1 |
♠8
♥QJT74
♦JT87
♣A53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥8 3-Hayes-Burk vs 11-Harken-Murdock
50 3.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥8 5-Ford-Duey vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
50 3.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥8 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
50 3.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♥8 6-Black-Smith vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
170 1.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♦K 9-Simon-Bruno vs 7-Johnson-Keen
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ E ♥8 12-Loops-Osborn vs 1-Burke-Reuben
|
2 |
♠AQ5
♥875
♦K9742
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 ♣J 9-Simon-Bruno vs 7-Johnson-Keen
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ S ♠K 3-Hayes-Burk vs 11-Harken-Murdock
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ S ♣J 5-Ford-Duey vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
50 1.50 3.50 3N W -1 ♦4 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
50 1.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 ♥Q 6-Black-Smith vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
110 0.00 5.00 2♠ W ♦4 12-Loops-Osborn vs 1-Burke-Reuben
|
3 |
♠76
♥K963
♦7642
♣KQ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣6 ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♥3 3-Hayes-Burk vs 11-Harken-Murdock
200 4.50 0.50 2♦* E -1 ♣2 9-Simon-Bruno vs 7-Johnson-Keen
100 3.00 2.00 3♦ E -1 ♣T 5-Ford-Duey vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
100 2.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 ♦K 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
110 1.00 4.00 3♦ E ♣T 6-Black-Smith vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
130 0.00 5.00 2♦ E +2 ♥A 12-Loops-Osborn vs 1-Burke-Reuben
|
4 |
♠K8
♥AQJ983
♦84
♣J65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♣K 12-Loops-Osborn vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
650 4.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♣2 9-Simon-Bruno vs 5-Ford-Duey
170 3.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♦A 7-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
140 2.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 ♣9 6-Black-Smith vs 3-Hayes-Burk
PASS 1.00 4.00 Pass Out 11-Harken-Murdock vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
100 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -1 ♣2 1-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
|
5 |
♠J432
♥754
♦4
♣K9852
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 1♠ ♣1 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 5♦ W -1 ♣2 7-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
50 4.50 0.50 4♦ W -1 ♣K 9-Simon-Bruno vs 5-Ford-Duey
110 3.00 2.00 3♦ W ♣K 6-Black-Smith vs 3-Hayes-Burk
130 1.00 4.00 4♦ W ♣2 1-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
130 1.00 4.00 3♦ W +1 ♣2 11-Harken-Murdock vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
130 1.00 4.00 2♦ W +2 ♣6 12-Loops-Osborn vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
6 |
♠AKQT62
♥AK
♦J82
♣T3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 6♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♥2 7-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
450 4.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♣5 6-Black-Smith vs 3-Hayes-Burk
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ N ♥9 11-Harken-Murdock vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ N ♣Q 9-Simon-Bruno vs 5-Ford-Duey
200 1.00 4.00 3♠ N +2 ♣K 1-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
170 0.00 5.00 3♠ N +1 ♣K 12-Loops-Osborn vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
7 |
♠A76
♥Q9732
♦K63
♣64
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 1/2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠5 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
660 4.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♦A 7-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
630 3.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♦A 1-Burke-Reuben vs 6-Black-Smith
130 1.00 4.00 4♣ S ♠9 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Simon-Bruno
130 1.00 4.00 4♣ S ♠2 11-Harken-Murdock vs 5-Ford-Duey
130 1.00 4.00 3♣ S +1 ♠9 12-Loops-Osborn vs 3-Hayes-Burk
|
8 |
♠K3
♥AK
♦T942
♣KT765
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♦7 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Simon-Bruno
430 3.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♦7 7-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
430 3.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♦7 12-Loops-Osborn vs 3-Hayes-Burk
430 3.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♣3 11-Harken-Murdock vs 5-Ford-Duey
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ S ♣2 1-Burke-Reuben vs 6-Black-Smith
400 0.00 5.00 3N N ♠A 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
|
9 |
♠KT5
♥J97
♦KQT4
♣K42
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.50 0.50 1♥ E +1 ♦9 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
110 4.50 0.50 1♥ E +1 ♦8 11-Harken-Murdock vs 5-Ford-Duey
140 1.50 3.50 3♥ E ♦9 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Simon-Bruno
140 1.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♦5 1-Burke-Reuben vs 6-Black-Smith
140 1.50 3.50 1♥ E +2 ♣8 7-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
140 1.50 3.50 1♥ E +2 ♣8 12-Loops-Osborn vs 3-Hayes-Burk
|
10 |
