1 |
♠AK953
♥AT52
♦-
♣KJT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N S ♣3 6-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Johnson-Loops
170 3.50 1.50 2♥ N +2 ♦A 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
170 3.50 1.50 2♥ N +2 ♣9 8-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
140 1.50 3.50 2♥ N +1 ♦A 4-Harken-Burk vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
140 1.50 3.50 2♥ N +1 ♦A 5-Benich-Benich vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
50 0.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♠2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
|
2 |
♠J
♥T94
♦875
♣T97653
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4/3♣ 5/4♦ 4/3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 6N E -1 ♠A 5-Benich-Benich vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♠3 4-Harken-Burk vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♠3 6-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Johnson-Loops
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♠3 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♥J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
990 0.00 5.00 6N E ♠A 8-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
|
3 |
♠84
♥KJ642
♦T9
♣Q983
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣5 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
150 3.50 1.50 4♦ W +1 ♠8 6-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Johnson-Loops
150 3.50 1.50 2♦ W +3 ♠8 5-Benich-Benich vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♥9 4-Harken-Burk vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
620 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♣5 8-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
650 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 ♥5 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
|
4 |
♠K92
♥AK54
♦A62
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2/-♠ 2NT ♠8/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 1.50 3N N ♥Q 4-Harken-Burk vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
600 3.50 1.50 3N N ♥Q 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
600 3.50 1.50 3N N ♦5 5-Benich-Benich vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
600 3.50 1.50 3N N ♦5 6-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Johnson-Loops
120 1.00 4.00 2N N ♦5 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
100 0.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♦5 8-Grant-Nelson vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
|
5 |
♠J7
♥KJ86
♦A963
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ S ♣6 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 4-Jones-Henderson
PASS 3.50 1.50 Pass Out 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
PASS 3.50 1.50 Pass Out 8-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
200 1.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♣A 5-Benich-Benich vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
200 1.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♣5 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 2-Smith-Smith
200 1.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♣2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
|
6 |
♠763
♥T985
♦A87
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
400 3.00 2.00 3N S ♠5 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 2-Smith-Smith
400 3.00 2.00 3N S ♠5 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 4-Jones-Henderson
400 3.00 2.00 3N N ♠2 8-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
130 1.00 4.00 4♣ S ♦T 5-Benich-Benich vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
90 0.00 5.00 1N S ♠J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
|
7 |
♠Q82
♥73
♦K97
♣QT983
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 ♠A 8-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
200 4.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♦7 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
100 2.50 2.50 3N W -1 ♣T 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 2-Smith-Smith
100 2.50 2.50 3♥ E -1 ♦A 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 4-Jones-Henderson
90 1.00 4.00 1N W ♣8 5-Benich-Benich vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
600 0.00 5.00 3N W ♣3 6-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
|
8 |
♠A9
♥K974
♦K
♣J87643
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5/4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5/2NT ♣6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -4 ♣6 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
110 4.00 1.00 2♦ E +1 ♣6 6-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ E ♦4 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 2-Smith-Smith
150 2.00 3.00 2♦ E +3 ♥3 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 4-Jones-Henderson
430 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♣9 5-Benich-Benich vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
470 0.00 5.00 3♦* E ♣K 8-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
|
9 |
♠AT4
♥AKJ4
♦75
♣KT32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♦ W ♥A 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
130 4.00 1.00 3♦ E +1 ♠6 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ W +1 ♦7 6-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
140 2.50 2.50 1♥ W +2 ♦7 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 3-Johnson-Loops
170 1.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♣5 8-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
200 0.00 5.00 2♠ E +3 ♥2 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 2-Smith-Smith
|
10 |
♠Q76
♥AKQ7652
♦J3
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 4♣ E -2 ♥J 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 2-Smith-Smith
100 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 6-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
100 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 8-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
100 3.00 2.00 4♦ E -1 ♥A 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 3-Johnson-Loops
200 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
300 0.00 5.00 4♣ S -3 ♥J 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
|
11 |
♠95
♥Q52
♦KT753
♣K42
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♦5 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
120 4.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♣5 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
150 3.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♣5 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 3-Johnson-Loops
