1 |
♠J3
♥-
♦AQJ98752
♣J92
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣1 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 3♥ 5♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 5♦ N -2 ♠K 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
100 1.50 0.50 5♦ N -2 ♣K 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 4-Zinman-Karter
450 0.00 2.00 5♠ W ♦A 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
|
2 |
♠QJT84
♥K
♦QJ3
♣Q952
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦2 NT4/5 |
EW: 5♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ E +1 ♥Q 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ E +1 ♣A 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ E +2 ♣A 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
3 |
♠62
♥A52
♦AJT73
♣975
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3♥ W -4 ♠6 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 4-Zinman-Karter
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 ♣4 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 ♣4 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
4 |
♠T7
♥AK72
♦9643
♣KJ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ W ♥A 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 4-Zinman-Karter
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♥A 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♥A 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
5 |
♠KQJT4
♥6
♦32
♣KQ974
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥0 ♠6/5 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 5/6♦ 7♥ 1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 1.50 0.50 4♥ W +3 ♠K 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 4-Zinman-Karter
510 1.50 0.50 4♥ W +3 ♠K 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
1510 0.00 2.00 7♥ W ♠K 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
|
6 |
♠A8
♥KJ9
♦AK42
♣T532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 4♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♣ S -1 ♠4 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 4-Zinman-Karter
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ E ♦T 5-Feldstein-Rodgers vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♦Q 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
|
7 |
♠863
♥84
♦Q2
♣KQJ742
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♥ E +1 ♣8 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 4-Zinman-Karter
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ W ♣K 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
620 0.50 1.50 4♥ E ♣K 5-Feldstein-Rodgers vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
8 |
♠JT97
♥A542
♦AQ83
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♦J 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 4-Zinman-Karter
50 1.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♦J 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
120 0.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♦J 5-Feldstein-Rodgers vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
9 |
♠AQT4
♥Q
♦A97
♣KQT74
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♣9 5-Feldstein-Rodgers vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♦6 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♣9 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
10 |
♠987
♥J832
♦J84
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣4/5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 3♦ W -3 ♦J 5-Feldstein-Rodgers vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W ♠9 3-Smith-Oppenheimer vs 4-Zinman-Karter
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥A 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
|
11 |
♠74
♥976
♦632
♣AK863
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N W ♣A 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
460 1.00 1.00 3N W +2 ♣6 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
490 0.00 2.00 3N W +3 ♣6 4-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
|
12 |
♠8743
♥2
♦AKQT8
♣QJ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 5♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥J 4-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
600 1.00 1.00 3N S ♥J 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
150 0.00 2.00 2N S +1 ♥J 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
13 |
♠73
♥6543
♦AJ9876
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♠Q 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
120 1.00 1.00 2N E ♠Q 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
150 0.00 2.00 2N W +1 ♦6 4-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
|
14 |
♠QJ653
♥9
♦942
♣K653
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 3NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N E +1 ♥J 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
400 0.50 1.50 3N E ♥J 4-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
400 0.50 1.50 3N E ♥J 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
15 |
♠A54
♥AK763
♦J94
♣98
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♦ W -2 ♥A 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
50 0.50 1.50 3♦ W -1 ♥A 4-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
50 0.50 1.50 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
|
16 |
♠T9
♥AK8653
♦J63
♣62
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 6♣ E -1 ♥4 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Zinman-Karter
130 1.00 1.00 4♣ E ♥7 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
1150 0.00 2.00 3N* E +2 ♥4 5-Feldstein-Rodgers vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
|
17 |
♠QJ5
♥J432
♦Q8543
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2/1♥ 4♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.00 1.00 3N E ♥T 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
400 1.00 1.00 3N E ♥T 5-Feldstein-Rodgers vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
400 1.00 1.00 3N E ♥T 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
18 |
♠KT643
♥Q43
♦AJT
♣K6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♦ ♣6/7 ♥5/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 2♦ E -1 ♠4 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
50 1.50 0.50 2♣ W -1 ♠4 5-Feldstein-Rodgers vs 2-Walker-Faircrest
200 0.00 2.00 2♠* N -1 ♦9 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
19 |
♠K985
♥JT74
♦QJ6
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.75 0.25 3♥ W -2 ♦Q 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Zinman-Karter
110 0.25 1.75 2♠ S ♥6 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
20 |
♠KQ98
♥KT42
♦A8
♣KQ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.75 0.25 4♥ N +1 ♠T 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
620 0.25 1.75 4♥ N ♦5 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
21 |
♠AJ985
♥KQ4
♦KT86
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 5♣* E -3 ♠3 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
50 0.50 1.50 4♣ W -1 ♠A 4-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
50 0.50 1.50 4♣ E -1 ♥4 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
|
22 |
♠K63
♥K74
♦QT84
♣A83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5/6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 1♠ W -1 ♥4 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
100 1.50 0.50 2♦ W -1 ♣A 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
90 0.00 2.00 1N E ♣4 4-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
23 |
♠AJ742
♥A4
♦3
♣AQJ96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2/3♠ ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦A 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ N ♥5 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
200 0.00 2.00 4♠* N -1 ♦A 4-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
24 |
♠A82
♥J9
♦KJ965
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -4 ♦A 4-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
110 1.00 1.00 3♦ N ♥2 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♥3 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
|
25 |
♠7
♥K73
♦QJ654
♣K743
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 ♦Q 2-Walker-Faircrest vs 3-Smith-Oppenheimer
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ E ♦7 4-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
140 0.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♦Q 6-Winham-Avenmarg vs 5-Feldstein-Rodgers
|