1 |
♠AKQ75
♥T86
♦A
♣K965
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N S ♥A 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
400 3.50 0.50 7-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Harken-Murdock
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ N +2 ♠J 6-Burke-Wesolowski vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Gift-Claussen
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥3 8-Albright-Gunter vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
|
2 |
♠AKQ86
♥AKJ8
♦2
♣AJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 6♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥3/4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♦A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Gift-Claussen
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♦A 6-Burke-Wesolowski vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♦A 9-Harken-Murdock vs 7-Zinman-Karter
650 0.50 3.50 5♠ S ♥2 8-Albright-Gunter vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ N +1 ♦A 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
|
3 |
♠T983
♥T96
♦963
♣K92
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3♦ 4/3♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 7-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Harken-Murdock
50 3.00 1.00 1♠ S -1 ♥Q 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Gift-Claussen
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E ♠A 6-Burke-Wesolowski vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ E +1 ♣J 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♠3 8-Albright-Gunter vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
|
4 |
♠-
♥73
♦9752
♣AKJT732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣3/4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3♠ S -1 ♦6 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 2-Gift-Claussen
200 1.38 2.63 3N S -2 ♥T 11-Keen-Burk vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
200 1.38 2.63 5♣ N -2 ♥Q 1-Johnson-Suddards vs 8-Albright-Gunter
200 1.38 2.63 4♣ N -2 ♥Q 9-Harken-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠KJ4
♥K653
♦J972
♣A2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: -/1♦ ♣5 ♦6/7 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.88 0.13 3N N ♠3 11-Keen-Burk vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
150 2.00 2.00 2N N +1 ♦4 1-Johnson-Suddards vs 8-Albright-Gunter
150 2.00 2.00 1N N +2 ♥J 9-Harken-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
120 0.13 3.88 2N N ♦4 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 2-Gift-Claussen
|
6 |
♠Q863
♥QJ753
♦Q5
♣A9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 6/5♥ 5/4♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥1 ♠2 NT2/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.88 0.13 4♥ S +2 ♣5 11-Keen-Burk vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
450 2.63 1.38 4♥ S +1 ♣2 1-Johnson-Suddards vs 8-Albright-Gunter
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ S ♦7 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 2-Gift-Claussen
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ S ♦4 9-Harken-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠JT87
♥J64
♦AKQ85
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2/3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 2N S +1 ♥2 7-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
120 2.63 1.38 2N S ♥2 2-Gift-Claussen vs 9-Harken-Murdock
PASS 1.38 2.63 Pass Out 11-Keen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.13 3.88 2♠ N -1 ♣8 10-Smith-Millslagle vs 8-Albright-Gunter
|
8 |
♠8
♥J73
♦AKT
♣Q86543
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1/-NT ♦5 ♠5 NT7/6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 2♦ E -1 ♣J 7-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -2 ♦8 2-Gift-Claussen vs 9-Harken-Murdock
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -2 ♦8 11-Keen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ E ♣J 10-Smith-Millslagle vs 8-Albright-Gunter
|
9 |
♠A8653
♥AT6
♦T62
♣J5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.25 0.75 3♠ N ♥J 10-Smith-Millslagle vs 8-Albright-Gunter
140 3.25 0.75 3♠ N ♥3 7-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
110 1.38 2.63 2♥ E ♦7 11-Keen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.13 3.88 2♥ W +1 ♦7 2-Gift-Claussen vs 9-Harken-Murdock
|
10 |
♠J743
♥A4
♦A973
♣KT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.88 0.13 3N S ♣7 10-Smith-Millslagle vs 9-Harken-Murdock
200 2.63 1.38 1N E -2 ♠A 2-Gift-Claussen vs 7-Zinman-Karter
150 1.38 2.63 2N S +1 ♣5 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 ♥K 11-Keen-Burk vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
|
11 |
♠3
♥QJ8
♦KQJ8764
♣76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣0 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 5♥ 7♠ 7NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 3.25 0.75 4♠ W +3 ♦K 10-Smith-Millslagle vs 9-Harken-Murdock
510 3.25 0.75 4♠ W +3 ♦K 11-Keen-Burk vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
1010 0.75 3.25 6♠ W +1 ♥8 2-Gift-Claussen vs 7-Zinman-Karter
1010 0.75 3.25 6♠ W +1 ♣7 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
|
12 |
♠AT654
♥K2
♦AKT5
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.88 0.13 4♠ N ♥7 2-Gift-Claussen vs 7-Zinman-Karter
170 2.63 1.38 2♠ N +2 ♣6 10-Smith-Millslagle vs 9-Harken-Murdock
100 1.38 2.63 3♣ W -2 ♦A 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
110 0.13 3.88 3♣ W ♦K 11-Keen-Burk vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
|
13 |
♠5
♥9743
♦A742
♣JT97
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 3N W -1 ♦2 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.25 0.75 2N W -1 ♣J 7-Zinman-Karter vs 11-Keen-Burk
110 0.75 3.25 2♠ E ♥T 9-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
110 0.75 3.25 2♠ E ♣8 1-Johnson-Suddards vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
|
14 |
♠KT932
♥984
♦A98
♣73
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.63 1.38 3N W ♠T 7-Zinman-Karter vs 11-Keen-Burk
400 2.63 1.38 3N W ♠3 1-Johnson-Suddards vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
400 2.63 1.38 3N W ♥9 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
