1 |
♠QT76
♥KQ84
♦T9
♣QJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♠6 9-Winham-Harken vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
100 4.50 1.50 2N W -2 ♠6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Roy-Nelson
100 4.50 1.50 1N W -2 ♠6 5-Modest-Gunter vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
PASS 2.50 3.50 Pass Out 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
PASS 2.50 3.50 Pass Out 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
90 1.00 5.00 2♣ W ♥K 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
120 0.00 6.00 1N E +1 ♦2 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Ording-Ording
|
2 |
♠T
♥T4
♦T98
♣KQJ9653
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5/4 ♥4 |
EW: 2♦ 2/1♥ ♣3/2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 1♠ S +2 ♥J 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
130 5.00 1.00 4♣ N ♥A 5-Modest-Gunter vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
80 4.00 2.00 1♠ S ♦3 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
50 2.50 3.50 3♥ E -1 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Roy-Nelson
50 2.50 3.50 3♥ E -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
100 1.00 5.00 5♣ N -1 ♥A 9-Winham-Harken vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
110 0.00 6.00 3♦ E ♠T 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Ording-Ording
|
3 |
♠87
♥J982
♦K543
♣T54
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
140 5.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥4 5-Modest-Gunter vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
110 4.00 2.00 2♠ S ♥6 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
100 2.50 3.50 3♠ S -2 ♥6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Roy-Nelson
100 2.50 3.50 3♠ S -2 ♥6 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
110 1.00 5.00 2♥ E ♠9 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Ording-Ording
150 0.00 6.00 4♠ S -3 ♣3 9-Winham-Harken vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
|
4 |
♠653
♥74
♦K643
♣A863
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3/2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣3 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Loops-Loops
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ W ♦3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Tainty-Harken
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ W ♦3 9-Winham-Harken vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
140 4.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♠6 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 1-Roy-Nelson
170 1.50 4.50 3♥ W +1 ♦3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
170 1.50 4.50 2♥ W +2 ♠6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
620 0.00 6.00 4♥ W ♦3 5-Modest-Gunter vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
|
5 |
♠KQ3
♥954
♦J65
♣J742
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥5 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 ♠K 5-Modest-Gunter vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
90 5.00 1.00 2♣ E ♠9 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Loops-Loops
100 3.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♣8 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
100 3.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♣8 9-Winham-Harken vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
110 2.00 4.00 3♣ E ♥6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.50 5.50 2♦ W +2 ♠K 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Tainty-Harken
130 0.50 5.50 4♣ E ♠9 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
6 |
♠J42
♥AKT42
♦J
♣A432
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 6.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♦7 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Tainty-Harken
480 4.50 1.50 4♥ S +2 ♠T 9-Winham-Harken vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
480 4.50 1.50 4♥ S +2 ♣9 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 1-Roy-Nelson
460 2.50 3.50 3N S +2 ♣9 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
460 2.50 3.50 3N N +2 ♦3 5-Modest-Gunter vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
400 1.00 5.00 3N S ♦3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
170 0.00 6.00 2♥ N +2 ♦A 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
7 |
♠QT64
♥A964
♦5
♣A754
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 6.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦6 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Ording-Ording
200 5.00 1.00 3♦ E -2 ♣8 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
150 4.00 2.00 1N S +2 ♦4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
140 3.00 3.00 3♠ S ♦A 9-Winham-Harken vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
100 1.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♠9 3-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Loops-Loops
100 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 ♦4 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 5.00 4♠ S -1 ♣3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
8 |
♠52
♥QJ75
♦QJ9742
♣5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 4N E -1 ♠3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Ording-Ording
180 5.00 1.00 2N E +2 ♦6 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
400 4.00 2.00 3N E ♦T 3-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Loops-Loops
430 2.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Roy-Nelson
430 2.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠3 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
460 1.00 5.00 3N E +2 ♠3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
490 0.00 6.00 3N E +3 ♠4 9-Winham-Harken vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
|
9 |
♠KJ8
♥53
♦KJT84
♣632
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠A 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Ording-Ording
100 5.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♣J 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.50 2.50 4♦ N -1 ♥A 9-Winham-Harken vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
50 3.50 2.50 4♣ S -1 ♥4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Roy-Nelson
