1 |
♠Q8742
♥954
♦95
♣AJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1/-♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♠7/6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 4♦ E -1 ♥Q 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
130 3.50 1.50 3♦ E +1 ♥Q 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
130 3.50 1.50 3♦ E +1 ♥Q 6-Smith-Smith vs 10-Benz-Harken
150 1.50 3.50 3♥ S -3 ♦Q 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Johnson-Keen
150 1.50 3.50 3♦ E +2 ♥Q 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 4-Schilling-Benich
400 0.00 5.00 5♦ E ♥Q 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Burke-Reuben
|
2 |
♠KJT7532
♥T7
♦97
♣J5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4/3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 5♦ W -1 ♥T 6-Smith-Smith vs 10-Benz-Harken
50 4.50 0.50 4♦ W -1 ♣J 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ W ♥T 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Johnson-Keen
200 2.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♦A 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Burke-Reuben
500 1.00 4.00 3♠ N -5 ♦5 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 4-Schilling-Benich
550 0.00 5.00 5♦* W ♥T 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
|
3 |
♠K94
♥AQ654
♦3
♣A975
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♣4 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Johnson-Keen
430 4.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♦J 6-Smith-Smith vs 10-Benz-Harken
400 2.00 3.00 3N S ♣4 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
400 2.00 3.00 3N N ♦J 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
400 2.00 3.00 3N N ♦J 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 4-Schilling-Benich
150 0.00 5.00 3N N -3 ♦7 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Burke-Reuben
|
4 |
♠JT973
♥J72
♦AQJ
♣T2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 1♦ W -3 ♠J 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
200 4.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♠J 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
100 3.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♠K 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 4-Schilling-Benich
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ N ♥4 7-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Benz-Harken
110 0.50 4.50 2♥ W ♠J 6-Smith-Smith vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
110 0.50 4.50 2♥ W ♣T 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
|
5 |
♠K82
♥T953
♦K86
♣QT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2/1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♥4 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 4-Schilling-Benich
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ S ♠Q 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ S ♣2 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ S +1 ♥6 7-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Benz-Harken
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ S +1 ♦3 6-Smith-Smith vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
50 0.00 5.00 3♦ E -1 ♥Q 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
|
6 |
♠54
♥J732
♦KT
♣JT862
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♣J 7-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Benz-Harken
140 4.00 1.00 1♠ W +2 ♣J 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 4-Schilling-Benich
170 3.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♥2 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
600 2.00 3.00 3N E ♠J 6-Smith-Smith vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ W ♣6 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
630 0.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♥6 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
|
7 |
♠J73
♥KQJT5
♦3
♣T952
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 4/3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥2 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
140 3.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥2 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥2 7-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Schilling-Benich
140 3.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥2 10-Benz-Harken vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ N ♦K 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Smith-Smith
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ S -1 ♥2 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
|
8 |
♠T9
♥642
♦K982
♣8765
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 6♥ 6♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♠ W +1 ♠T 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Smith-Smith
480 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♦2 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
480 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♦2 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
480 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♦2 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
480 2.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♠7 10-Benz-Harken vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
480 2.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♠5 7-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Schilling-Benich
|
9 |
♠T987
♥AQ8652
♦K2
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥3/4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 4♣ W -2 ♠T 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
170 4.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♦Q 7-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Schilling-Benich
140 3.00 2.00 3♥ N ♣3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Smith-Smith
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ N ♠3 10-Benz-Harken vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
