1 |
♠QJ6
♥Q9
♦A8642
♣JT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 4.00 0.00 Pass Out 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 4-Haley-Gunter
50 3.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♠2 1-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Modest-Keen
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ E ♥T 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♠8 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♣5 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
|
2 |
♠5
♥QT94
♦943
♣KQ642
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♣8 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 4-Haley-Gunter
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♣K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
120 2.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♣4 1-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Modest-Keen
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♣K 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♣K 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
3 |
♠KQJT876
♥65
♦Q8
♣QT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 4.00 0.00 6♠ S +1 ♦3 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 4-Haley-Gunter
50 1.50 2.50 6♠ S -1 ♥A 1-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Modest-Keen
50 1.50 2.50 6♠ S -1 ♥A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
50 1.50 2.50 6♠ N -1 ♥A 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
50 1.50 2.50 6♠ N -1 ♥2 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
|
4 |
♠AT
♥T83
♦K984
♣J852
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♠A 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 4-Haley-Gunter
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦4 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W ♦4 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
200 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +3 ♣3 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♣2 1-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Modest-Keen
|
5 |
♠KT73
♥J5
♦532
♣K954
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠5 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 4-Haley-Gunter
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣A 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ S +1 ♠5 1-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Modest-Keen
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ S +2 ♦A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ S +1 ♥T 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
6 |
♠2
♥AKT874
♦K65
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣5/4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♠T 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Haley-Gunter
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣K 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
50 1.50 2.50 5♥ N -1 ♠T 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Modest-Keen
50 1.50 2.50 5♥ N -1 ♠7 1-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
100 0.00 4.00 6♥ N -2 ♠T 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
7 |
♠8
♥AQ93
♦AK5
♣QJT65
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠K 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♠A 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ N +1 ♥7 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Haley-Gunter
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ N +1 ♥7 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Modest-Keen
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ E -1 ♥4 1-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
8 |
♠J9875
♥A42
♦94
♣Q42
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Modest-Keen
50 3.00 1.00 2♦ S -1 ♠K 1-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
120 2.00 2.00 2N W ♠7 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
150 1.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♦5 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠7 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Haley-Gunter
|
9 |
♠K84
♥T6
♦A95
♣AK963
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♦ 6/5♥ 4/3♠ 5NT ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♠A 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Haley-Gunter
480 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♦7 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♠A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Modest-Keen
200 0.50 3.50 3♥ S +2 ♦7 1-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
200 0.50 3.50 2♥ S +3 ♣Q 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
10 |
♠K5
♥9752
♦KT92
♣QT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -2 ♥9 1-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W ♥7 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 4-Haley-Gunter
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W ♦2 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W ♦2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Modest-Keen
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥2 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
|
11 |
♠JT965
♥KJ72
♦K
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦T 1-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥T 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 1-Modest-Keen
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥T 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥8 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
50 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♥T 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
12 |
♠6
♥T852
♦J532
♣K982
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 1♠ S +1 ♥3 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 ♦K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
80 2.00 2.00 1♠ S ♣J 1-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♦K 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -1 ♥3 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 1-Modest-Keen
|
13 |
♠KJ52
♥98762
♦5
♣Q92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2/1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥9 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 1-Modest-Keen
120 3.00 1.00 2N E ♥K 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
150 2.00 2.00 2N W +1 ♥9 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♦K 1-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
600 0.50 3.50 3N E ♦K 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
14 |
♠AJ643
♥Q
♦QT97
♣KQ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 6♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣0 ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +3 ♦3 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
510 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +3 ♦2 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ S +2 ♦3 1-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ S +2 ♦3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
300 0.00 4.00 6N S -6 ♥6 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 1-Modest-Keen
|
15 |
♠KQJ4
♥K9873
♦A
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 1♥ ♣5/6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N W ♠K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
100 2.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♣2 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦6 1-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦6 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
300 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -3 ♦6 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 1-Modest-Keen
|
16 |
♠KQT753
♥Q2
♦A
♣AKJ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1510 3.50 0.50 7♠ N ♠2 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
1510 3.50 0.50 7♠ N ♦3 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 1-Modest-Keen
1010 2.00 2.00 6♠ N +1 ♦3 1-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
510 0.50 3.50 5♠ N +2 ♦4 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
510 0.50 3.50 4♠ N +3 ♦3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Haley-Gunter
|
17 |
♠AK
♥QJ742
♦K432
♣52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4/5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N ♠T 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 ♠T 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Haley-Gunter
50 2.50 1.50 2♥ N -1 ♠T 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
100 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -2 ♣6 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 1-Modest-Keen
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -2 ♠T 1-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
|
18 |
♠652
♥QJ75
♦J96
♣985
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ E ♠4 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Haley-Gunter
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♥6 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 1-Modest-Keen
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♣7 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♣6 1-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 ♠A 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
19 |
♠Q752
♥8652
♦QT3
♣K3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -4 ♥6 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
100 3.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥3 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 1-Modest-Keen
600 1.00 3.00 3N W ♠2 1-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
600 1.00 3.00 3N W ♠2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Haley-Gunter
600 1.00 3.00 3N W ♥6 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
20 |
♠J
♥J8
♦T986
♣KT8542
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣J 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Haley-Gunter
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 ♣A 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ E +2 ♥T 1-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
230 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +3 ♣9 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♥9 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 1-Modest-Keen
|
21 |
♠AJ3
♥J764
♦QT98
♣T7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♣ S +1 ♠5 1-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♣A 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Modest-Keen
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♣A 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♣K 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♠7 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
|
22 |
♠76532
♥65
♦AQ84
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♠9 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
630 3.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♥2 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Modest-Keen
630 3.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♣2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
660 0.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠9 1-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
660 0.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠9 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
23 |
♠A7
♥AJT87
♦A
♣A9652
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥2 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Modest-Keen
200 3.00 1.00 3♥* N -1 ♦5 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
400 1.50 2.50 3N N -4 ♠8 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
400 1.50 2.50 4♣ N -4 ♠J 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
800 0.00 4.00 4♥* S -3 ♠K 1-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
|
24 |
♠KJ7
♥AT
♦KQ82
♣JT98
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N ♠5 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♠5 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Modest-Keen
120 2.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♠5 1-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
120 2.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♠5 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W ♣J 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|
25 |
♠KQ92
♥876
♦J
♣AKQ92
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣J 2-Hasey-Nelson vs 4-Haley-Gunter
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♣J 3-Avenmarg-Suddards vs 1-Modest-Keen
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♣J 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Kerner-Wasserstrom
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ E ♣4 1-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Wesolowski-McCabe
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ E ♣4 5-Evenden-Spencer vs 5-Reiss-Gamble
|