1 |
♠A86
♥K
♦A87653
♣852
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠4 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Nelson-Loops
400 3.00 1.00 3N S ♣3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
190 2.00 2.00 4♦ N +3 ♠4 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ S +1 ♠Q 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Burk-Harken
50 0.00 4.00 3♣ E -1 ♦2 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
|
2 |
♠KT65
♥J84
♦7
♣A7532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/2♠ ♦2 ♥0 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 7♥ 4NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ E +1 ♣Q 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
480 3.00 1.00 5♥ E +1 ♣Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Nelson-Loops
510 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +3 ♦2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Burk-Harken
980 1.00 3.00 6♥ E ♣Q 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
1010 0.00 4.00 6♥ E +1 ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
3 |
♠K9
♥J8
♦AKT93
♣A873
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♥A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Burk-Harken
130 3.00 1.00 2♦ N +2 ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N +1 ♥A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Nelson-Loops
90 0.50 3.50 1N N ♥A 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
90 0.50 3.50 2♣ N ♥A 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
4 |
♠752
♥J
♦A9752
♣QJT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠Q 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.50 2.50 3♥ E +2 ♦Q 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
200 1.50 2.50 4♦ S -2 ♥4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Nelson-Loops
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦6 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Burk-Harken
|
5 |
♠K963
♥T43
♦J987
♣A7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4/5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♥6 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Nelson-Loops
660 3.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
630 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ N ♥9 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Burk-Harken
110 0.00 4.00 2♣ S +1 ♠2 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
6 |
♠KQJ83
♥-
♦AJ952
♣T76
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 ♣5 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Nelson-Loops
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 ♠6 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ N ♣A 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Burk-Harken
670 0.00 4.00 2♥* E ♣Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠KQT5
♥AT954
♦876
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 6♠ 2NT ♦4 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠0 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +3 ♥K 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Nelson-Loops
710 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +3 ♣5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♠2 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Burk-Harken
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♥K 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
680 1.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
|
8 |
♠T94
♥AKJ952
♦AQJ
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 4.00 0.00 5♠ S +2 ♠3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Nelson-Loops
480 1.50 2.50 5♠ S +1 ♣4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ S +2 ♣Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
480 1.50 2.50 5♥ N +1 ♦6 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +2 ♣A 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Burk-Harken
|
9 |
♠T7643
♥T
♦953
♣Q864
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 5/4♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♥T 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Nelson-Loops
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♦9 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♦3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♦3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦8 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 4-Burk-Harken
|
10 |
♠K96
♥K5
♦KQJ952
♣Q4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 6♣* W -2 ♦J 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 4-Burk-Harken
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♣9 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Nelson-Loops
100 2.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 ♣T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
500 1.00 3.00 5♦* N -2 ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♣9 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
11 |
♠862
♥KT2
♦K85
♣J843
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♦2 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 4-Burk-Harken
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -2 ♥J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -2 ♥9 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -2 ♥7 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Nelson-Loops
|
12 |
♠JT85
♥AK53
♦T6
♣Q62
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ S ♦7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
50 3.00 1.00 1N W -1 ♠J 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Nelson-Loops
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
120 0.50 3.50 1N W +1 ♥A 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 4-Burk-Harken
120 0.50 3.50 1N W +1 ♥3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠A
♥Q52
♦KT
♣AJ98753
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ N +1 ♥8 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 3-Nelson-Loops
100 1.50 2.50 5♣ N -1 ♥J 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 5♣ N -1 ♥T 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
100 1.50 2.50 5♣ N -1 ♥7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.50 2.50 5♣ N -1 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Burk-Harken
|
14 |
♠KT5
♥A2
♦984
♣KJ865
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Burk-Harken
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ N -2 ♦5 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E ♥8 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 3-Nelson-Loops
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ W ♥A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.00 4.00 2N W +1 ♣6 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
|
15 |
♠J9432
♥AQ98
♦KJ4
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Burk-Harken
600 3.00 1.00 3N S ♣7 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♠A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
120 1.00 3.00 2N S ♥3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.00 4.00 2♣ N -2 ♠A 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 3-Nelson-Loops
|
16 |
♠Q76
♥Q85
♦KJ4
♣AJT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥0 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 7♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
600 3.00 1.00 3N E ♣2 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Burk-Harken
630 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♦3 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 3-Nelson-Loops
680 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +2 ♣K 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
|
17 |
♠QJ6
♥KT86
♦KJ6
♣A94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT3/2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4/5♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 1♣ N -2 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Nelson-Loops
120 3.00 1.00 2N E ♣7 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
150 2.00 2.00 1♣ N -3 ♠A 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +3 ♣T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Burk-Harken
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
18 |
♠Q7
♥K632
♦AKJT
♣K87
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ 2/1NT ♣5 ♥4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠2/3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥7 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
100 3.00 1.00 5♥ E -2 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Nelson-Loops
100 2.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♦7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Burk-Harken
200 0.00 4.00 4♠* S -1 ♣T 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠Q
♥54
♦AK985
♣Q8732
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3/2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 ♣A 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♠5 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♠2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Nelson-Loops
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ S ♦2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Burk-Harken
|
20 |
♠AKQT8
♥9
♦-
♣JT98642
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 2♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦4 ♥4 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.50 0.50 4N N +2 ♥5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Burk-Harken
690 3.50 0.50 3N S +3 ♥9 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Millslagle-Cowen
660 2.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♦4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Nelson-Loops
620 1.00 3.00 5♣ N +1 ♥5 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
600 0.00 4.00 3N S ♦3 1-Jacobs-Browning vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|