1 |
♠AT9752
♥K83
♦A92
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣2 ♥2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦K 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♦K 3-Nelson-Roy vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♦K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♦K 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Beiers-Williams
400 0.00 4.00 5♣ W ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Loops-Loops
|
2 |
♠875
♥T765
♦T7432
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦2 ♥3/4 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 1.00 3N W +2 ♥5 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
460 3.00 1.00 3N W +2 ♦3 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Beiers-Williams
460 3.00 1.00 3N E +2 ♥4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Loops-Loops
490 0.50 3.50 3N W +3 ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
490 0.50 3.50 3N W +3 ♦3 3-Nelson-Roy vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
|
3 |
♠T752
♥AJ9
♦K953
♣62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 1♠ ♣5/4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1/-NT ♦5 ♠6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1N W ♦3 3-Nelson-Roy vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
90 3.50 0.50 1N E ♦4 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
120 1.50 2.50 1N E +1 ♠3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Loops-Loops
120 1.50 2.50 1N E +1 ♦4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
150 0.00 4.00 1N E +2 ♠3 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Beiers-Williams
|
4 |
♠75
♥AKQ84
♦Q2
♣JT86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥J 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Loops-Loops
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥3 3-Nelson-Roy vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 ♥J 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 3-Beiers-Williams
|
5 |
♠A87
♥K6543
♦AJ
♣QT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦3 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Cowen-Burk
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +2 ♠Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Loops-Loops
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +2 ♠5 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Beiers-Williams
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♦3 3-Nelson-Roy vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
50 0.00 4.00 3♦ E -1 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
|
6 |
♠T87
♥K762
♦KQT2
♣83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3/4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ W +1 ♣8 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
140 3.50 0.50 2♥ W +1 ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Loops-Loops
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ W +2 ♣3 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Beiers-Williams
600 1.00 3.00 3N E ♣4 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Cowen-Burk
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♦2 3-Nelson-Roy vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
|
7 |
♠KJT97
♥Q432
♦T843
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♣ W -1 ♠9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥J 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥J 3-Nelson-Roy vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥J 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Beiers-Williams
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ W +1 ♦8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Loops-Loops
|
8 |
♠Q987
♥Q6543
♦AK5
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 4♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Loops-Loops
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♣3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♣3 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Beiers-Williams
100 1.00 3.00 5♠* S -1 ♣3 3-Nelson-Roy vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ E +2 ♣J 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
9 |
♠742
♥T52
♦87
♣A9432
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4NT ♣6 ♥6/5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♥A 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Loops-Loops
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 ♥2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ W +2 ♥2 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Cowen-Burk
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥A 3-Nelson-Roy vs 3-Beiers-Williams
|
10 |
♠JT4
♥75
♦AK76
♣8654
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Loops-Loops
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♥Q 3-Nelson-Roy vs 3-Beiers-Williams
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♥Q 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
11 |
♠K
♥KQT86
♦KJ2
♣JT54
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -3 ♥K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠4 3-Nelson-Roy vs 3-Beiers-Williams
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 ♥K 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♥K 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Loops-Loops
50 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -1 ♠J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
|
12 |
♠JT62
♥KQ
♦Q7
♣AJ543
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ 4NT ♥3 |
EW: 4♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♠ N +1 ♥A 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 2.63 1.38 4♥* E -1 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
50 1.38 2.63 4♥ E -1 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
420 0.13 3.88 4♥ E ♣K 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 1-Loops-Loops
|
13 |
♠A82
♥QT72
♦A85
♣A93
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♦Q 3-Nelson-Roy vs 2-Cowen-Burk
120 2.50 1.50 1N S +1 ♠T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Beiers-Williams
120 2.50 1.50 1N N +1 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
90 0.50 3.50 1N S ♠T 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Loops-Loops
90 0.50 3.50 2♣ N ♠5 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
|
14 |
♠42
♥K95
♦854
♣K9872
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠0 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 6♥ 7♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 2.00 5♠ W +1 ♦5 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♠4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Beiers-Williams
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♣9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♣J 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Loops-Loops
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♣4 3-Nelson-Roy vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
15 |
♠A5
♥865
♦JT73
♣AT43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 4♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3/2 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.50 0.50 3N S +3 ♠4 3-Nelson-Roy vs 2-Cowen-Burk
690 3.50 0.50 3N S +3 ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
660 1.50 2.50 3N S +2 ♠4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Beiers-Williams
660 1.50 2.50 3N S +2 ♠4 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
630 0.00 4.00 3N S +1 ♠4 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Loops-Loops
|
16 |
♠K874
♥Q86
♦Q73
♣J65
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 2♣ E ♠2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
120 2.50 1.50 1N E +1 ♥4 3-Nelson-Roy vs 2-Cowen-Burk
120 2.50 1.50 1N E +1 ♥4 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Loops-Loops
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ W ♠4 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♦9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Beiers-Williams
|
17 |
♠AK
♥Q84
♦QT843
♣K93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1♦ ♣7/6 ♥6/5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♠3 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
50 1.50 2.50 2N E -1 ♣4 3-Nelson-Roy vs 1-Loops-Loops
50 1.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♦9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 1.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♣4 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
50 1.50 2.50 2♣ E -1 ♦J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Beiers-Williams
|
18 |
♠-
♥K987
♦K9853
♣JT86
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦A 3-Nelson-Roy vs 1-Loops-Loops
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♦A 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♦A 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Beiers-Williams
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
19 |
♠AQT6
♥KT
♦T2
♣QT932
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/-♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥7/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S +1 ♦8 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S +1 ♦8 3-Nelson-Roy vs 1-Loops-Loops
150 2.00 2.00 2♣ N +3 ♦K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Beiers-Williams
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S ♦6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
150 0.00 4.00 2N S -3 ♦8 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
|
20 |
♠KQ2
♥T62
♦KT52
♣J85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 2♦ S +2 ♠8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Beiers-Williams
120 3.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠5 5-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Turnquist-Gunter
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ S ♦7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
110 1.50 2.50 2♦ S +1 ♠8 2-Sevilla-Gift vs 4-Bogaard-McNeal
90 0.00 4.00 2♦ N ♠8 3-Nelson-Roy vs 1-Loops-Loops
|