1 |
♠AT2
♥532
♦AK7
♣AJ52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1020 2.50 0.50 6N N +1 ♠9 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
1020 2.50 0.50 6N N +1 ♠9 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
990 1.00 2.00 6N N ♠4 7-Harken-Burk vs 3-Grant-Nelson
490 0.00 3.00 4N N +2 ♠8 4-Davidson-Suddards vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
|
2 |
♠K7
♥KJ8
♦T95
♣JT763
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♠3 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ S ♣2 7-Harken-Burk vs 3-Grant-Nelson
90 1.00 2.00 1N N ♥6 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♣K 4-Davidson-Suddards vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
|
3 |
♠KJ65
♥43
♦JT84
♣K54
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠3/2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♦4 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
100 2.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦6 7-Harken-Burk vs 3-Grant-Nelson
600 0.50 2.50 3N W ♦J 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
600 0.50 2.50 3N W ♦4 4-Davidson-Suddards vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
|
4 |
♠K54
♥Q8
♦542
♣KJT96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♦Q 7-Harken-Burk vs 3-Grant-Nelson
100 2.00 1.00 2N W -1 ♥Q 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
100 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
130 0.00 3.00 3♦ W +1 ♥Q 4-Davidson-Suddards vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
|
5 |
♠A85
♥8654
♦7
♣KQ986
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 3♥ S +2 ♠7 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 3-Grant-Nelson
200 2.50 0.50 3♥ N +2 ♠Q 7-Harken-Burk vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
150 0.50 2.50 4♠ E -3 ♦K 1-Turnquist-Gunter vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
150 0.50 2.50 4♠ E -3 ♦K 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
|
6 |
♠98532
♥72
♦Q532
♣76
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦5 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 6♥ 1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 1.00 5♥ E +1 ♣T 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
680 2.00 1.00 4♥ E +2 ♣8 1-Turnquist-Gunter vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
680 2.00 1.00 4♥ E +2 ♣5 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 3-Grant-Nelson
1430 0.00 3.00 6♥ E ♠A 7-Harken-Burk vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
7 |
♠A
♥T8654
♦A93
♣T543
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S ♣2 7-Harken-Burk vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
200 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♣A 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 3-Grant-Nelson
170 1.00 2.00 2♥ S +2 ♠3 1-Turnquist-Gunter vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
130 0.00 3.00 4♣ S ♥7 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
|
8 |
♠KQT982
♥AQ754
♦6
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 6♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3/4 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♣J 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥9 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 3-Grant-Nelson
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♣3 7-Harken-Burk vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♥9 1-Turnquist-Gunter vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
|
9 |
♠AJ
♥KQT
♦K95
♣96532
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3/2♠ ♥6 NT6/5 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.17 0.83 2♠ S ♦2 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
110 2.17 0.83 2♠ N ♣A 1-Turnquist-Gunter vs 7-Harken-Burk
50 0.17 2.83 4♠ N -1 ♠3 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Grant-Nelson
|
10 |
♠QT
♥T643
♦K7643
♣KT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 2♠ W -1 ♦4 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Grant-Nelson
110 0.83 2.17 2♠ W ♦4 1-Turnquist-Gunter vs 7-Harken-Burk
110 0.83 2.17 2♠ W ♦4 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
|
11 |
♠KQ52
♥A4
♦K4
♣A9864
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♠ 1/3NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.83 0.17 3N S ♦7 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Grant-Nelson
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ N +1 ♦5 1-Turnquist-Gunter vs 7-Harken-Burk
150 0.17 2.83 3N N -3 ♥T 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
|
12 |
♠T963
♥43
♦AQ6
♣T732
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.83 0.17 1N S +1 ♥7 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
110 1.50 1.50 1♠ N +1 ♦T 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Grant-Nelson
90 0.17 2.83 1N S ♥K 1-Turnquist-Gunter vs 7-Harken-Burk
|
13 |
♠QT975
♥KQT872
♦J9
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4♠ ♣1 ♦2 NT5 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♥ N -2 ♣A 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
620 1.50 1.50 5♦ E +1 ♥A 2-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
620 1.50 1.50 5♣ W +1 ♥K 7-Harken-Burk vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
950 0.00 3.00 5♦* E +1 ♠A 3-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
