1 |
♠K54
♥QJ
♦AKQ4
♣JT74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠4 |
EW: 4♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 ♣3 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
100 3.00 1.00 2N N -2 ♥5 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 ♦A 4-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Benich-Benich
300 1.00 3.00 5♦* S -2 ♥A 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦J 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
2 |
♠KJT73
♥K2
♦Q4
♣AK96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4/5 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦5 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♣J 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♦5 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♦5 4-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Benich-Benich
200 0.00 4.00 6♥ S -2 ♠A 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
3 |
♠A74
♥QJ73
♦AK876
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ ♦5 ♥5/6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♦Q 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
150 3.00 1.00 4♣ S +1 ♠5 4-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Benich-Benich
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ S -2 ♦5 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
150 1.00 3.00 3N N -3 ♦Q 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
250 0.00 4.00 4♦ N -5 ♠T 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
|
4 |
♠J984
♥94
♦8765
♣A65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠7 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠7 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠7 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣3 4-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Benich-Benich
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣3 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
|
5 |
♠A64
♥52
♦Q862
♣A985
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ S ♠K 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♣2 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♣6 5-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♣J 4-Grant-Nelson vs 6-Benich-Benich
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♣6 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
|
6 |
♠KJT82
♥T8
♦873
♣K97
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♦K 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N ♥4 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♦K 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Benich-Benich
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥Q 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
150 0.00 4.00 1N S -3 ♦2 4-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
|
7 |
♠AKQ5
♥4
♦Q986
♣AKQ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +3 ♥Q 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Benich-Benich
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♥A 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +2 ♥A 4-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
150 1.00 3.00 2N N +1 ♥Q 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
120 0.00 4.00 1N N +1 ♥A 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
|
8 |
♠AKT9
♥K7
♦AK7
♣A543
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 4.00 0.00 6♦ S ♥J 4-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
490 1.50 2.50 3N N +3 ♠3 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
490 1.50 2.50 3N N +3 ♠3 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
490 1.50 2.50 3N N +3 ♥4 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Benich-Benich
490 1.50 2.50 3N N +3 ♥4 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
|
9 |
♠A42
♥863
♦AJ43
♣943
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦3 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♦3 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W ♦A 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Benich-Benich
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W ♣9 4-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♠A 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
10 |
♠AQ3
♥T8743
♦QT942
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣1 ♥5/4 ♠2/1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 ♦3 4-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
600 3.00 1.00 3N E ♦6 5-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ E ♦6 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♠3 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
690 0.00 4.00 3N E +3 ♠4 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 6-Benich-Benich
|
11 |
♠A85
♥98643
♦A
♣KT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ N ♦Q 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ N ♦2 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Benich-Benich
100 1.50 2.50 2N W -2 ♥3 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
100 1.50 2.50 3♣ W -2 ♦A 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Johnson-Loops
120 0.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♣6 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
|
12 |
♠QT92
♥A976
♦K4
♣QT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦0 ♥4 ♠3/2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♣ W -1 ♠2 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
460 2.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♥3 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
460 2.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♥3 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Benich-Benich
460 2.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♥3 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
490 0.00 4.00 3N E +3 ♥T 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
13 |
♠8643
♥J7
♦K9
♣T8532
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♠ 1/-NT ♦5/4 ♥6/5 ♠7/6 NT7/5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 1N E -1 ♥4 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
100 3.50 0.50 1N E -1 ♥4 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
90 2.00 2.00 1N E ♥4 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
200 0.50 3.50 2N N -2 ♦5 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Benich-Benich
200 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -2 ♦2 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
14 |
♠T6
♥K
♦QT97
♣QT7652
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT4/6 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣2 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Benich-Benich
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ E +1 ♣A 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Johnson-Loops
300 2.00 2.00 4♣* S -2 ♦A 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ E ♣A 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♣7 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
|
15 |
♠AJ8
♥A73
♦KJ9
♣AK65
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4/3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥T 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
100 3.00 1.00 6N N -1 ♠2 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
200 1.00 3.00 6N S -2 ♣7 5-Jones-Henderson vs 6-Benich-Benich
200 1.00 3.00 6N N -2 ♥T 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
