| 1 |
♠AJ98
♥T6
♦AT9732
♣2
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4/3♦ 3/2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♥A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Burk-Beiers
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♦Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Suddards-Roy
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N +1 ♣7 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Nelson-Loops
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥A 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
| 2 |
♠AKT3
♥QT4
♦KT8
♣Q95
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 1♠ 2/-NT
♦4 ♥5 NT8/6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1/2♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N ♦5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Burk-Beiers
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♣J 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Suddards-Roy
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♣A 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ E ♣A 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
110 0.00 4.00 2♦ E +1 ♣A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Nelson-Loops
|
| 3 |
♠AJT653
♥T863
♦-
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦4 |
| EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N ♣5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Nelson-Loops
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♥A 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♣5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Suddards-Roy
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -2 ♥A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Burk-Beiers
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ E ♠4 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
| 4 |
♠9542
♥Q9753
♦75
♣A8
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 6♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 4.00 0.00 6♠ S ♥A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Burk-Beiers
720 3.00 1.00 3N S +4 ♥4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Suddards-Roy
680 1.50 2.50 4♠ S +2 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Nelson-Loops
680 1.50 2.50 4♠ S +2 ♥K 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
660 0.00 4.00 3N N +2 ♣7 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 5 |
♠KJT3
♥63
♦9542
♣Q62
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♥6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♠J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W ♠J 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Suddards-Roy
150 1.00 3.00 1N W +2 ♠3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Burk-Beiers
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +2 ♠J 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Nelson-Loops
|
| 6 |
♠75
♥A2
♦AKQ954
♣K62
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣1 ♦0 ♥1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
420 3.50 0.50 5♣ S +1 ♥9 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Suddards-Roy
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ N +1 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ N +1 ♠A 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Nelson-Loops
150 1.00 3.00 2♦ N +3 ♠A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Burk-Beiers
|
| 7 |
♠Q542
♥3
♦Q874
♣KQ97
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 ♥3 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Suddards-Roy
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦3 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Nelson-Loops
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W ♥3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ W ♥3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Burk-Beiers
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
| 8 |
♠T962
♥QT5
♦974
♣J73
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT3/2 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♣2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
120 3.00 1.00 2N E ♣6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Burk-Beiers
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ W +1 ♣3 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Nelson-Loops
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ W +2 ♣3 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Suddards-Roy
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♠T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
| 9 |
♠T9632
♥JT86
♦3
♣K73
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ ♣5/4 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2/1♣ 3/2♦ 3/1♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♥3 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Burk-Beiers
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♦2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Roy
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♦2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Nelson-Loops
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -2 ♦5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♥A 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 10 |
♠KJ62
♥JT942
♦QJ5
♣J
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♣A 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Burk-Beiers
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +3 ♥6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S ♣A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Nelson-Loops
90 0.50 3.50 1N E ♦3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Roy
90 0.50 3.50 1♣ E +1 ♠4 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 11 |
♠83
♥KJ6532
♦Q5
♣K73
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6/5 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 5♥ N ♦A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣9 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Roy
400 1.00 3.00 3N S ♦6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Nelson-Loops
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♦4 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Burk-Beiers
|
| 12 |
♠864
♥QJT5
♦KT84
♣J4
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♥ 6♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♦Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Nelson-Loops
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +3 ♣J 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Burk-Beiers
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠T 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♦Q 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Suddards-Roy
|
| 13 |
♠T3
♥7
♦98543
♣AT862
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4/5 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 2/1♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 2♦* W -3 ♥7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Burk-Beiers
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♦A 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Suddards-Roy
120 2.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♠T 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Nelson-Loops
150 1.00 3.00 1N W +2 ♠T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 4.00 2♣ S -2 ♠5 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
| 14 |
♠976
♥AK52
♦J6543
♣A
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♥ S +2 ♠Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Burk-Beiers
110 3.00 1.00 1♦ N +2 ♦7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Nelson-Loops
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♦Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♦2 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
80 0.00 4.00 1♠ W ♣A 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Suddards-Roy
|
| 15 |
♠J543
♥K7
♦93
♣KT975
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♣ S +1 ♦A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.50 0.50 2♣ S +1 ♦A 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Suddards-Roy
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Burk-Beiers
100 1.00 3.00 4♣ S -1 ♦A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Nelson-Loops
200 0.00 4.00 4♣ S -2 ♦A 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
| 16 |
♠JT2
♥92
♦83
♣KQJ754
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦0 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♣ N -2 ♠7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Burk-Beiers
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +3 ♣K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
600 2.00 2.00 5♦ W ♣K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Nelson-Loops
630 1.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♣K 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Suddards-Roy
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♣K 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
| 17 |
♠A987543
♥Q9
♦K6
♣T8
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥4 |
| EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥A 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Nelson-Loops
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♦Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Suddards-Roy
100 0.50 3.50 5♥ W -2 ♠A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 3.50 5♦ E -2 ♣A 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Burk-Beiers
|
| 18 |
♠9862
♥T752
♦-
♣KQJT7
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT1 |
| EW: 1♣ 6♦ 2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 0.50 4N E +1 ♥4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Suddards-Roy
460 3.50 0.50 3N E +2 ♣8 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♥4 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Nelson-Loops
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♥4 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Burk-Beiers
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♥4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 19 |
♠96432
♥A862
♦A654
♣-
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S +1 ♥4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Suddards-Roy
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♥K 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Burk-Beiers
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♣J 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Nelson-Loops
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ E -1 ♦K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ E -1 ♦K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 20 |
♠Q87
♥Q652
♦84
♣QT92
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♠2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
100 3.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♦3 4-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Burk-Beiers
120 2.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♥2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Suddards-Roy
150 1.00 3.00 1N W +2 ♥2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
380 0.00 4.00 1N* W +1 ♥2 3-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Nelson-Loops
|