460 0.13 3.88 3N W +2 ♠3 9-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
|
15 |
♠9
♥K983
♦9732
♣J853
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2/1♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 1♠ S +2 ♦A 7-Zinman-Karter vs 11-Keen-Burk
110 2.00 2.00 1♠ S +1 ♥J 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.00 2.00 1♠ S +1 ♣A 9-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
140 0.13 3.88 3♥ W ♠9 1-Johnson-Suddards vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
|
16 |
♠K986
♥AK
♦J632
♣AK8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥3 2-Gift-Claussen vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
400 1.50 2.50 3N S ♦7 8-Albright-Gunter vs 11-Keen-Burk
400 1.50 2.50 3N S ♣2 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
400 1.50 2.50 3N N ♥8 1-Johnson-Suddards vs 7-Zinman-Karter
400 1.50 2.50 3N N ♣5 4-Chase-Avenmarg vs 9-Harken-Murdock
|
17 |
♠A
♥QT
♦QJ63
♣AQJ984
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣1 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 4♣ N +2 ♠9 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥A 2-Gift-Claussen vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ N ♦A 8-Albright-Gunter vs 11-Keen-Burk
50 1.00 3.00 5♣ N -1 ♦A 1-Johnson-Suddards vs 7-Zinman-Karter
150 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -3 ♥6 4-Chase-Avenmarg vs 9-Harken-Murdock
|
18 |
♠J962
♥AJT963
♦A5
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 4/3♥ 3/2♠ 4/3NT ♣7/6 ♦6/5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦K 4-Chase-Avenmarg vs 9-Harken-Murdock
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♥2 1-Johnson-Suddards vs 7-Zinman-Karter
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♣A 8-Albright-Gunter vs 11-Keen-Burk
100 1.00 3.00 3♦ E -2 ♥K 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -2 ♠K 2-Gift-Claussen vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
|
19 |
♠AQT73
♥9872
♦863
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N S ♥5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♣4 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Zinman-Karter
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♣J 2-Gift-Claussen vs 8-Albright-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♥Q 6-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♣6 11-Keen-Burk vs 9-Harken-Murdock
|
20 |
♠4
♥AT842
♦432
♣QT54
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6♠ W -1 ♥A 11-Keen-Burk vs 9-Harken-Murdock
650 1.50 2.50 5♠ W ♣4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
650 1.50 2.50 5♠ W ♣4 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Zinman-Karter
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♣4 2-Gift-Claussen vs 8-Albright-Gunter
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♣4 6-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
|
21 |
♠7
♥T952
♦AJ865
♣Q98
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ S ♣J 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
50 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♦6 6-Burke-Wesolowski vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♠7 2-Gift-Claussen vs 8-Albright-Gunter
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♦A 11-Keen-Burk vs 9-Harken-Murdock
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♠7 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Zinman-Karter
|
22 |
♠JT863
♥KQ
♦AJ752
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ 1/2NT ♣5 ♥4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 4♦ S ♥J 10-Smith-Millslagle vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ S +1 ♥J 11-Keen-Burk vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 6-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Gift-Claussen
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Albright-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♣J 7-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠AQJ732
♥KQ
♦AT
♣K98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6/5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N S ♥7 11-Keen-Burk vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♥9 7-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♦K 10-Smith-Millslagle vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
140 2.00 2.00 1♠ N +2 ♦4 6-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Gift-Claussen
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ N ♥9 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Albright-Gunter
|
24 |
♠32
♥A643
♦K8
♣AQ754
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1/2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 1N W -3 ♣5 6-Burke-Wesolowski vs 2-Gift-Claussen
150 3.50 0.50 2♣ N +3 ♠J 10-Smith-Millslagle vs 4-Chase-Avenmarg
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ N ♠J 7-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 3.00 1N W -2 ♣5 11-Keen-Burk vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
90 0.00 4.00 2♣ S ♠A 12-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Albright-Gunter
|
25 |
♠QT73
♥K93
♦K94
♣Q42
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.88 0.13 4♠ S ♦Q 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
140 2.63 1.38 2♠ N +1 ♥7 2-Gift-Claussen vs 11-Keen-Burk
50 0.75 3.25 3N S -1 ♦Q 8-Albright-Gunter vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
50 0.75 3.25 4♠ S -1 ♥J 4-Chase-Avenmarg vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
|
26 |
♠A853
♥863
♦42
♣AQ32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 2/1♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.25 0.75 3♦ S ♥A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
110 3.25 0.75 2♦ S +1 ♥A 4-Chase-Avenmarg vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
100 0.75 3.25 3♥ W -1 ♦4 2-Gift-Claussen vs 11-Keen-Burk
100 0.75 3.25 3♣ W -1 ♦4 8-Albright-Gunter vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
|
27 |
♠AJ64
♥Q92
♦AQT2
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N S ♠7 8-Albright-Gunter vs 6-Burke-Wesolowski
50 2.63 1.38 3N N -1 ♥7 2-Gift-Claussen vs 11-Keen-Burk
100 1.38 2.63 4♠ N -2 ♣5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Smith-Millslagle
150 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -3 ♦4 4-Chase-Avenmarg vs 1-Johnson-Suddards
|