200 1.00 3.00 6N N -2 ♥T 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
16 |
♠AQJ62
♥A7
♦Q3
♣AQ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4/3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 4N N +2 ♥7 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥3 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
430 2.00 2.00 4N S ♣3 4-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ N ♦5 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
100 0.00 4.00 6♠ N -2 ♥5 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 6-Benich-Benich
|
17 |
♠J873
♥T7
♦K5
♣Q9872
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 3/2♥ 1♠ 1/-NT ♦6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 ♦K 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 ♠4 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 6-Benich-Benich
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ S -1 ♠A 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ E ♦T 4-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♣A 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
|
18 |
♠J986
♥KQ
♦QT943
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ W ♦4 4-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ E ♥2 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦2 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦2 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 6-Benich-Benich
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦2 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
|
19 |
♠AKQ743
♥752
♦43
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦3 ♥5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦2 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 6-Benich-Benich
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +3 ♣5 4-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 ♦K 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 ♦2 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♥3 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
|
20 |
♠AQ2
♥AT63
♦T96
♣A96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 ♠6/5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N ♥2 4-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
130 3.00 1.00 2♦ S +2 ♠3 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♣5 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♣3 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 6-Benich-Benich
100 0.50 3.50 4♦ S -1 ♥Q 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
21 |
♠AKT7
♥932
♦K62
♣762
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣A 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣A 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣A 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 ♣A 4-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♣A 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
|
22 |
♠Q4
♥K753
♦QT72
♣743
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠Q 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
100 3.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 ♠Q 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
100 3.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 ♠Q 4-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ W ♠Q 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
110 0.00 4.00 2♦ W +1 ♠Q 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
|
23 |
♠Q54
♥K96
♦J4
♣KQT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 5NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠T 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠T 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♦K 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♦K 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ S ♦K 4-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
24 |
♠KJT82
♥J92
♦6
♣K865
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣6 ♦1 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 4.00 0.00 4♠* S ♥A 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
100 3.00 1.00 6♥* E -1 ♣A 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
450 1.50 2.50 5♥ E ♠Q 4-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
450 1.50 2.50 5♥ E ♠2 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
480 0.00 4.00 5♥ E +1 ♠6 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
|
25 |
♠8
♥J652
♦AT7
♣Q7542
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N S ♦9 5-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ S ♦4 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
100 1.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♣3 4-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 ♥7 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 1-Turnquist-Gunter
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♣4 1-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
|
26 |
♠T
♥AQT2
♦KQJ85
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♠Q 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 3-Johnson-Loops
630 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♣6 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
300 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -3 ♦K 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
170 1.00 3.00 3♦ N +3 ♥J 4-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ N +1 ♠A 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 6-Benich-Benich
|
27 |
♠JT65
♥63
♦AK4
♣KQ97
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥2 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♦Q 4-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♦Q 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 6-Benich-Benich
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♦5 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♦T 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
28 |
♠A53
♥Q43
♦A97
♣AJ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♠ 5NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥A 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥A 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥A 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 3-Johnson-Loops
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♦T 4-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
150 0.00 4.00 5♦ E -3 ♠K 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 6-Benich-Benich
|
29 |
♠AT64
♥K92
♦43
♣KQ82
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2/3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠3 2-Turano Jr-Maggipinto vs 3-Johnson-Loops
630 2.50 1.50 3N S +1 ♠7 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
630 2.50 1.50 3N S +1 ♠3 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
600 1.00 3.00 3N N ♦2 4-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♠3 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 6-Benich-Benich
|
30 |
♠T74
♥AT5
♦T4
♣AK654
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠2/3 NT4/5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 3♦ W ♣K 6-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 6-Benich-Benich
130 2.63 1.38 4♦ W ♣A 4-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Nelson-McCabe
140 0.75 3.25 3♠ E ♣7 5-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Millslagle-Wesolowski
140 0.75 3.25 2♠ E +1 ♣7 3-Zinman-Osborn vs 5-Wasserstrom-Winham
|