1 |
♠AQJ87
♥J85
♦T98
♣Q6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3/2♣ 3♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♠A 8-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♠3 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
90 1.00 2.00 1N W ♠8 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W ♠A 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
|
2 |
♠QT8
♥KQ
♦JT92
♣K873
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 0.00 1N N +3 ♦3 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
140 2.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♣5 8-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
200 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♠2 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
200 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -2 ♣T 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
|
3 |
♠AQT853
♥Q5
♦96
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♦ W -1 ♠A 8-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 ♥A 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 ♦J 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
600 0.00 3.00 5♦ W ♠A 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
|
4 |
♠A9
♥Q3
♦T653
♣AQ432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 1N W -2 ♣3 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
90 2.00 1.00 1N W ♣3 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
120 1.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♠2 8-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
150 0.00 3.00 1N W +2 ♣2 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
|
5 |
♠AJT
♥A5
♦QJ4
♣KJ843
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦6/7 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♠3 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
120 2.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♦7 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
100 1.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♥8 8-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♦Q 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
|
6 |
♠A82
♥AT3
♦J
♣AQT542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠5 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
170 2.00 1.00 3♣ N +3 ♠3 8-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
150 1.00 2.00 3♣ N +2 ♠J 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
130 0.00 3.00 3♣ N +1 ♠J 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
|
7 |
♠A
♥AKQJ95
♦Q9
♣KT43
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 7♥ 5/4♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 2.00 1.00 6N S +1 ♠J 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
1470 2.00 1.00 6N S +1 ♠J 8-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
1470 2.00 1.00 6N S +1 ♣Q 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
1460 0.00 3.00 6♥ N +1 ♦J 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
|
8 |
♠742
♥52
♦Q64
♣QJ974
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1/-♥ 5♠ 3NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ W ♥5 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
450 1.50 1.50 5♠ W ♥5 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♥5 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
800 0.00 3.00 5♥* S -4 ♦3 8-Zinman-Karter vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
9 |
♠Q9
♥T92
♦QT6
♣QT742
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5/6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♠3 8-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♣A 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
50 0.50 2.50 1N N -1 ♠3 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
50 0.50 2.50 1N N -1 ♠3 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
10 |
♠Q53
♥AQ53
♦J876
♣T5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 3NT ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 3.00 0.00 4♠* S ♦4 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
620 2.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥J 8-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♥J 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ S +1 ♦4 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
11 |
♠A95
♥JT54
♦KT62
♣J9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N W ♥4 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
120 1.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♥4 8-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
120 1.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♦2 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
150 0.00 3.00 1N W +2 ♥4 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
|
12 |
♠AK96
♥AK964
♦73
♣74
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3/2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♣ E -4 ♥J 8-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
150 2.00 1.00 2♣ E -3 ♥J 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
100 1.00 2.00 2♣ E -2 ♥J 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♣A 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
13 |
♠AK875
♥T5
♦QJT754
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦2 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3♦ N +2 ♣4 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
130 2.00 1.00 4♦ N ♥4 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
100 1.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♣3 8-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
500 0.00 3.00 5♣ N -5 ♠Q 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
|
14 |
♠K9853
♥QJT3
♦95
♣A8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ -/1NT ♣5 ♦6 NT5/7 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♦ ♣7/6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♦7 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
140 2.00 1.00 3♥ N ♣K 8-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ N ♠7 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
100 0.00 3.00 3♦ E -2 ♠A 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
|
15 |
♠832
♥Q752
♦K93
♣865
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦3/4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 1.50 4♦ E -1 ♠A 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
50 1.50 1.50 4♦ E -1 ♠A 8-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
50 1.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 ♠A 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
50 1.50 1.50 3♦ E -1 ♠K 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
16 |
♠T7
♥654
♦K9865
♣962
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♣6 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣9 8-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣2 5-Burke-Faircrest vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣2 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
|
17 |
♠98
♥9854
♦743
♣T753
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♠* W -1 ♦7 8-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
50 2.00 1.00 2N S -1 ♦K 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
100 0.50 2.50 3N S -2 ♦K 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
100 0.50 2.50 4♣ S -2 ♦K 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
|
18 |
♠7532
♥A5
♦KT4
♣Q763
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 3.00 0.00 6♠ S ♦7 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ S +2 ♦7 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ S +2 ♦7 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
680 1.00 2.00 4♠ S +2 ♦7 8-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
|
19 |
♠KJT742
♥AQJ8
♦AT
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 4♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 1.50 1.50 6♠ S ♠A 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
980 1.50 1.50 6♠ S ♠A 8-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
980 1.50 1.50 6♠ N ♠8 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
980 1.50 1.50 6♠ N ♥4 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
|
20 |
♠KQ43
♥A3
♦Q42
♣9765
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣7/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N E +1 ♠4 6-Slinger-Slinger vs 1-Andrews-Andrews
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ E +2 ♣Q 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
200 1.00 2.00 3♥ E +2 ♠A 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E ♥T 8-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
|
21 |
♠K
♥AJ5
♦T87642
♣QJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♥7 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦K 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♦K 8-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦K 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
|
22 |
♠T84
♥KQ6532
♦2
♣542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ -/1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♣ E -1 ♥8 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ E +1 ♥9 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ E +1 ♦A 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
200 0.00 3.00 4♦ S -4 ♣Q 8-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
|
23 |
♠AKQ9
♥KQT75
♦92
♣K2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦0 ♥0 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 3.00 0.00 6♥ N ♣3 8-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
720 2.00 1.00 3N S +4 ♦6 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
710 0.50 2.50 4♥ N +3 ♠T 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
710 0.50 2.50 4♥ N +3 ♣3 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
24 |
♠KT953
♥A82
♦42
♣A93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦2/1 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 5♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 ♦4 3-Chase-Feldstein vs 4-Oppenheimer-Walker
50 2.00 1.00 6♦ W -1 ♦4 8-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 ♦4 7-Winham-Avenmarg vs 2-Wesolowski-Reuben
400 0.00 3.00 5♦ W ♦4 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
|
25 |
♠A9764
♥T
♦A86
♣9754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♣ N -2 ♦Q 8-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
120 1.50 1.50 2N E ♥A 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
120 1.50 1.50 1N E +1 ♥6 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
150 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -3 ♦3 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
|
26 |
♠83
♥A98
♦9864
♣A542
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.50 0.50 1♦ E +3 ♠T 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
130 2.50 0.50 1♦ E +3 ♣K 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♥4 8-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ E ♣K 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
|
27 |
♠A6
♥K762
♦KJ932
♣Q4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥6/4 NT4 |
EW: 3/4♣ 1/3NT ♦5 ♥5/6 ♠3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 5♣ E -2 ♠Q 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
100 2.50 0.50 5♣ E -2 ♠Q 8-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
50 1.00 2.00 4♣ E -1 ♠Q 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
180 0.00 3.00 2N W +2 ♦3 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
|
28 |
♠AK74
♥AQT72
♦96
♣JT
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ -/2♠ -/1NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠6/8 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ N ♠6 8-Zinman-Karter vs 7-Winham-Avenmarg
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 ♥4 1-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Chase-Feldstein
120 1.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♥7 4-Oppenheimer-Walker vs 5-Burke-Faircrest
180 0.00 3.00 2N W +2 ♠A 2-Wesolowski-Reuben vs 6-Slinger-Slinger
|