400 2.00 3.00 3N W ♥2 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 2-Smith-Smith
430 0.50 4.50 3N W +1 ♦3 6-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
430 0.50 4.50 3N E +1 ♣5 8-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
|
12 |
♠T954
♥J53
♦K53
♣KT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 5♠ E -1 ♣A 8-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
50 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♠Q 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
130 2.50 2.50 3♦ W +1 ♣2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
130 2.50 2.50 2♦ W +2 ♣2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
150 1.00 4.00 3♦ W +2 ♣2 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 2-Smith-Smith
260 0.00 5.00 3♠ E +4 ♥7 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
13 |
♠J86
♥J9532
♦83
♣A84
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1/2♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♦5/6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♠8 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
100 4.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 ♦A 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
200 2.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 ♦A 4-Harken-Burk vs 4-Jones-Henderson
200 2.50 2.50 3♥ N -2 ♦5 8-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
300 1.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
800 0.00 5.00 4♥* N -3 ♦5 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 2-Smith-Smith
|
14 |
♠AJT643
♥AQ2
♦K7
♣92
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.00 0.00 3♠* N +1 ♣A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
100 3.50 1.50 3♣ E -2 ♠8 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
100 3.50 1.50 3♣ E -2 ♠8 8-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
80 2.00 3.00 1♠ N ♣A 4-Harken-Burk vs 4-Jones-Henderson
50 1.00 4.00 3N W -1 ♠T 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
100 0.00 5.00 3♠ N -2 ♣A 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 2-Smith-Smith
|
15 |
♠KT42
♥Q6
♦AK94
♣K43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 ♦K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
100 4.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 ♠7 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ W ♦A 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 2-Smith-Smith
110 2.50 2.50 2♥ E ♣T 4-Harken-Burk vs 4-Jones-Henderson
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♦A 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
200 0.00 5.00 1N N -2 ♥7 8-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
16 |
♠AQ
♥JT93
♦JT86
♣985
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠8 4-Harken-Burk vs 4-Jones-Henderson
110 4.00 1.00 2♣ W +1 ♥J 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
120 2.50 2.50 2N E ♠4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
120 2.50 2.50 2N E ♥2 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
130 1.00 4.00 3♣ W +1 ♥J 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 2-Smith-Smith
630 0.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♠2 8-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
17 |
♠Q32
♥Q7
♦J87652
♣AK
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ S ♦K 8-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Smith-Smith
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣Q 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Jones-Henderson
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ N ♦K 4-Harken-Burk vs 3-Johnson-Loops
170 0.50 4.50 3♠ S +1 ♥J 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
170 0.50 4.50 3♠ S +1 ♣Q 5-Benich-Benich vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
|
18 |
♠6
♥T543
♦7654
♣J987
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.50 0.50 3N E -3 ♠A 5-Benich-Benich vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
150 4.50 0.50 3♥ E -3 ♣A 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
50 2.00 3.00 3♦ E -1 ♠A 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
50 2.00 3.00 3♦ E -1 ♣A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Jones-Henderson
50 2.00 3.00 3♦ E -1 ♣A 4-Harken-Burk vs 3-Johnson-Loops
300 0.00 5.00 2♠ S -3 ♦8 8-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Smith-Smith
|
19 |
♠QJ53
♥QT985
♦Q2
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♠A 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
50 3.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♠9 5-Benich-Benich vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
50 3.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 ♦9 8-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Smith-Smith
80 2.00 3.00 1♠ E ♥A 4-Harken-Burk vs 3-Johnson-Loops
100 1.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♠A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Jones-Henderson
150 0.00 5.00 2♦ S -3 ♠9 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
|
20 |
♠J3
♥AK
♦QJ8
♣T97543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.30 0.70 3♣ N +2 ♠A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Jones-Henderson
150 4.30 0.70 2♣ N +3 ♣2 4-Harken-Burk vs 3-Johnson-Loops
130 2.50 2.50 4♣ N ♥9 8-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Smith-Smith
100 1.30 3.70 2N S -1 ♠6 5-Benich-Benich vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
200 0.10 4.90 3N N -2 ♥4 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
|
21 |
♠-
♥J875
♦863
♣J97643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♥ 6♠ 6NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♣4 6-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
480 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♦K 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
480 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♦K 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
480 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♦K 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Smith-Smith
480 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♦K 5-Benich-Benich vs 4-Jones-Henderson
980 0.00 5.00 6♠ E ♦K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
22 |
♠QJ9532
♥AK63
♦J
♣Q7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1♥ ♦1 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 6♦ -/1♠ 2/3NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 0.00 2N W ♠Q 6-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
150 4.00 1.00 4♦ W +1 ♥A 5-Benich-Benich vs 4-Jones-Henderson
170 3.00 2.00 4♦ W +2 ♥A 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Smith-Smith