100 1.00 4.00 3♦ E -1 ♠A 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
50 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -1 ♣3 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
|
10 |
♠T8763
♥J
♦AQJ
♣AQJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 6♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 5.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♥A 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Burke-Reuben
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥3 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
650 3.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥3 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Schilling-Benich
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ N ♥Q 10-Benz-Harken vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ N ♥3 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Johnson-Keen
140 0.00 5.00 1♥ W +2 ♥J 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 6-Smith-Smith
|
11 |
♠J954
♥872
♦A974
♣A8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠A 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 6-Smith-Smith
400 4.00 1.00 3N S ♦2 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Schilling-Benich
50 2.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦2 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Burke-Reuben
50 2.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♦2 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Johnson-Keen
50 2.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♦T 10-Benz-Harken vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
150 0.00 5.00 3N S -3 ♦2 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
|
12 |
♠KQ9
♥Q9
♦63
♣AKQJT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.70 1.30 3♣ N ♦A 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Burke-Reuben
110 3.70 1.30 3♣ N ♦A 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 6-Smith-Smith
110 3.70 1.30 2♣ N +1 ♦A 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Johnson-Keen
170 0.70 4.30 3♥ E +1 ♣9 10-Benz-Harken vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
170 0.70 4.30 3♥ E +1 ♣9 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Schilling-Benich
|
13 |
♠KQ975
♥Q53
♦KJ7
♣A4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 5/4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥6 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
660 4.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠3 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Smith-Smith
600 2.00 3.00 3N N ♥4 7-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
600 2.00 3.00 3N N ♥4 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
600 2.00 3.00 5♦ S ♠J 4-Schilling-Benich vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
130 0.00 5.00 2♦ N +2 ♣J 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Benz-Harken
|
14 |
♠K62
♥QJT43
♦Q96
♣T7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠T 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Smith-Smith
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣4 4-Schilling-Benich vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
400 3.00 2.00 3N S ♦5 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
170 2.00 3.00 2♥ S +2 ♠T 7-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
150 1.00 4.00 2N S +1 ♠3 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
50 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -1 ♣4 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Benz-Harken
|
15 |
♠7
♥K97642
♦3
♣K9743
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠3 |
EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.00 0.00 5♣ S ♠3 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
100 4.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♦A 4-Schilling-Benich vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♦A 7-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
200 1.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♠4 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Smith-Smith
200 1.00 4.00 3♥ N -2 ♣J 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Benz-Harken
200 1.00 4.00 5♦* S -1 ♠T 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
|
16 |
♠KJT53
♥2
♦AK42
♣743
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 1.00 3N S ♣5 4-Schilling-Benich vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
400 4.00 1.00 3N N ♣2 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Burke-Reuben
400 4.00 1.00 3N N ♣2 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Smith-Smith
50 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♣4 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
50 1.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♣2 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 10-Benz-Harken
150 0.00 5.00 3N S -3 ♣T 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
|
17 |
♠K
♥KT97
♦53
♣A96432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 4♠ 2/-NT ♦5/3 ♥4 NT8/6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣0 ♠3 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.70 1.30 4♠ S ♠5 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 10-Benz-Harken
420 3.70 1.30 4♠ S ♠5 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
420 3.70 1.30 4♠ S ♠5 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Smith-Smith
140 1.30 3.70 3♠ S ♠4 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Burke-Reuben
140 0.10 4.90 3♥ W ♠K 4-Schilling-Benich vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
|
18 |
♠K8
♥AJ5
♦AJT84
♣T93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.90 0.10 3♣ W -1 ♣3 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Burke-Reuben
110 3.70 1.30 2♠ W ♣T 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Smith-Smith
