1 |
♠J86
♥KJT7
♦7632
♣75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♣A 7-Stone-Murdock vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♣A 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 2-Hullman-Smith
170 2.50 1.50 1♠ E +3 ♣A 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Benz-Harken
170 2.50 1.50 1♠ E +3 ♣A 10-Benich-Oing vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
400 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥J 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Schilling-Benich
|
2 |
♠QT9
♥A96
♦J952
♣AT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6♥* E -1 ♣9 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Benz-Harken
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ W ♥A 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Schilling-Benich
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠A 10-Benich-Oing vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♥3 7-Stone-Murdock vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♣9 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 2-Hullman-Smith
|
3 |
♠9765
♥-
♦AQJ42
♣Q543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ ♥0 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 5♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 2.00 5♥ E ♣A 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Schilling-Benich
650 2.00 2.00 5♥ E ♣A 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 2-Hullman-Smith
650 2.00 2.00 5♥ E ♣A 10-Benich-Oing vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♣A 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 5-Benz-Harken
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♣A 7-Stone-Murdock vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
|
4 |
♠QJT53
♥KQ72
♦T74
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ S +1 ♦A 10-Benich-Oing vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
130 3.50 0.50 2♣ S +2 ♦A 1-Schilling-Benich vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
100 1.50 2.50 3♣ S -1 ♦A 5-Benz-Harken vs 2-Hullman-Smith
100 1.50 2.50 3♣ S -1 ♦A 7-Stone-Murdock vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♦K 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
|
5 |
♠-
♥AQJ953
♦K32
♣KT42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦0/1 ♥1 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.50 0.50 5♥ N +2 ♠A 5-Benz-Harken vs 2-Hullman-Smith
710 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +3 ♠A 1-Schilling-Benich vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
680 1.00 3.00 5♥ N +1 ♣7 10-Benich-Oing vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 ♣7 7-Stone-Murdock vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 ♣7 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
|
6 |
♠742
♥753
♦A963
♣A32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 6♦* N -2 ♠A 1-Schilling-Benich vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
650 2.00 2.00 5♠ E ♥J 7-Stone-Murdock vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♥J 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♥J 10-Benich-Oing vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
680 0.00 4.00 5♠ E +1 ♣T 5-Benz-Harken vs 2-Hullman-Smith
|
7 |
♠95
♥J843
♦97432
♣54
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 6/5♣ 3♦ 2/-♥ 5♠ 5NT ♥8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥5 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
600 3.00 1.00 3N E ♥5 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 7-Stone-Murdock
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♠5 2-Hullman-Smith vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♣9 10-Benich-Oing vs 1-Schilling-Benich
660 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♣8 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 5-Benz-Harken
|
8 |
♠8
♥J
♦K9752
♣A97542
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5/4♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠3 |
EW: 3♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♥6 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
100 3.50 0.50 5♠* E -1 ♠T 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 5-Benz-Harken
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♥A 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 7-Stone-Murdock
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +2 ♠T 2-Hullman-Smith vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♠7 10-Benich-Oing vs 1-Schilling-Benich
|
9 |
♠AQ975
♥865
♦AQ92
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N ♦5 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 5-Benz-Harken
50 2.50 1.50 2N S -1 ♥2 10-Benich-Oing vs 1-Schilling-Benich
50 2.50 1.50 3♦ N -1 ♥7 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♦5 2-Hullman-Smith vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♥2 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 7-Stone-Murdock
|
10 |
♠T652
♥T985
♦A92
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦2 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 5-Benz-Harken
100 3.00 1.00 6N E -1 ♦K 7-Stone-Murdock vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
170 2.00 2.00 3♣ E +3 ♦K 1-Schilling-Benich vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦K 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
620 0.50 3.50 5♣ E +1 ♣2 10-Benich-Oing vs 2-Hullman-Smith
|
11 |
♠-
♥72
♦987654
♣J7642
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 2N S ♠3 7-Stone-Murdock vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
120 3.50 0.50 2N S ♥6 1-Schilling-Benich vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
100 2.00 2.00 2♥* W -1 ♦9 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
50 1.00 3.00 5♦ N -1 ♥9 10-Benich-Oing vs 2-Hullman-Smith
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♥Q 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 5-Benz-Harken
|
12 |
♠Q983
♥KJT9542
♦KQ
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♥ 6♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥1 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +2 ♥3 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
680 2.00 2.00 5♥ N +1 ♠A 1-Schilling-Benich vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +2 ♠A 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 5-Benz-Harken
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +2 ♠A 10-Benich-Oing vs 2-Hullman-Smith
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +2 ♣K 7-Stone-Murdock vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
|
13 |
♠643
♥97
♦KJT84
♣J93
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣3 10-Benich-Oing vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ W +2 ♣9 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 5-Benz-Harken
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ W +2 ♣3 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
230 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +4 ♣3 1-Schilling-Benich vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♣J 2-Hullman-Smith vs 7-Stone-Murdock
|
14 |
♠J954
♥KJ76
♦A96
♣T2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♥6 10-Benich-Oing vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
