2 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
27 |
♠AJ8
♥K73
♦76542
♣K2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠6 5-Hill-Smyth vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
430 4.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠3 4-Harken-Burk vs 1-Johnson-Keen
430 4.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠3 7-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Gelfand-Smith
400 1.50 3.50 3N S ♠2 12-Simon-Black vs 9-Modest-Shipman Jr
400 1.50 3.50 3N S ♣3 8-Bruno-Cramblet vs 6-Pender-Wasserstrom
50 0.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♥2 2-Hullman-Wasserstrom vs 11-Wesolowski-Henderson
|