1 |
♠KJ92
♥T2
♦J87
♣AQ96
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 5♦ -/1♥ 3♠ 4NT ♥6/7 |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.88 0.13 3N S +1 ♥A 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 8-Harken-Harken
400 2.63 1.38 5♦ S ♥A 9-Keen-Walker vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
150 0.75 3.25 3♦ S +2 ♥A 6-Faircrest-Feldstein vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
150 0.75 3.25 2♦ S +3 ♥A 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Burke-Reuben
|
2 |
♠QJT
♥QJ863
♦T62
♣Q9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.88 0.13 5♥* W -4 ♠Q 9-Keen-Walker vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
620 2.63 1.38 4♠ S ♥A 6-Faircrest-Feldstein vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
500 1.38 2.63 4♥* W -3 ♠Q 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 8-Harken-Harken
200 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 ♥A 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Burke-Reuben
|
3 |
♠94
♥QJT84
♦853
♣532
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4/3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4/-NT NT10/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.88 0.13 2N W ♥4 9-Keen-Walker vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
150 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -3 ♠2 6-Faircrest-Feldstein vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
150 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -3 ♣6 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 8-Harken-Harken
680 0.13 3.88 4♠ E +2 ♥A 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Burke-Reuben
|
4 |
♠73
♥AT742
♦82
♣KJ52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♣7/6 ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.25 0.75 2♦ N +2 ♠A 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Burke-Reuben
130 3.25 0.75 2♦ N +2 ♠A 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Zinman-Karter
110 0.75 3.25 3♦ S ♠2 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
110 0.75 3.25 3♦ S ♥5 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
|
5 |
♠QJ87
♥9432
♦53
♣K53
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2/3 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 4♣ W +2 ♦5 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
400 2.63 1.38 3N W ♥2 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ E ♦8 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Zinman-Karter
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ E ♦6 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Burke-Reuben
|
6 |
♠J
♥J2
♦Q98754
♣J952
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.25 0.75 4♥ S ♠3 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
420 3.25 0.75 4♥ S ♠3 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
170 1.38 2.63 3♥ S +1 ♠3 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Burke-Reuben
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ E -1 ♥A 8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
7 |
♠5
♥J54
♦98654
♣QJ65
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2♠ E -1 ♦T 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♦T 6-Faircrest-Feldstein vs 3-Burke-Reuben
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +2 ♦T 9-Keen-Walker vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
620 0.13 3.88 4♠ E ♦T 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
8 |
♠K
♥AT984
♦964
♣AQ93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♠ E -2 ♥2 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 2.63 1.38 5♥ N -2 ♣J 9-Keen-Walker vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
420 0.75 3.25 4♠ E ♥2 6-Faircrest-Feldstein vs 3-Burke-Reuben
420 0.75 3.25 4♠ E ♥2 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
|
9 |
♠83
♥KQ962
♦632
♣863
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦1 ♠1/3 NT1 |
EW: 5♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT5/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 3♠ W -1 ♣3 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 3.25 0.75 3♦ E -1 ♣K 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
150 1.38 2.63 3♦ E +2 ♣A 9-Keen-Walker vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
650 0.13 3.88 4♠ W +1 ♣3 6-Faircrest-Feldstein vs 3-Burke-Reuben
|
10 |
♠Q43
♥9
♦J4
♣AKQ7653
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦0 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 6♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.88 0.13 4♥ E +1 ♠8 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
680 1.38 2.63 5♥ E +1 ♣J 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Zinman-Karter
680 1.38 2.63 4♥ E +2 ♣J 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
680 1.38 2.63 4♥ E +2 ♣J 9-Keen-Walker vs 8-Harken-Harken
|
11 |
♠K3
♥K865
♦A86
♣AT74
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2/3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N N ♥7 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
120 2.63 1.38 1N N +1 ♣2 9-Keen-Walker vs 8-Harken-Harken
50 1.38 2.63 3N N -1 ♣2 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -2 ♣2 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
12 |
♠96
♥T84
♦AJT2
♣9743
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.88 0.13 3♠* E -4 ♣A 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
600 2.63 1.38 3N S ♠T 9-Keen-Walker vs 8-Harken-Harken
100 0.75 3.25 3N S -1 ♠J 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 0.75 3.25 3N S -1 ♠J 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
13 |
♠KJ96
♥76
♦QT84
♣542
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ W ♦4 4-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
230 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +3 ♦4 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 3-Burke-Reuben
230 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +4 ♦4 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 9-Keen-Walker
230 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +4 ♦4 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
|
14 |
♠AKQT7
♥7
♦AKJ82
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣4 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠0 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♠J 4-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♠J 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 3-Burke-Reuben
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥K 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥K 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 9-Keen-Walker
|
15 |
♠AK8
♥J9762
♦754
♣87
