1 |
♠KQT
♥AK9
♦T752
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ E ♥8 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Smith-McDuff
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ E ♥2 6-Gunter-Albright vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ E ♣4 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
150 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -3 ♠A 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
2 |
♠A98654
♥A984
♦7
♣85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ ♦7/6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♥4 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Harken-Harken
100 2.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 ♠7 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Smith-McDuff
50 1.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 ♠7 6-Gunter-Albright vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
120 0.00 3.00 1N E +1 ♦5 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
3 |
♠QT98432
♥5
♦J75
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 4♣ E +1 ♠6 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Harken-Harken
660 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠T 6-Gunter-Albright vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
660 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠8 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
660 1.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠6 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Smith-McDuff
|
4 |
♠J8
♥AQ6432
♦A6
♣T97
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3/2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.00 0.00 2♥* W -3 ♦A 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 3-Harken-Harken
300 2.00 1.00 2♥ W -3 ♦A 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Smith-McDuff
200 1.00 2.00 2♥ W -2 ♦A 6-Gunter-Albright vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ E -1 ♥6 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
5 |
♠AKJ5
♥QJ542
♦J85
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N N ♠T 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
100 1.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♣T 1-Smith-McDuff vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
100 1.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♣8 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 6-Gunter-Albright
400 0.00 3.00 2N S -4 ♣T 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
6 |
♠AKT5
♥K63
♦Q763
♣53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 5N N +1 ♦2 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 6-Gunter-Albright
460 2.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♦2 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
430 1.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♦J 1-Smith-McDuff vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.00 3.00 6N N -2 ♦J 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
7 |
♠AJ2
♥Q98
♦J4
♣JT872
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♥A 1-Smith-McDuff vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥A 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 6-Gunter-Albright
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♣J 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♣J 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
8 |
♠JT742
♥K6532
♦73
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1/2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 3♦ S ♥7 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 6-Gunter-Albright
50 2.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♦7 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
50 0.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥J 1-Smith-McDuff vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
50 0.50 2.50 4♦ S -1 ♠K 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
9 |
♠AQJ32
♥J5
♦532
♣T62
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠5/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3♥ W -1 ♣T 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Harken-Harken
90 1.50 1.50 2♦ W ♥J 6-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
110 0.17 2.83 2♦ W +1 ♣6 1-Smith-McDuff vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
|
10 |
♠KT84
♥JT2
♦AKQ76
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ S +1 ♦5 1-Smith-McDuff vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
100 1.50 1.50 2♦ N -1 ♠A 6-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.17 2.83 4♠ S -2 ♦J 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
11 |
♠AK
♥AK42
♦KT9752
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ -/1♥ 3NT ♣6 ♥6/7 ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.83 0.17 4♠* W -3 ♥A 1-Smith-McDuff vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
130 1.50 1.50 4♦ N ♣K 6-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.17 2.83 4♦* N -1 ♣K 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
12 |
♠42
♥Q2
♦KQJ9762
♣A7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥4 ♠3 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4/5 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 4♥ E -3 ♦A 1-Smith-McDuff vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
130 0.83 2.17 4♦ N ♥A 6-Gunter-Albright vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
130 0.83 2.17 4♦ N ♥A 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
13 |
♠K5
♥T8
♦AJT654
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♣4 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
650 1.00 2.00 5♥ S ♣8 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
650 1.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♣9 3-Harken-Harken vs 6-Gunter-Albright