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♦7 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
170 1.30 3.70 2♥ E +2 ♦6 4-Schilling-Benich vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
200 0.10 4.90 2♦ N -2 ♠6 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 10-Benz-Harken
|
19 |
♠J2
♥KQ9432
♦J9874
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1/-♠ ♠7/6 NT6 |
EW: -/1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 3N S -2 ♦6 6-Smith-Smith vs 4-Schilling-Benich
100 4.50 0.50 3♣ S -2 ♠3 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
150 2.50 2.50 3N S -3 ♠4 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
150 2.50 2.50 3♣ S -3 ♦6 10-Benz-Harken vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
200 1.00 4.00 3N S -4 ♦6 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Burke-Reuben
1400 0.00 5.00 5♣* S -6 ♦6 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
20 |
♠KQT
♥J7
♦9
♣KT87632
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2/3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ -/1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♦ W -1 ♠K 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Burke-Reuben
130 3.50 1.50 4♦ W ♠K 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
130 3.50 1.50 4♦ W ♥J 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 1-Johnson-Keen
600 1.50 3.50 3N W ♣8 10-Benz-Harken vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
600 1.50 3.50 3N E ♥3 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
660 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♣8 6-Smith-Smith vs 4-Schilling-Benich
|
21 |
♠6
♥AQT54
♦4
♣AT9642
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6/7♦ 6♥ 1/2♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥1 ♠4/5 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 5.00 0.00 6N S +1 ♠5 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 1-Johnson-Keen
1370 4.00 1.00 6♦ S ♠J 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
200 3.00 2.00 3♥ N +2 ♣K 10-Benz-Harken vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
190 2.00 3.00 4♦ S +3 ♣5 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Burke-Reuben
100 1.00 4.00 6♥ N -1 ♣K 6-Smith-Smith vs 4-Schilling-Benich
300 0.00 5.00 6♥ N -3 ♣K 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
|
22 |
♠AKT
♥A832
♦T32
♣QT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣3 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠Q 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
200 4.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♦5 6-Smith-Smith vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
110 2.50 2.50 3♦ W ♥A 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 1-Johnson-Keen
110 2.50 2.50 2♦ W +1 ♠A 10-Benz-Harken vs 4-Schilling-Benich
130 1.00 4.00 3♦ W +1 ♠A 7-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
620 0.00 5.00 4♠ E ♥4 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
|
23 |
♠AT7
♥65
♦J432
♣AK62
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥A 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 1-Johnson-Keen
620 3.00 2.00 4♠ S ♥A 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
620 3.00 2.00 4♠ S ♥A 6-Smith-Smith vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
620 3.00 2.00 4♠ S ♥A 7-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
400 1.00 4.00 5♥ W -4 ♣A 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
140 0.00 5.00 3♠ S ♦A 10-Benz-Harken vs 4-Schilling-Benich
|
24 |
♠A8
♥984
♦AJ73
♣A974
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♠4 11-Peterson-Slinger vs 1-Johnson-Keen
110 3.50 1.50 3♣ S ♠4 10-Benz-Harken vs 4-Schilling-Benich
110 3.50 1.50 3♣ S ♦2 3-Andrews-Andrews vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
50 2.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 ♥8 6-Smith-Smith vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
50 1.00 4.00 4♣ S -1 ♥5 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
90 0.00 5.00 2♦ W ♠A 7-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom
|
25 |
♠76
♥A9762
♦A
♣KT864
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣6 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
100 4.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♥7 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
50 2.50 2.50 3♣ N -1 ♦4 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 6-Smith-Smith
50 2.50 2.50 3♣ N -1 ♦2 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 10-Benz-Harken
120 1.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♣6 4-Schilling-Benich vs 1-Johnson-Keen
150 0.00 5.00 2♥ N -3 ♦2 7-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
|
26 |
♠QJ2
♥J5
♦J53
♣87432
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 1.00 4♠ W ♦3 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
620 4.00 1.00 4♥ E ♦A 4-Schilling-Benich vs 1-Johnson-Keen
620 4.00 1.00 4♥ E ♦A 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 10-Benz-Harken
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦A 7-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦A 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 6-Smith-Smith
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦K 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
|
27 |
♠K83
♥AK5
♦J962
♣964
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ -/1♠ ♦6 ♥5 ♠6/7 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠* E -1 ♥T 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 11-Peterson-Slinger
50 4.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♦A 7-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Andrews-Andrews
90 3.00 2.00 1N W ♦2 5-Faircrest-Wasserstrom vs 10-Benz-Harken
100 1.50 3.50 2♥* S -1 ♣8 4-Schilling-Benich vs 1-Johnson-Keen
100 1.50 3.50 2♥ S -2 ♣8 12-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
110 0.00 5.00 2♠ E ♥A 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 6-Smith-Smith
|