1 |
♠AQT985432
♥-
♦A2
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♠ 6NT ♦4 ♥3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ ♣3 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 4.00 0.00 6♠ N ♥K 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
510 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +3 ♥K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
510 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +3 ♥K 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Smith-Smith
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +2 ♥K 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ N ♥K 4-McCabe-Roy vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
|
2 |
♠AKT63
♥74
♦65
♣A654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠8 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠8 4-McCabe-Roy vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
400 2.00 2.00 3N W ♣4 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Smith-Smith
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♠8 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♦7 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
|
3 |
♠QT92
♥KQT65
♦QJ2
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -2 ♦A 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
400 3.00 1.00 3N N ♠A 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♦8 4-McCabe-Roy vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♦3 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
150 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♠A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
4 |
♠K
♥T2
♦AKJ97
♣T9862
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♦2 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♠Q 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥9 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♠Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♠Q 4-McCabe-Roy vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
|
5 |
♠T32
♥A86
♦762
♣9865
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2/1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S ♠Q 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♠Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♠Q 3-Harken-Burk vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♠Q 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♣A 4-McCabe-Roy vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
|
6 |
♠8543
♥K876
♦7
♣K974
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♥3 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
100 2.50 1.50 2♦ E -1 ♠Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
100 2.50 1.50 2♦ E -1 ♣2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Johnson-Loops
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♠A 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
120 0.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♦7 4-McCabe-Roy vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
7 |
♠QT54
♥AJ954
♦-
♣AJ94
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠K 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♣2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♣T 4-McCabe-Roy vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♣2 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
8 |
♠QJT654
♥KJ
♦K7
♣Q62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 1/-♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣4 ♦7/6 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣A 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ N +2 ♣A 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ N +1 ♥A 4-McCabe-Roy vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 0.00 4.00 5♥ E -1 ♠2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
9 |
♠QT863
♥Q97
♦QT5
♣K2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♠7 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
200 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 ♦6 4-McCabe-Roy vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 ♦6 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ E -1 ♦6 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♦7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
10 |
♠93
♥J8
♦KQ732
♣JT32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠4/3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠9 4-McCabe-Roy vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♣K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ W +1 ♠9 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ W +1 ♣J 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Johnson-Loops
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♠3 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
|
11 |
♠8732
♥AJT93
♦JT2
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4/3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♣8 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♣8 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♣2 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Johnson-Loops
100 0.50 3.50 5♠ S -2 ♥7 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -2 ♥8 3-Harken-Burk vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
|
12 |
♠J765
♥T5
♦AJT643
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣0 ♦6 ♥0 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦K 3-Harken-Burk vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♦K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♦K 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
510 0.50 3.50 5♥ W +2 ♣9 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Johnson-Loops
510 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +3 ♣9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
13 |
♠K76543
♥J54
♦-
♣AT63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♠5 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ N ♦3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ N ♣K 3-Harken-Burk vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ W ♠7 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 0.00 4.00 4♠* N -1 ♣K 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
14 |
♠75
♥AT872
♦K97
♣862
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♠ 2NT ♦6/5 ♥4/3 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -3 ♣9 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
150 3.50 0.50 5♣ W -3 ♣2 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Johnson-Loops
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ E -2 ♥5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
130 0.50 3.50 4♣ W ♠5 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
130 0.50 3.50 2♣ W +2 ♦7 3-Harken-Burk vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
|
15 |
♠Q8
♥QT73
♦T975
♣752
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥6 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2N W +2 ♥3 3-Harken-Burk vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
430 2.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Smith-Smith
430 2.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
430 2.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥3 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
490 0.00 4.00 3N E +3 ♠3 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
16 |
♠T82