♠AKT
♥2
♦762
♣KQT874
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦3/4 ♥3/4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 ♣3 11-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Black-Smith
130 4.00 1.00 4♦ E ♣2 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 7-Johnson-Keen
170 3.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♣2 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 5-Ford-Duey
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ E ♣9 3-Hayes-Burk vs 1-Burke-Reuben
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ E ♣3 12-Loops-Osborn vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ E ♣2 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 9-Simon-Bruno
|
11 |
♠A3
♥T965
♦QJ873
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.50 0.50 2♥ S ♦K 11-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Black-Smith
110 4.50 0.50 2♥ S ♣A 12-Loops-Osborn vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
50 3.00 2.00 5♣ W -1 ♠A 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 5-Ford-Duey
50 1.50 3.50 3♥ S -1 ♠7 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 9-Simon-Bruno
50 1.50 3.50 3♥ S -1 ♦4 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 7-Johnson-Keen
110 0.00 5.00 3♣ W ♥T 3-Hayes-Burk vs 1-Burke-Reuben
|
12 |
♠JT53
♥98
♦KT652
♣K4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ W ♦2 11-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Black-Smith
140 2.00 3.00 3♥ W ♠J 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 9-Simon-Bruno
140 2.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♠J 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 5-Ford-Duey
140 2.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♠3 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 7-Johnson-Keen
140 2.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♠3 12-Loops-Osborn vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
140 2.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♦6 3-Hayes-Burk vs 1-Burke-Reuben
|
13 |
♠82
♥K6
♦AQ9
♣AKT854
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 4♦ 4♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 5.00 0.00 6N S +1 ♥3 7-Johnson-Keen vs 11-Harken-Murdock
1390 3.50 1.50 6♣ N +1 ♠Q 12-Loops-Osborn vs 5-Ford-Duey
1390 3.50 1.50 6♣ N +1 ♠5 9-Simon-Bruno vs 6-Black-Smith
720 2.00 3.00 3N S +4 ♥3 1-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
650 0.50 4.50 5♠ S ♥3 4-Spencer-Suddards vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
650 0.50 4.50 4♠ S +1 ♥3 3-Hayes-Burk vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
|
14 |
♠J6
♥932
♦JT9865
♣QJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 2♠ E +2 ♦K 1-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
200 3.50 1.50 3♠ E +2 ♦K 3-Hayes-Burk vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
200 3.50 1.50 3♠ E +2 ♦K 9-Simon-Bruno vs 6-Black-Smith
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♥A 4-Spencer-Suddards vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♦K 12-Loops-Osborn vs 5-Ford-Duey
450 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 ♥A 7-Johnson-Keen vs 11-Harken-Murdock
|
15 |
♠AJ92
♥K54
♦K6
♣7542
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♠2 3-Hayes-Burk vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
50 4.50 0.50 2N E -1 ♠6 12-Loops-Osborn vs 5-Ford-Duey
90 3.00 2.00 1N W ♠2 7-Johnson-Keen vs 11-Harken-Murdock
120 1.50 3.50 2N W ♠2 9-Simon-Bruno vs 6-Black-Smith
120 1.50 3.50 1N W +1 ♠2 4-Spencer-Suddards vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
210 0.00 5.00 1N W +4 ♠2 1-Burke-Reuben vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
|
16 |
♠K9742
♥963
♦92
♣J72
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♦ W +1 ♣2 12-Loops-Osborn vs 6-Black-Smith
120 3.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♠4 1-Burke-Reuben vs 7-Johnson-Keen
120 3.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♠4 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 11-Harken-Murdock
180 1.50 3.50 2N W +2 ♠9 4-Spencer-Suddards vs 9-Simon-Bruno
180 1.50 3.50 1N W +3 ♠4 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
600 0.00 5.00 3N W ♠4 5-Ford-Duey vs 3-Hayes-Burk
|
17 |
♠T43
♥752
♦QT643
♣J6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 3♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♥ W +2 ♦3 5-Ford-Duey vs 3-Hayes-Burk
430 4.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♦2 4-Spencer-Suddards vs 9-Simon-Bruno
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♠2 12-Loops-Osborn vs 6-Black-Smith
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♦2 1-Burke-Reuben vs 7-Johnson-Keen
940 1.00 4.00 6♣ E +1 ♦2 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
990 0.00 5.00 6N W ♦4 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 11-Harken-Murdock
|
18 |
♠KQ52
♥-
♦AJ9752
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3/4♠ 3/4NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 1♠ N +3 ♦3 12-Loops-Osborn vs 6-Black-Smith
130 4.00 1.00 3♦ N +1 ♥A 4-Spencer-Suddards vs 9-Simon-Bruno
100 3.00 2.00 3♥* W -1 ♠K 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 11-Harken-Murdock
100 2.00 3.00 5♦ N -1 ♥A 5-Ford-Duey vs 3-Hayes-Burk
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♦A 1-Burke-Reuben vs 7-Johnson-Keen
420 0.00 5.00 4♥ W ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
|
19 |
♠AQJT7
♥KQT87
♦-
♣Q97
