1 |
♠J4
♥AQJT63
♦J7
♣Q65
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦1 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 5♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ N -1 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Harken-Tainty
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ N -2 ♠A 3-Cowen-Roy vs 5-Nelson-Loops
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ E +2 ♥8 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Harken-Winham
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ E +2 ♥4 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
480 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 ♦Q 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
2 |
♠Q876542
♥AJ
♦A3
♣T5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♦ 5♠ 5/4NT ♦7/6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♥T 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♦K 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
230 2.00 2.00 3♠ N +3 ♥7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Harken-Tainty
200 0.50 3.50 3♠ S +2 ♦K 3-Cowen-Roy vs 5-Nelson-Loops
200 0.50 3.50 2♠ N +3 ♦K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Harken-Winham
|
3 |
♠AQ73
♥-
♦KJ654
♣QJ98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♦ N +4 ♠6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Harken-Tainty
150 2.50 1.50 3♣ N +2 ♠6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Harken-Winham
150 2.50 1.50 3♣ N +2 ♠2 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
130 0.50 3.50 2♦ N +2 ♠2 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ N +1 ♠6 3-Cowen-Roy vs 5-Nelson-Loops
|
4 |
♠QJ8
♥98
♦K53
♣JT852
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♥3 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♠K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Harken-Tainty
120 2.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♠3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Harken-Winham
100 1.00 3.00 4♣ N -1 ♠4 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♠5 3-Cowen-Roy vs 5-Nelson-Loops
|
5 |
♠73
♥AKJ9764
♦K8
♣AJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ -/1♠ 4NT ♦5 ♠6/7 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Loops
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♠2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♦2 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ N ♦2 3-Cowen-Roy vs 4-Harken-Winham
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♠Q 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
6 |
♠AK5
♥K852
♦KQ864
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3/4♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♦6 3-Cowen-Roy vs 4-Harken-Winham
100 3.50 0.50 4♣ E -1 ♥9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Loops
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ E +1 ♦2 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Harken-Tainty
130 1.50 2.50 2♣ E +2 ♦7 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
7 |
♠AJ63
♥QJT96
♦K96
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3/4 ♦6 ♠5/6 NT4/6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♣7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ S ♦5 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♦Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Loops
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♣2 3-Cowen-Roy vs 4-Harken-Winham
100 0.00 4.00 2N E -1 ♥2 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
8 |
♠A76
♥K9863
♦QJ
♣K32
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ E ♥5 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
150 3.00 1.00 1N W +2 ♥6 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Harken-Tainty
180 2.00 2.00 1N W +3 ♥6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Nelson-Loops
210 1.00 3.00 2N W +3 ♥6 3-Cowen-Roy vs 4-Harken-Winham
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
9 |
♠AK876
♥-
♦A86543
♣AK
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 5♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥2 ♠3 NT2/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠2 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Nelson-Loops
400 2.00 2.00 3N N ♣8 3-Cowen-Roy vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
400 2.00 2.00 3N N ♣8 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
400 2.00 2.00 5♦ N ♣6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Winham
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ N ♣6 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
10 |
♠A83
♥Q6
♦A863
♣KJ84
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♠A 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Nelson-Loops
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Winham
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♥A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Harken-Tainty
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ N +2 ♥2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ S ♥A 3-Cowen-Roy vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
11 |
♠T9
♥9743
♦T7
♣A9754
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣3 ♥5/4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5♣ S ♦3 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Harken-Tainty
130 3.00 1.00 4♣ S ♠8 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Nelson-Loops
100 2.00 2.00 4♦ W -2 ♣A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Winham
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ W -1 ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ W ♣4 3-Cowen-Roy vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
12 |
♠QJ9742
♥742
♦3
♣AK3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 4.00 0.00 4♠* N ♥Q 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Nelson-Loops
650 3.00 1.00 5♠ N ♥A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Harken-Tainty
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♣7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 3.00 5♥ E -1 ♣9 3-Cowen-Roy vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
650 0.00 4.00 5♠* W ♠6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Winham
|
13 |
♠9754
♥8
♦T96
♣AK983
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 5♣ N +1 ♠Q 3-Cowen-Roy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Harken-Tainty
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ S +1 ♥A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Nelson-Loops
150 1.50 2.50 3♣ S +2 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♥3 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Harken-Winham
|
14 |
♠8653
♥8532
♦-
♣KQ873
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 3/4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3/4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 1♣ W +2 ♠8 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Nelson-Loops
180 2.50 1.50 2N E +2 ♦5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
180 2.50 1.50 1N W +3 ♣7 3-Cowen-Roy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
430 0.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♥2 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Harken-Winham
430 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♥4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Harken-Tainty
|
15 |
♠K
♥AJT54
♦AQT
♣Q853
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: -/1♣ 3/5♠ 3/4NT ♣6/7 ♦6 ♥5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♥A 3-Cowen-Roy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ W +2 ♣3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Harken-Tainty
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♣3 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Nelson-Loops
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♣3 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Harken-Winham
|
16 |
♠AK842
♥KJ3
♦KJ953
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ -/1♥ 2NT ♦3 ♥6/7 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.88 0.13 4♠ S ♣A 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Nelson-Loops
200 1.38 2.63 3♠ N +2 ♣3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
200 1.38 2.63 2♠ N +3 ♥2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Harken-Tainty
200 1.38 2.63 2♠ N +3 ♣3 3-Cowen-Roy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠9853
♥J932
♦52
♣A64
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -2 ♣K 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Winham
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 ♠A 3-Cowen-Roy vs 1-Harken-Tainty
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ E ♦4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ E ♣K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Nelson-Loops
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠3 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
18 |
♠QJ2
♥8432
♦Q9
♣Q975
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -2 ♥8 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Nelson-Loops
50 3.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♥2 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Winham
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♣2 3-Cowen-Roy vs 1-Harken-Tainty
120 0.00 4.00 2N E ♥6 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
19 |
♠K96
♥A86
♦A954
♣T74
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♦6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
430 2.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♥3 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Winham
430 2.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♥2 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.50 3.50 4♣ S +1 ♥3 3-Cowen-Roy vs 1-Harken-Tainty
150 0.50 3.50 3♣ S +2 ♥K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Nelson-Loops
|
20 |
♠KT8532
♥762
♦K3
♣A5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♣2 3-Cowen-Roy vs 1-Harken-Tainty
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♥3 4-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥3 2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Winham
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♣T 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Nelson-Loops
|