14 |
♠A652
♥T3
♦KJ954
♣J7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ E ♠A 3-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
420 2.50 0.50 4♥ E ♣K 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
450 0.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♣J 2-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
450 0.50 2.50 5♥ E ♣K 7-Harken-Burk vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
15 |
♠Q65432
♥5
♦T62
♣QT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 6♥ 2♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 6♥ W -1 ♠4 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
480 1.00 2.00 4♥ W +2 ♠A 3-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
480 1.00 2.00 4♥ W +2 ♠4 2-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
480 1.00 2.00 4♥ W +2 ♠2 7-Harken-Burk vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
16 |
♠AJ5
♥J9
♦AQT
♣AQJ98
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3/4 ♥3/4 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠A 3-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
400 2.00 1.00 3N N ♠6 2-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
150 0.50 2.50 4♣ N +1 ♥4 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
150 0.50 2.50 3♣ N +2 ♦7 7-Harken-Burk vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
17 |
♠A5
♥AT65432
♦9
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 7♥ 6NT ♠5 |
EW: 1/2♠ ♣1 ♦6 ♥0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.17 0.83 6♥ N ♦Q 4-Davidson-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Burk
980 2.17 0.83 6♥ N ♦Q 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
480 0.17 2.83 4♥ N +2 ♦Q 3-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
|
18 |
♠9873
♥J64
♦A2
♣QJ74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.17 0.83 4♠ W ♦A 3-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
420 2.17 0.83 4♠ W ♦A 4-Davidson-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Burk
450 0.17 2.83 4♠ E +1 ♠J 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
|
19 |
♠AT
♥AKT7
♦AQJ93
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4/5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥0/1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.83 0.17 5♥ S +1 ♥2 3-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
450 0.83 2.17 5♥ N ♠6 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
450 0.83 2.17 4♥ S +1 ♠5 4-Davidson-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Burk
|
20 |
♠A7653
♥-
♦A972
♣KJ87
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.17 0.83 4♠ N ♦4 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom
620 2.17 0.83 4♠ N ♣9 3-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
140 0.17 2.83 2♠ N +1 ♣5 4-Davidson-Suddards vs 7-Harken-Burk
|
21 |
♠9864
♥KJT83
♦T2
♣A2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.17 0.83 2♠ N ♣K 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
110 2.17 0.83 2♦ S +1 ♣3 2-Gamble-Reiss vs 7-Harken-Burk
110 0.17 2.83 2♣ W +1 ♦T 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
22 |
♠QJT872
♥64
♦T743
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 2/-NT ♦4 ♠3 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ S +1 ♣Q 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ N ♣2 2-Gamble-Reiss vs 7-Harken-Burk
50 0.17 2.83 4♠ N -1 ♥A 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
23 |
♠KQJ4
♥43
♦KT8
♣KT95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: -/1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6/7 ♠5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 4♥ E -1 ♣4 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
100 2.17 0.83 3♥ E -1 ♣2 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
620 0.17 2.83 4♥ E ♣3 2-Gamble-Reiss vs 7-Harken-Burk
|
24 |
♠Q73
♥KT97
♦93
♣AKT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.17 0.83 2♥ S +1 ♠6 2-Gamble-Reiss vs 7-Harken-Burk
140 2.17 0.83 2♥ S +1 ♦Q 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
50 0.17 2.83 2♥ S -1 ♦Q 8-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
25 |
♠7
♥QT
♦Q43
♣KQJT653
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.50 1.50 4♣ N ♠3 3-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ N +1 ♠Q 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ N +1 ♠Q 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
|
26 |
♠A62
♥AJ4
♦AQ98
♣A73
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 2♦ E -3 ♥6 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
200 1.50 1.50 3♥ S -2 ♠9 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
300 0.17 2.83 4♥ S -3 ♠K 3-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
|
27 |
♠4
♥AK54
♦A7
♣KJ9863
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.17 0.83 2N N +1 ♥J 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
150 2.17 0.83 3♣ N +2 ♥J 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
50 0.17 2.83 5♣ N -1 ♥J 3-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
|
28 |
♠A3
♥J2
♦T98764
♣964
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3N W -3 ♥J 6-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Gamble-Reiss
50 1.50 1.50 3♣ W -1 ♥J 3-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
150 0.17 2.83 2N W +1 ♦T 5-Wasserstrom-Wasserstrom vs 4-Davidson-Suddards
|