♥KT4
♦9
♣KJ9854
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ N +1 ♥6 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♦4 3-Harken-Burk vs 2-Johnson-Loops
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ N ♦T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
90 0.50 3.50 1N S ♥3 4-McCabe-Roy vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
90 0.50 3.50 1N S ♦4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
|
17 |
♠KQJ53
♥J
♦A94
♣KQ43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♥6 4-McCabe-Roy vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♥4 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
400 1.00 3.00 5♦ S ♠T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
230 0.00 4.00 3♠ N +3 ♦8 3-Harken-Burk vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
18 |
♠AJ54
♥9
♦863
♣KT742
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♥ 5NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 6♥ W -1 ♠A 3-Harken-Burk vs 2-Johnson-Loops
50 3.50 0.50 6♥ E -1 ♣6 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♥9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
480 0.50 3.50 4♥ W +2 ♠A 4-McCabe-Roy vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
480 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +2 ♦4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
|
19 |
♠AQ8
♥J8752
♦432
♣AQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♠7 4-McCabe-Roy vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♣7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♣7 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♣4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♠7 3-Harken-Burk vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
20 |
♠T2
♥KT9542
♦K87
♣63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3/2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
730 3.88 0.13 3♥* N ♠K 4-McCabe-Roy vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
100 2.63 1.38 3♥ N -1 ♣2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
130 1.38 2.63 3♣ W +1 ♠2 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
200 0.13 3.88 3♥ N -2 ♠A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
|
21 |
♠95
♥AKQ6
♦AKT
♣9643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♠ 2NT ♣6/7 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♦A 3-Harken-Burk vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 3.00 1.00 2N N -1 ♠K 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Smith-Smith
120 2.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♥A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -2 ♦Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Johnson-Loops
500 0.00 4.00 4♠* N -2 ♣K 4-McCabe-Roy vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
|
22 |
♠9742
♥Q875
♦8
♣QJ85
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT3/4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 6♣ E -3 ♦7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
100 3.00 1.00 5♣ E -1 ♥2 4-McCabe-Roy vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ E ♠A 3-Harken-Burk vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ E ♦4 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Smith-Smith
130 0.00 4.00 2♣ E +2 ♦4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
23 |
♠652
♥KT8
♦QT8
♣A875
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♣K 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
120 3.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠4 3-Harken-Burk vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
120 3.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠4 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Smith-Smith
90 0.50 3.50 1N S ♣2 4-McCabe-Roy vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
90 0.50 3.50 1N N ♠4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
24 |
♠AJ4
♥KJ9
♦K96
♣QT83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N W -3 ♣3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Johnson-Loops
100 3.00 1.00 4♦* E -1 ♣A 3-Harken-Burk vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 2.00 2.00 2N W -1 ♣3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♠T 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Smith-Smith
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -3 ♦3 4-McCabe-Roy vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
|
25 |
♠432
♥9654
♦QJ73
♣65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N E ♦5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ E ♦4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Johnson-Loops
630 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠5 3-Harken-Burk vs 1-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
630 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠5 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Smith-Smith
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦4 4-McCabe-Roy vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
|
26 |
♠93
♥K87
♦J3
♣987432
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 ♣T 4-McCabe-Roy vs 2-Johnson-Loops
120 3.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♠5 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
180 2.00 2.00 2N E +2 ♦4 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
200 0.50 3.50 2♦ S -2 ♥9 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 0.50 3.50 2♣ N -2 ♠K 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
|
27 |
♠JT9842
♥J8
♦T3
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠5/4 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 6♥ 2♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.00 0.00 2♥ E +4 ♠7 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ E +1 ♠7 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Smith
460 2.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠J 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♠7 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
510 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +3 ♠7 4-McCabe-Roy vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
28 |
♠J72
♥AKJ4
♦AJT5
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠6 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
600 2.50 1.50 5♦ S ♠9 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
600 2.50 1.50 5♦ N ♦8 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 1.00 3.00 4♥ W -4 ♣Q 4-McCabe-Roy vs 2-Johnson-Loops
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ W -2 ♠7 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
|
29 |
♠AJ94
♥4
♦Q874
♣KJ86
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♦J 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♣7 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Smith
600 2.00 2.00 3N N ♠5 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♣7 4-McCabe-Roy vs 2-Johnson-Loops
|
30 |
♠94
♥T2
♦AKQ6542
♣73
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 3♦ N -1 ♥8 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Stolzberg-Harken
50 3.25 0.75 3♦ N -1 ♥8 3-Harken-Burk vs 5-Smith-Smith
100 0.75 3.25 3♦ N -2 ♥8 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Reiss-Gamble
100 0.75 3.25 3♦ N -2 ♥8 6-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 6-Wesolowski-Millslagle
|