1 |
♠93
♥KJT4
♦AQ87
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♠Q 6-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
50 2.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♥7 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Matthews-Baker
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ E ♥7 9-Harken-Burk vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
150 0.00 3.00 1N N -3 ♠J 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 3-Murdock-Benich
|
2 |
♠AQ854
♥7
♦T53
♣A765
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6/5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3/2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♦5 6-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ W ♥7 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Matthews-Baker
420 1.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦T 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 3-Murdock-Benich
450 0.00 3.00 5♥ W ♥7 9-Harken-Burk vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
3 |
♠A973
♥K987
♦3
♣K864
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ S ♦2 6-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ S ♦4 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 3-Murdock-Benich
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ S ♦2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Matthews-Baker
90 0.00 3.00 2♣ N ♦4 9-Harken-Burk vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
4 |
♠862
♥QJ2
♦962
♣QT42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♦K 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 6-Burke-Reuben
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♣9 5-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ S ♦K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Harken-Burk
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ S ♣9 8-Matthews-Baker vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
5 |
♠3
♥J7432
♦543
♣QJ82
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Harken-Burk
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♠A 5-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♠A 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 6-Burke-Reuben
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♠A 8-Matthews-Baker vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
6 |
♠KJ
♥Q642
♦764
♣JT86
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3♠ S -2 ♣A 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 6-Burke-Reuben
100 2.50 0.50 3♠ S -2 ♣A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 9-Harken-Burk
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♠K 5-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ W ♠J 8-Matthews-Baker vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
7 |
♠AKQ9
♥AK83
♦KQ4
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠J 8-Matthews-Baker vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
600 2.00 1.00 3N N ♥Q 2-Cowen-Millslagle vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
100 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♣4 6-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Murdock-Benich
100 0.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♣4 9-Harken-Burk vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
8 |
♠K64
♥5
♦AKQ5
♣AK843
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N ♥K 6-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Murdock-Benich
150 2.00 1.00 3♦ N +2 ♥K 2-Cowen-Millslagle vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ S ♥4 8-Matthews-Baker vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥3 9-Harken-Burk vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
9 |
♠KJ82
♥93
♦T9
♣J9864
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♣5 6-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Murdock-Benich
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦K 2-Cowen-Millslagle vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
100 1.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 ♦A 9-Harken-Burk vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
150 0.00 3.00 2N S -3 ♥7 8-Matthews-Baker vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
|
10 |
♠AKJ65
♥98
♦74
♣AKQ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ ♣3/4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ E +2 ♠7 9-Harken-Burk vs 8-Matthews-Baker
300 2.00 1.00 4♠ N -3 ♥A 3-Murdock-Benich vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
620 0.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠3 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
620 0.50 2.50 4♥ E ♣T 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
11 |
♠T42
♥Q83
♦9873
♣Q42
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♦T 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
50 2.00 1.00 1N E -1 ♠K 3-Murdock-Benich vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
90 1.00 2.00 1N E ♠K 9-Harken-Burk vs 8-Matthews-Baker
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ S -2 ♥J 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
12 |
♠AQ986
♥KJT
♦J
♣K952
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥A 9-Harken-Burk vs 8-Matthews-Baker
200 2.00 1.00 5♠ N -2 ♥A 3-Murdock-Benich vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
400 1.00 2.00 5♦ E ♣J 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
940 0.00 3.00 6♦ E +1 ♣J 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
13 |
♠AQ7
♥AT2
♦6543
♣A63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 2N N ♦Q 8-Matthews-Baker vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ S ♦9 2-Cowen-Millslagle vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ E ♥K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Murdock-Benich
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♦A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 6-Burke-Reuben
|
14 |
♠K
♥6
♦754
♣AKJT9842
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 5♣ N -1 ♠A 2-Cowen-Millslagle vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
150 1.50 1.50 5♣ N -3 ♠A 8-Matthews-Baker vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
150 1.50 1.50 5♣ N -3 ♦T 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 6-Burke-Reuben