620 2.00 3.00 5♦ W +1 ♥A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Johnson-Loops
1100 1.00 4.00 5♥* N -5 ♣4 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
1370 0.00 5.00 6♦ W ♥A 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
|
23 |
♠JT652
♥-
♦T96543
♣Q3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ ♦3/4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♣ W -1 ♠A 5-Benich-Benich vs 4-Jones-Henderson
80 3.00 2.00 1♥ S ♣5 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Johnson-Loops
80 3.00 2.00 1♥ S ♣5 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
80 3.00 2.00 1♥ S ♣4 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
100 0.50 4.50 3♥ S -1 ♠3 6-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
100 0.50 4.50 2♥ S -1 ♣8 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Smith-Smith
|
24 |
♠T94
♥J8543
♦3
♣KT43
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 6♠ E -3 ♣A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Johnson-Loops
100 4.00 1.00 6♠ E -2 ♣A 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
230 3.00 2.00 3♠ E +3 ♦3 6-Winham-Murdock vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♠7 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♥2 5-Benich-Benich vs 4-Jones-Henderson
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣A 4-Harken-Burk vs 2-Smith-Smith
|
25 |
♠-
♥KQ975
♦AJ9874
♣83
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 1/2NT ♣6 ♠3 |
EW: 1♣ 3/4♠ ♦2 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠A 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
400 3.50 1.50 3N S ♠5 4-Harken-Burk vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
400 3.50 1.50 3N S ♠5 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
150 1.50 3.50 4♦ N +1 ♠2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
150 1.50 3.50 3♦ N +2 ♠7 5-Benich-Benich vs 3-Johnson-Loops
50 0.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♠5 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Jones-Henderson
|
26 |
♠AK965
♥AQJ4
♦A98
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4/3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2/3 ♠3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣3 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Jones-Henderson
630 4.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♦2 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
600 3.00 2.00 3N S ♥7 4-Harken-Burk vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
200 2.00 3.00 3♠ N +2 ♠4 5-Benich-Benich vs 3-Johnson-Loops
100 0.50 4.50 6N N -1 ♠4 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
100 0.50 4.50 3N S -1 ♣4 6-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
|
27 |
♠A976
♥K73
♦T6
♣KQT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠4 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣5 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Jones-Henderson
50 3.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♣5 6-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
50 3.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♣5 5-Benich-Benich vs 3-Johnson-Loops
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ E ♣5 4-Harken-Burk vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
140 1.00 4.00 3♠ E ♣5 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
150 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -3 ♠8 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
|
28 |
♠AKQ7
♥J53
♦QT96
♣A9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 3♠ S ♦A 5-Benich-Benich vs 3-Johnson-Loops
140 4.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥6 2-Reimnitz-Reimnitz vs 4-Jones-Henderson
100 3.00 2.00 3♥ W -2 ♠K 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
50 2.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♠A 6-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
100 1.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♥T 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
110 0.00 5.00 2♥ W ♠A 4-Harken-Burk vs 1-Davidson-Suddards
|
29 |
♠AK4
♥J8
♦AJ432
♣J52
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.00 0.00 3N N ♠3 5-Benich-Benich vs 2-Smith-Smith
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ S ♣K 8-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ S +1 ♣A 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ S +1 ♣A 6-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Jones-Henderson
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ S +1 ♣A 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
200 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -2 ♣A 4-Harken-Burk vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
|
30 |
♠J8
♥962
♦AKQ742
♣95
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3/2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥4 4-Harken-Burk vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
460 4.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♣3 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
430 3.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣8 5-Benich-Benich vs 2-Smith-Smith
170 2.00 3.00 2♠ S +2 ♣8 6-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Jones-Henderson
150 1.00 4.00 3♦ N +2 ♥A 8-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
50 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -1 ♣8 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
|
31 |
♠KQJT92
♥Q
♦972
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ -/1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♥6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣4 4-Harken-Burk vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♠6 8-Grant-Nelson vs 8-Hasey-Oppenheimer
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♥7 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♦6 5-Benich-Benich vs 2-Smith-Smith
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♦6 6-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Jones-Henderson
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♣3 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
|
32 |
♠A964
♥2
♦J82
♣Q8732
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5/4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 4♥ W -1 ♥2 6-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Jones-Henderson
170 3.70 1.30 3♥ W +1 ♦2 7-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 6-Blake-McGranahan
620 1.90 3.10 4♥ W ♥2 4-Harken-Burk vs 7-Zinman-Osborn
620 1.90 3.10 4♥ W ♣3 5-Benich-Benich vs 2-Smith-Smith
650 0.10 4.90 4♥ W +1 ♣8 3-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 5-Gelfand-Slinger
|