140 2.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♦7 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
170 1.00 5.00 3♥ E +1 ♠A 3-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Loops-Loops
620 0.00 6.00 4♥ E ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
|
10 |
♠Q953
♥A72
♦KQ42
♣KJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 5.50 0.50 3N S +3 ♠T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Ording-Ording
690 5.50 0.50 3N S +3 ♦5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
660 4.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♥8 9-Winham-Harken vs 5-Tainty-Harken
630 2.50 3.50 3N S +1 ♠2 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Loops-Loops
630 2.50 3.50 3N S +1 ♥J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
150 1.00 5.00 2N S +1 ♠2 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Roy-Nelson
100 0.00 6.00 3N S -1 ♥3 3-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
|
11 |
♠AT96
♥Q92
♦K82
♣K94
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 6.00 0.00 2♣ W ♥2 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Loops-Loops
110 4.50 1.50 3♦ E ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Ording-Ording
110 4.50 1.50 3♣ W ♠A 3-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
150 3.00 3.00 2N W +1 ♠6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
170 1.50 4.50 2♠ E +2 ♦4 9-Winham-Harken vs 5-Tainty-Harken
170 1.50 4.50 2♣ W +4 ♠T 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Roy-Nelson
430 0.00 6.00 3N W +1 ♥2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
|
12 |
♠97
♥84
♦QJ542
♣KJ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥1/2 ♠2/3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♣4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
50 4.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♦4 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Loops-Loops
50 4.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Ording-Ording
400 3.00 3.00 3N W ♦4 9-Winham-Harken vs 5-Tainty-Harken
420 2.00 4.00 4♥ W ♦Q 3-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
450 0.50 5.50 4♥ W +1 ♦4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
450 0.50 5.50 4♥ W +1 ♣9 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
13 |
♠AQ2
♥J962
♦84
♣Q975
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠3 9-Winham-Harken vs 4-Ording-Ording
110 4.50 1.50 1♥ E +1 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Loops-Loops
110 4.50 1.50 2♣ E +1 ♠6 3-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Roy-Nelson
130 3.00 3.00 3♣ E +1 ♠3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
600 1.50 4.50 3N E ♠3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
600 1.50 4.50 3N E ♦2 5-Modest-Gunter vs 5-Tainty-Harken
630 0.00 6.00 3N W +1 ♥2 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
|
14 |
♠984
♥A7
♦JT97
♣J872
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 3♣ E -3 ♥5 9-Winham-Harken vs 4-Ording-Ording
50 4.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♣K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
50 4.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♣K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Loops-Loops
110 2.50 3.50 2♠ E ♥6 5-Modest-Gunter vs 5-Tainty-Harken
110 2.50 3.50 2♠ E ♣K 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
140 1.00 5.00 2♠ E +1 ♣K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.00 6.00 4♥ S -3 ♠2 3-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
15 |
♠K98
♥QT642
♦AT3
♣K9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5/6 NT5 |
EW: -/1♣ -/1♦ -/1♥ 1♠ -/1NT ♣6/7 ♦6/7 ♥6/7 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♥9 5-Modest-Gunter vs 5-Tainty-Harken
50 4.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♥4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
50 4.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♥4 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
50 4.00 2.00 2♣ W -1 ♥4 9-Winham-Harken vs 4-Ording-Ording
90 2.00 4.00 1N W ♥4 3-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Roy-Nelson
100 1.00 5.00 1N S -1 ♣J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
300 0.00 6.00 1N S -3 ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
16 |
♠JT72
♥KJ6
♦8
♣T9854
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♦9 3-Cowen-Burk vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
100 5.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Tainty-Harken
100 5.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣J 9-Winham-Harken vs 3-Loops-Loops
50 2.50 3.50 2♦ S -1 ♥7 5-Modest-Gunter vs 4-Ording-Ording
50 2.50 3.50 2♦ N -1 ♥7 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
110 1.00 5.00 2♥ E ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
620 0.00 6.00 4♥ E ♣J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
|
17 |
♠AK9642
♥-
♦A42
♣Q983
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 1♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.50 1.50 4♠ N +2 ♥7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
480 4.50 1.50 4♠ N +2 ♥3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Tainty-Harken
480 4.50 1.50 4♠ N +2 ♦8 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
480 4.50 1.50 4♠ N +2 ♦7 5-Modest-Gunter vs 4-Ording-Ording
460 2.00 4.00 3N S +2 ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
450 1.00 5.00 4♠ N +1 ♥9 9-Winham-Harken vs 3-Loops-Loops
230 0.00 6.00 3♠ N +3 ♦8 3-Cowen-Burk vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠986
♥AQ543
♦J43
♣KJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♥ N ♦5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
100 5.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♣3 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
50 3.00 3.00 3N E -1 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Tainty-Harken
50 3.00 3.00 3N E -1 ♦7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
50 3.00 3.00 2♠ W -1 ♦3 9-Winham-Harken vs 3-Loops-Loops
100 1.00 5.00 2♦ S -1 ♠J 5-Modest-Gunter vs 4-Ording-Ording
150 0.00 6.00 2N W +1 ♥4 3-Cowen-Burk vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠A876
♥953
♦53