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 3♣* W -4 ♠A 4-Zinman-Karter vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ E -3 ♠2 8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
90 1.50 2.50 1N S ♠4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
90 1.50 2.50 1N S ♠3 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 3-Burke-Reuben
100 0.00 4.00 1N N -1 ♠9 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 9-Keen-Walker
|
16 |
♠KQJ3
♥T2
♦A42
♣A982
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5/6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 5♥* E -1 ♣4 3-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Harken-Harken
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 ♥K 9-Keen-Walker vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ E +1 ♣K 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ E +1 ♣4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♣4 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
17 |
♠QT87642
♥Q4
♦-
♣QJ98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♦4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
420 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣A 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♥2 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
50 1.00 3.00 5♦ W -1 ♣Q 9-Keen-Walker vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
100 0.00 4.00 5♠* N -1 ♦4 3-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Harken-Harken
|
18 |
♠J9765
♥Q92
♦Q832
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥A 9-Keen-Walker vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♥6 3-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Harken-Harken
100 2.00 2.00 2N W -2 ♠5 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥J 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥T 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
19 |
♠AK9
♥J92
♦QT9
♣JT98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2/3♦ 4/5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 4.00 0.00 3N N +4 ♥6 6-Faircrest-Feldstein vs 8-Harken-Harken
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♥5 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♥5 3-Burke-Reuben vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ S +3 ♥5 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
50 0.00 4.00 6♠ S -1 ♥5 4-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Keen-Walker
|
20 |
♠Q853
♥Q3
♦A84
♣AKQ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♠6 6-Faircrest-Feldstein vs 8-Harken-Harken
180 3.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♥4 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
150 1.50 2.50 2N N +1 ♠T 3-Burke-Reuben vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
150 1.50 2.50 1N N +2 ♠T 4-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Keen-Walker
120 0.00 4.00 1N N +1 ♠T 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
|
21 |
♠KQ65
♥A2
♦AKQJ6
♣KQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠J 3-Burke-Reuben vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
630 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♣5 6-Faircrest-Feldstein vs 8-Harken-Harken
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♥6 4-Zinman-Karter vs 9-Keen-Walker
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ N +1 ♣3 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 5-Burtch-Claussen
200 0.00 4.00 6♦ S -2 ♠9 1-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
|
22 |
♠74
♥AJT4
♦AJ4
♣QJ64
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 1/2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ S -1 ♦K 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 9-Keen-Walker
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ S -1 ♣A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Harken-Harken
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -2 ♦K 4-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Burke-Reuben
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -2 ♣A 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W ♣4 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
|
23 |
♠Q92
♥Q63
♦AK4
♣T854
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♥7 4-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Burke-Reuben
120 2.50 1.50 2N N ♥7 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 9-Keen-Walker
120 2.50 1.50 2N N ♥4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Harken-Harken
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♥8 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
100 0.50 3.50 2N N -1 ♥7 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
|
24 |
♠85
♥Q543
♦9
♣AT9743
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1/-♣ 3♦ 5/4♥ 4/3♠ 4NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣A 7-Johnson-Osborn vs 9-Keen-Walker
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦9 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Harken-Harken
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦9 4-Zinman-Karter vs 3-Burke-Reuben
430 1.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♦9 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 6-Faircrest-Feldstein
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♦9 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
|
25 |
♠Q9
♥AKT9865
♦64
♣K8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 NT3 |
EW: 3/2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4NT ♠5/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 4♦ W ♥A 3-Burke-Reuben vs 9-Keen-Walker
150 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -3 ♦J 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
150 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -3 ♦2 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
600 0.13 3.88 5♦ W ♥A 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
26 |
♠843
♥9643
♦QJ73
♣AT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5/4 ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 4♥ W -2 ♠3 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♠K 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -1 ♠3 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ E ♠K 3-Burke-Reuben vs 9-Keen-Walker
|
27 |
♠6
♥AKQ52
♦85
♣J9763
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ 1♥ 6♠ 4NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 5♠ W -2 ♥A 3-Burke-Reuben vs 9-Keen-Walker
450 1.38 2.63 4♠ W +1 ♥A 5-Burtch-Claussen vs 4-Zinman-Karter
450 1.38 2.63 4♠ W +1 ♥A 8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Sterling-Llacera
450 1.38 2.63 4♠ W +1 ♥A 10-Wesolowski-Cowen vs 7-Johnson-Osborn
|