800 0.00 3.00 5♣* N -4 ♠A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Murdock-Benich
|
15 |
♠QJ3
♥T74
♦-
♣AKJT875
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠6/5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♦ E -1 ♣3 8-Matthews-Baker vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ W ♣A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Murdock-Benich
300 0.50 2.50 3♠ N -3 ♦K 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 6-Burke-Reuben
300 0.50 2.50 5♥ S -3 ♣6 2-Cowen-Millslagle vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
|
16 |
♠T9865
♥KJ4
♦KJ42
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4/3♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♠5 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
480 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♠3 9-Harken-Burk vs 6-Burke-Reuben
480 2.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♦5 3-Murdock-Benich vs 8-Matthews-Baker
200 0.00 3.00 3♠ S +2 ♥9 5-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
|
17 |
♠J943
♥QJ
♦Q2
♣K9874
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦A 3-Murdock-Benich vs 8-Matthews-Baker
180 2.00 1.00 1N S +3 ♥5 9-Harken-Burk vs 6-Burke-Reuben
50 0.50 2.50 3♥ W -1 ♣7 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
50 0.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 ♠3 5-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
|
18 |
♠9865
♥AJ6
♦KT9873
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 2/3♦ ♥3/4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♦T 5-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♦J 3-Murdock-Benich vs 8-Matthews-Baker
50 1.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦7 9-Harken-Burk vs 6-Burke-Reuben
200 0.00 3.00 4♣ S -2 ♦4 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
|
19 |
♠K73
♥986
♦AK62
♣963
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 2/1♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦A 6-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Matthews-Baker
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ W +3 ♦K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 9-Harken-Burk
680 0.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♦A 3-Murdock-Benich vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
20 |
♠7653
♥A852
♦T87
♣KJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♦A 3-Murdock-Benich vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
140 1.50 1.50 1♥ N +2 ♦2 6-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Matthews-Baker
140 1.50 1.50 1♥ N +2 ♦2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♦Q 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 9-Harken-Burk
|
21 |
♠QJ975
♥T653
♦Q8
♣82
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠4 6-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Matthews-Baker
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♠Q 3-Murdock-Benich vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
460 1.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠T 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 9-Harken-Burk
490 0.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♦T 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
22 |
♠732
♥T
♦852
♣AKT942
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ W ♣A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Burke-Reuben
650 1.00 2.00 5♥ E ♣3 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 9-Harken-Burk
650 1.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♣A 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Murdock-Benich
650 1.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♠A 2-Cowen-Millslagle vs 8-Matthews-Baker
|
23 |
♠T82
♥JT4
♦QJ7
♣K762
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6/4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥J 2-Cowen-Millslagle vs 8-Matthews-Baker
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♥J 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 9-Harken-Burk
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♥T 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Murdock-Benich
140 1.00 2.00 1♠ W +2 ♣2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Burke-Reuben
|
24 |
♠A65
♥95
♦AJ85
♣Q873
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♣4 2-Cowen-Millslagle vs 8-Matthews-Baker
50 1.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♥9 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff vs 9-Harken-Burk
50 1.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♥9 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Burke-Reuben
50 1.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♣3 4-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Murdock-Benich
|
25 |
♠J6
♥QJ83
♦K754
♣764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5/4 ♦5/4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.50 0.50 1N S +1 ♣2 3-Murdock-Benich vs 9-Harken-Burk
120 2.50 0.50 1N S +1 ♣2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
90 0.50 2.50 1N S ♥9 5-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
90 0.50 2.50 1N S ♣2 6-Burke-Reuben vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
26 |
♠K32
♥T2
♦KT8
♣T8762
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1/2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♠2 3-Murdock-Benich vs 9-Harken-Burk
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ E ♥3 5-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
200 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +3 ♠2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
650 0.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♣6 6-Burke-Reuben vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
|
27 |
♠KJ43
♥754
♦AT932
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ -/1♥ ♦6 ♥6/7 ♠4 NT5/6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3♦* E -2 ♥A 6-Burke-Reuben vs 2-Cowen-Millslagle
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♥A 3-Murdock-Benich vs 9-Harken-Burk
100 1.00 2.00 3♣ S -2 ♦7 5-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Zinman-Osborn
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ W ♣7 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Laborde Bishop-McDuff
|