650 1.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♣5 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-McDuff
|
14 |
♠5
♥T984
♦KJ74
♣9854
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5/6 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♣T 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
50 2.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣7 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
50 2.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♠5 3-Harken-Harken vs 6-Gunter-Albright
150 0.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♠T 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-McDuff
|
15 |
♠AKT5
♥K83
♦954
♣A95
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 6♦ 6♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥Q 3-Harken-Harken vs 6-Gunter-Albright
230 2.00 1.00 3♥ E +3 ♦6 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
400 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -4 ♣3 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
480 0.00 3.00 5♥ E +1 ♦6 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-McDuff
|
16 |
♠K32
♥74
♦T75
♣T8764
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4/5 ♦4 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♠K 3-Harken-Harken vs 6-Gunter-Albright
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ W +2 ♥4 7-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
620 0.50 2.50 4♥ W ♠K 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
620 0.50 2.50 4♥ W ♥4 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 1-Smith-McDuff
|
17 |
♠973
♥Q4
♦JT98
♣9873
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4/3♣ 5/4♦ 5♥ 5/4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 5♦ W -2 ♥Q 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
50 1.50 1.50 6♥ E -1 ♣4 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
450 0.17 2.83 4♥ E +1 ♣4 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
|
18 |
♠AK94
♥Q74
♦K8754
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2/1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.17 0.83 2♥ E +1 ♥3 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
140 2.17 0.83 2♥ E +1 ♦J 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
170 0.17 2.83 2♥ E +2 ♦J 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
19 |
♠KQT98
♥QJ872
♦T9
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.83 0.17 4♥ W -4 ♣2 4-Burke-Wesolowski vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ N -2 ♦A 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
660 0.17 2.83 3N E +2 ♥K 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
20 |
♠QT987653
♥-
♦Q7
♣K97
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 4NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.95 1.65 4♥ E -1 ♠J 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
650 1.65 1.95 5♥ E ♠J 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Avenmarg-Chase
|
21 |
♠AK43
♥AQ4
♦865
♣963
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3NT ♣4 ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1/2♠ ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 3♥ S +1 ♣A 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
110 0.83 2.17 3♦ E ♥8 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Smith-McDuff
110 0.83 2.17 3♦ E ♣Q 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Gunter-Albright
|
22 |
♠54
♥4
♦KQ64
♣AKT932
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1/3NT ♥4/5 ♠3 |
EW: 2♥ 4♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.17 0.83 3♣ N ♥2 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
110 2.17 0.83 2♣ N +1 ♥T 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Smith-McDuff
50 0.17 2.83 3♦ N -1 ♥2 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Gunter-Albright
|
23 |
♠KQ4
♥A9654
♦J873
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 5♦ E -1 ♥8 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
100 2.17 0.83 5♦ E -1 ♣3 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Gunter-Albright
130 0.17 2.83 4♦ E ♥J 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Smith-McDuff
|
24 |
♠T95
♥QT9854
♦Q53
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ S +1 ♥A 2-Smith-Feldstein vs 7-Johnson-Reuben
90 1.50 1.50 2♣ S ♥A 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Smith-McDuff
50 0.17 2.83 3♣ S -1 ♥A 8-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 6-Gunter-Albright
|
25 |
♠Q754
♥KJT8
♦A65
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3N E -1 ♥Q 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-McDuff
120 1.50 1.50 2N E ♣6 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
630 0.17 2.83 3N E +1 ♣4 6-Gunter-Albright vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
26 |
♠J732
♥K52
♦Q86
♣AT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 3N E -2 ♦2 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-McDuff
600 1.50 1.50 3N W ♦6 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
630 0.17 2.83 3N E +1 ♦3 6-Gunter-Albright vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
|
27 |
♠T643
♥984
♦2
♣J9654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 7♦ 7♥ 5♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 2.83 0.17 3N E +4 ♣2 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
940 1.50 1.50 6♦ E +1 ♣2 6-Gunter-Albright vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
1020 0.17 2.83 6N E +1 ♣K 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-McDuff
|
28 |
♠3
♥K984
♦KQ43
♣AK43
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♥ 1/2NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.17 0.83 2♥ E -1 ♦7 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-McDuff
50 2.17 0.83 2♥ E -1 ♣8 6-Gunter-Albright vs 2-Smith-Feldstein
100 0.17 2.83 2N N -1 ♥3 5-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|