1 |
♠KJT5
♥J8
♦987
♣KQ75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♥ E -1 ♣A 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Harken-Harken
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♠2 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♠9 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♥4 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Johnson-Loops
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♦J 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
|
2 |
♠AT86
♥73
♦K95
♣Q985
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♥6 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Johnson-Loops
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♦3 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♣2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ E +1 ♠9 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ E +1 ♣A 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Harken-Harken
|
3 |
♠KQJ865
♥K973
♦J
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♠A 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Johnson-Loops
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♥8 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♣9 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Harken-Harken
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♣3 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
400 0.00 4.00 3N S ♥5 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
|
4 |
♠86
♥6543
♦AK62
♣982
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 4/3♣ 1♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 ♣J 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Johnson-Loops
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ E ♠K 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
110 2.50 1.50 2♣ E +1 ♠K 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
130 1.00 3.00 2♣ E +2 ♥2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♣4 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
|
5 |
♠Q983
♥3
♦973
♣AK875
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 1♠ ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4/5♦ 4♥ 1/4NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 4♥ E -1 ♦6 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
50 3.25 0.75 4♥ E -1 ♣T 1-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Harken-Harken
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ E ♦6 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 3-Johnson-Loops
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ E ♦6 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
|
6 |
♠Q9432
♥Q983
♦43
♣75
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5/4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♠3 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 3-Johnson-Loops
200 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♦4 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Harken-Harken
200 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♣7 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ W -1 ♦4 1-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♦4 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
|
7 |
♠T543
♥JT94
♦Q8
♣KT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 1/-♥ 4♠ 4NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 4.00 0.00 2N E +3 ♥3 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
630 3.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♥3 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 3-Johnson-Loops
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♥3 1-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♥3 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♥3 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Harken-Harken
|
8 |
♠AK8762
♥-
♦AJT864
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♦ 7♠ 2/3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♥ ♣6/7 ♦0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 4.00 0.00 6♠ N +1 ♦7 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
510 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +3 ♦7 1-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
510 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +3 ♦7 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Harken-Harken
510 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +3 ♦7 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 3-Johnson-Loops
510 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +3 ♣2 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
|
9 |
♠8
♥8532
♦AJT43
♣AK5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N N ♥A 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ N ♥A 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 3-Johnson-Loops
50 2.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 ♥A 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Harken-Harken
100 1.00 3.00 2♦ N -2 ♥A 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -3 ♣9 1-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
|
10 |
♠K542
♥43
♦T65
♣6543
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 1.17 3N W -1 ♠2 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
100 2.83 1.17 4♦ E -1 ♣K 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 1-Harken-Harken
630 0.33 3.67 3N W +1 ♠2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
|
11 |
♠94
♥Q4
♦JT97532
♣T4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♦A 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Harken-Harken
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♦A 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♦A 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 3-Johnson-Loops
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♣Q 1-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
500 0.00 4.00 5♦* N -3 ♣A 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
|
12 |
♠Q964
♥986
♦T
♣Q9842
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4/3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣4 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Harken-Harken
50 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♣7 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
110 1.50 2.50 2♦ W +1 ♥9 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
110 1.50 2.50 2♦ W +1 ♥8 1-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ W +1 ♥9 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
13 |
♠8542
♥9543
♦97
♣K98
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5/4♣ 2/1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ W ♠2 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 3-Johnson-Loops
120 3.00 1.00 2N E ♦4 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Harken-Harken
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ W +2 ♠8 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
600 0.50 3.50 3N W ♦9 1-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
600 0.50 3.50 3N W ♦9 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
|
14 |
♠Q985
♥AJ82
♦Q8732
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 5♥ S ♠A 1-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠A 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 3-Johnson-Loops
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♥Q 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Harken-Harken
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ S ♣7 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ S +1 ♥Q 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
|
15 |
♠J43
♥T963
♦AJ43
♣Q6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 6♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣1/0 ♦3 ♠1/0 NT1/0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.00 0.00 3N N +4 ♠T 1-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣9 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣4 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 1-Harken-Harken
130 1.00 3.00 2♣ S +2 ♣4 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♥5 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
16 |
♠KJ
♥K87652
♦A8
♣A32
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦4/5 ♥3 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♠2 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♠2 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Harken-Harken
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♠2 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
100 1.00 3.00 5♥ N -2 ♠Q 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
300 0.00 4.00 5♥* N -2 ♠Q 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
|
17 |
♠653
♥AJ654
♦987
♣A3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6/5 ♥5 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♦A 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Harken-Harken
100 3.00 1.00 3♥* W -1 ♥4 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
50 2.00 2.00 2N E -1 ♠7 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
140 1.00 3.00 1♥ E +2 ♠7 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
400 0.00 4.00 3N E ♠7 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
|
18 |
♠KJT652
♥T8
♦2
♣K984
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 2♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♥J 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
660 3.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♦4 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
620 1.50 2.50 5♦ S +1 ♥J 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
620 1.50 2.50 5♦ S +1 ♥J 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
240 0.00 4.00 2N S +4 ♣2 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Harken-Harken
|
19 |
♠KT76
♥AK973
♦AJ
♣K7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦T 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +2 ♦5 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ N ♦5 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
50 0.50 3.50 1♥ N -1 ♠8 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
50 0.50 3.50 1♥ N -1 ♦2 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Harken-Harken
|
20 |
♠K3
♥852
♦9876
♣K653
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣2 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 1-Harken-Harken
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♣3 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
630 2.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♦9 1-Grant-Nelson vs 3-Johnson-Loops
660 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♦9 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
660 0.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠5 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
|
21 |
♠AQ8752
♥AKJ2
♦76
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 2.00 5♠ N +1 ♥9 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
680 2.00 2.00 5♠ N +1 ♦J 1-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +2 ♥9 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Harken-Harken
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +2 ♣A 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +2 ♦A 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
|
22 |
♠Q72
♥73
♦K76542
♣A9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥1 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3/2♣ 5♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 1.00 5♦ N -3 ♠J 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
150 3.00 1.00 4♦ N -3 ♠J 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
150 3.00 1.00 4♦ N -3 ♠5 1-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♥7 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♣A 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Harken-Harken
|
23 |
♠-
♥95
♦KQ3
♣AKJT8753
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 1♥ 4♠ 7NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥4/5 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1440 4.00 0.00 6N N ♦6 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
660 2.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♥3 1-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
660 2.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♥3 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
640 1.00 3.00 5♣ N +2 ♦J 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Harken-Harken
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ S ♥3 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
|
24 |
♠QJ943
♥K
♦A865
♣K98
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3/5♦ 3/4♥ 2♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -2 ♠8 1-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -2 ♠8 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -2 ♠2 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Harken-Harken
100 2.50 1.50 3♦ E -2 ♠8 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
50 0.00 4.00 4♣ W -1 ♥K 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
|
25 |
♠9864
♥KJ63
♦Q
♣T863
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N E +1 ♥2 2-Hasey-Oppenheimer vs 4-Turnquist-Keen
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♥3 1-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Winham-Wasserstrom
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♥2 5-Gamble-Reiss vs 5-Millslagle-Avenmarg
600 2.00 2.00 3N E ♥2 4-Schamberg-Dykstra vs 3-Johnson-Loops
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♦5 3-Shipman Jr-Smith vs 1-Harken-Harken
|