♣KQ73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦0 ♥1 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 6NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 6.00 0.00 3♦ W +1 ♣K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Ording-Ording
150 5.00 1.00 3♦ W +2 ♣3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
620 4.00 2.00 5♦ W +1 ♠A 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 5-Tainty-Harken
680 2.50 3.50 4♥ W +2 ♦5 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
680 2.50 3.50 4♥ E +2 ♠J 5-Modest-Gunter vs 3-Loops-Loops
710 1.00 5.00 4♥ E +3 ♠J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Roy-Nelson
720 0.00 6.00 3N W +4 ♠6 3-Cowen-Burk vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
|
20 |
♠AKJ93
♥T42
♦64
♣954
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 6.00 0.00 3♦ E +1 ♠4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Ording-Ording
200 5.00 1.00 2♠ N -2 ♦A 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 5-Tainty-Harken
630 4.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♠2 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
650 3.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
660 2.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♠2 5-Modest-Gunter vs 3-Loops-Loops
690 1.00 5.00 3N E +3 ♠7 3-Cowen-Burk vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
1370 0.00 6.00 6♦ E ♠2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
21 |
♠AQ876
♥KJT9
♦87
♣Q6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Roy-Nelson
140 4.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♦A 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
140 4.50 1.50 3♥ N ♦A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
50 3.00 3.00 3♦ E -1 ♠K 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 5-Tainty-Harken
90 2.00 4.00 2♦ E ♠K 3-Cowen-Burk vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
110 1.00 5.00 3♦ E ♠K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Ording-Ording
120 0.00 6.00 1N E +1 ♠K 5-Modest-Gunter vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
22 |
♠AQJ53
♥92
♦T94
♣876
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 6.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣A 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 4-Ording-Ording
200 4.50 1.50 4♣ W -2 ♦T 5-Modest-Gunter vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
200 4.50 1.50 3♣ W -2 ♦T 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
140 3.00 3.00 3♠ N ♣A 3-Cowen-Burk vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
100 1.50 4.50 3N E -1 ♦7 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.50 4.50 4♣ W -1 ♠Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Tainty-Harken
50 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -1 ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠K4
♥Q82
♦Q7543
♣Q76
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 2♥ E +1 ♦9 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Tainty-Harken
170 3.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦9 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
170 3.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦8 3-Cowen-Burk vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
170 3.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦8 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 4-Ording-Ording
170 3.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♠A 5-Modest-Gunter vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
170 3.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♦9 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
620 0.00 6.00 4♥ E ♥4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
|
24 |
♠AJ2
♥K943
♦8743
♣95
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♣4 3-Cowen-Burk vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
50 5.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♣9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
130 3.50 2.50 2♦ W +2 ♣9 5-Modest-Gunter vs 2-Jacobs-Reuben
130 3.50 2.50 2♦ W +2 ♣9 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 4-Ording-Ording
140 2.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♠5 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
400 0.50 5.50 3N W ♣9 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
400 0.50 5.50 3N E ♣4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
25 |
♠K765
♥J85
♦Q98
♣QT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4/5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♠6 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
200 5.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♠6 5-Modest-Gunter vs 1-Roy-Nelson
120 4.00 2.00 2N W ♦7 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Tainty-Harken
150 3.00 3.00 2N W +1 ♦7 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 3-Loops-Loops
600 1.50 4.50 3N W ♦7 3-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
600 1.50 4.50 3N E ♠5 9-Winham-Harken vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
630 0.00 6.00 3N W +1 ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
|
26 |
♠AJT852
♥Q
♦J53
♣KQT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♠T 5-Modest-Gunter vs 1-Roy-Nelson
620 5.00 1.00 4♥ W ♠2 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 3-Loops-Loops
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠T 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Tainty-Harken
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠5 3-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠2 9-Winham-Harken vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♠K 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
|
27 |
♠J9653
♥JT85
♦A3
♣53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4/5 NT3 |
EW: 5/4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.92 0.08 3♥ N -1 ♣5 7-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Tainty-Harken
100 4.17 1.83 4♥ N -2 ♦J 6-Millslagle-Lasser vs 3-Loops-Loops
100 4.17 1.83 4♥ N -2 ♣5 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Davidson-Suddards
150 2.42 3.58 4♥ N -3 ♠6 3-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Raphael-Kelly
300 1.25 4.75 4♥* N -2 ♣5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 8-Stolzberg-Riley
500 0.08 5.92 4♥* N -3 ♦J 5-Modest-Gunter vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|