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5/6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣5 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 3-Hayes-Burk
420 4.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣2 12-Loops-Osborn vs 7-Johnson-Keen
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♦9 6-Black-Smith vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ N ♥A 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
50 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♣4 5-Ford-Duey vs 1-Burke-Reuben
50 0.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♣4 11-Harken-Murdock vs 9-Simon-Bruno
|
20 |
♠83
♥JT8754
♦T872
♣5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣5 5-Ford-Duey vs 1-Burke-Reuben
100 4.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♣5 12-Loops-Osborn vs 7-Johnson-Keen
100 3.00 2.00 4♣ S -1 ♥A 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 3-Hayes-Burk
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ W ♣5 6-Black-Smith vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
110 1.50 3.50 2♠ E ♥J 11-Harken-Murdock vs 9-Simon-Bruno
140 0.00 5.00 3♠ W ♣5 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
|
21 |
♠K98632
♥K
♦T962
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 0.00 1N E +1 ♣6 5-Ford-Duey vs 1-Burke-Reuben
200 4.00 1.00 1N S -2 ♣7 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
400 1.50 3.50 3N E ♠Q 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 3-Hayes-Burk
400 1.50 3.50 3N E ♥3 6-Black-Smith vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
400 1.50 3.50 3N E ♥3 11-Harken-Murdock vs 9-Simon-Bruno
400 1.50 3.50 3N E ♥3 12-Loops-Osborn vs 7-Johnson-Keen
|
22 |
♠KQ743
♥AQ7
♦8
♣JT87
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/4♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT4/5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ ♣5/4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♦9 6-Black-Smith vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
170 4.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♦9 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
140 2.50 2.50 3♠ N ♦9 7-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Ford-Duey
140 2.50 2.50 2♠ N +1 ♥6 11-Harken-Murdock vs 1-Burke-Reuben
100 0.50 4.50 3♥ E -1 ♣A 3-Hayes-Burk vs 9-Simon-Bruno
100 0.50 4.50 3♦ W -1 ♠K 12-Loops-Osborn vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
|
23 |
♠Q
♥AK
♦AT982
♣K8753
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠8 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
660 4.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠4 12-Loops-Osborn vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
150 3.00 2.00 2N N +1 ♥4 6-Black-Smith vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
130 2.00 3.00 3♣ S +1 ♥8 7-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Ford-Duey
110 1.00 4.00 2♦ N +1 ♠8 11-Harken-Murdock vs 1-Burke-Reuben
90 0.00 5.00 2♦ N ♠8 3-Hayes-Burk vs 9-Simon-Bruno
|
24 |
♠A86
♥KT9843
♦K53
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥8 12-Loops-Osborn vs 8-Hilton-Cramblet
50 4.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♥T 11-Harken-Murdock vs 1-Burke-Reuben
400 3.00 2.00 5♣ E ♥2 10-Faircrest-Walker vs 4-Spencer-Suddards
430 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥8 6-Black-Smith vs 2-Wesolowski-Henderson
480 1.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♣4 7-Johnson-Keen vs 5-Ford-Duey
490 0.00 5.00 3N W +3 ♥8 3-Hayes-Burk vs 9-Simon-Bruno
|
25 |
♠Q54
♥T63
♦QJ
♣AQT53
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT5/6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣5 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 6-Black-Smith
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♣K 12-Loops-Osborn vs 9-Simon-Bruno
170 1.50 3.50 3♥ E +1 ♣K 5-Ford-Duey vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
170 1.50 3.50 3♥ E +1 ♣K 7-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Hayes-Burk
170 1.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 ♠9 4-Spencer-Suddards vs 1-Burke-Reuben
170 1.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 ♣2 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 11-Harken-Murdock
|
26 |
♠986
♥53
♦A43
♣AQ876
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♦A 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 11-Harken-Murdock
230 4.00 1.00 3♠ W +3 ♥5 12-Loops-Osborn vs 9-Simon-Bruno
650 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥5 4-Spencer-Suddards vs 1-Burke-Reuben
650 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥5 7-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Hayes-Burk
650 1.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 ♦Q 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 6-Black-Smith
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 ♦A 5-Ford-Duey vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
|
27 |
♠A7
♥8
♦KJ9765
♣K854
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♦7 12-Loops-Osborn vs 9-Simon-Bruno
50 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♦Q 5-Ford-Duey vs 10-Faircrest-Walker
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ E ♦Q 7-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Hayes-Burk
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♦Q 2-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 11-Harken-Murdock
170 1.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 ♦Q 8-Hilton-Cramblet vs 6-Black-Smith
200 0.00 5.00 3♥ E +2 ♦Q 4-Spencer-Suddards vs 1-Burke-Reuben
|