100 3.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♣T 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 5-Benz-Harken
100 3.00 1.00 2N W -2 ♠4 2-Hullman-Smith vs 7-Stone-Murdock
50 1.00 3.00 2N E -1 ♠6 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
150 0.00 4.00 1N E +2 ♦3 1-Schilling-Benich vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
|
15 |
♠86
♥KQT5
♦843
♣QT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠4/3 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 2♠ E -1 ♠A 10-Benich-Oing vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
50 3.50 0.50 2♠ E -1 ♥A 1-Schilling-Benich vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E ♠A 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E ♥A 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 5-Benz-Harken
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♣2 2-Hullman-Smith vs 7-Stone-Murdock
|
16 |
♠Q965
♥J
♦A732
♣T865
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3/4♥ 3♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣3 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
400 2.00 2.00 3N S ♠J 5-Benz-Harken vs 7-Stone-Murdock
400 2.00 2.00 3N S ♦9 2-Hullman-Smith vs 1-Schilling-Benich
400 2.00 2.00 3N N ♠4 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♠4 10-Benich-Oing vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
|
17 |
♠AK2
♥QJT3
♦JT3
♣K98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 1N W +1 ♠2 5-Benz-Harken vs 7-Stone-Murdock
120 3.50 0.50 1N W +1 ♣9 2-Hullman-Smith vs 1-Schilling-Benich
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♠T 10-Benich-Oing vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♣3 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
250 0.00 4.00 2♣ N -5 ♦A 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
|
18 |
♠JT2
♥T7
♦JT972
♣943
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ E +1 ♦K 5-Benz-Harken vs 7-Stone-Murdock
130 3.50 0.50 2♣ W +2 ♦J 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ W +1 ♠2 2-Hullman-Smith vs 1-Schilling-Benich
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ W +1 ♦J 10-Benich-Oing vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
200 0.00 4.00 1N S -2 ♠K 9-Gamble-Llacera vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
|
19 |
♠543
♥T
♦9874
♣KJT85
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 1/-NT ♣4 ♦4/3 ♠6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♦ S ♣7 10-Benich-Oing vs 5-Benz-Harken
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♣8 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♠4 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 2-Hullman-Smith
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♠K 1-Schilling-Benich vs 7-Stone-Murdock
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♥5 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
|
20 |
♠KJ974
♥K8
♦A3
♣J964
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 6♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠0 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♥9 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 2-Hullman-Smith
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♥9 10-Benich-Oing vs 5-Benz-Harken
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♥4 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
200 1.00 3.00 5♥ W -2 ♠4 1-Schilling-Benich vs 7-Stone-Murdock
100 0.00 4.00 5♥ W -1 ♦A 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
|
21 |
♠AKQ8
♥T6
♦KT943
♣98
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♠A 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ W ♠A 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 2-Hullman-Smith
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ W +1 ♠A 1-Schilling-Benich vs 7-Stone-Murdock
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ W +2 ♣9 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
300 0.00 4.00 4♦ N -3 ♣5 10-Benich-Oing vs 5-Benz-Harken
|
22 |
♠AJ74
♥6
♦KQ854
♣854
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.50 0.50 2N S +2 ♥2 10-Benich-Oing vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
180 3.50 0.50 1N S +3 ♥2 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
150 2.00 2.00 2N S +1 ♥2 2-Hullman-Smith vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
120 1.00 3.00 1N S +1 ♥2 7-Stone-Murdock vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
90 0.00 4.00 1N S ♥2 5-Benz-Harken vs 1-Schilling-Benich
|
23 |
♠32
♥A7
♦Q963
♣A9832
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 4.00 0.00 2N E +3 ♣Q 10-Benich-Oing vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
630 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠T 2-Hullman-Smith vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
630 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠T 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
630 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠T 5-Benz-Harken vs 1-Schilling-Benich
630 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠T 7-Stone-Murdock vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
|
24 |
♠Q764
♥AKQ92
♦7
♣T76
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ S -2 ♠A 2-Hullman-Smith vs 8-Sabloff-Dean
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ N -2 ♦7 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Lipton-Perkins
170 2.00 2.00 4♦ W +2 ♥A 5-Benz-Harken vs 1-Schilling-Benich
800 1.00 3.00 5♥* N -4 ♦3 10-Benich-Oing vs 6-Johnston-Ottenberg
920 0.00 4.00 6♦ W ♣A 7-Stone-Murdock vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
|
25 |
♠Q87
♥AKQJ9
♦T97
♣97
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♦4 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 1-Schilling-Benich
150 3.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♦4 10-Benich-Oing vs 7-Stone-Murdock
120 1.50 2.50 1N S +1 ♦4 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
120 1.50 2.50 1N S +1 ♦4 5-Benz-Harken vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
50 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -1 ♥7 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Hullman-Smith
|
26 |
♠T962
♥AQ62
♦J94
♣K2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 6/5♦ 5/4♥ 4♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥2 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♠4 10-Benich-Oing vs 7-Stone-Murdock
690 3.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♥4 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Hullman-Smith
660 1.50 2.50 3N S +2 ♠4 5-Benz-Harken vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
660 1.50 2.50 3N S +2 ♠4 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 1-Schilling-Benich
200 0.00 4.00 6N S -2 ♣8 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
|
27 |
♠QT854
♥J4
♦93
♣8543
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 5♥ E ♣7 10-Benich-Oing vs 7-Stone-Murdock
460 3.00 1.00 3N W +2 ♠4 8-Sabloff-Dean vs 1-Schilling-Benich
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♦5 3-Lipton-Perkins vs 9-Gamble-Llacera
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♦5 5-Benz-Harken vs 4-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♦5 6-Johnston-Ottenberg vs 2-Hullman-Smith
|