1 |
♠A98
♥AK96
♦AQ3
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1/-♠ 3NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.25 0.75 3N N +2 ♦6 9-Smith-Suddards vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
460 3.25 0.75 3N N +2 ♦6 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Burke-Reuben
430 0.75 3.25 3N N +1 ♦6 6-Evenden-Hill vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
430 0.75 3.25 3N N +1 ♦6 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
2 |
♠72
♥KQ98
♦KJ53
♣QT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ W ♠2 6-Evenden-Hill vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ W ♦3 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ W ♣7 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Burke-Reuben
140 0.13 3.88 2♠ W +1 ♠2 9-Smith-Suddards vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
3 |
♠QJ93
♥3
♦T93
♣AKJ86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.88 0.13 4♠ S +2 ♦A 6-Evenden-Hill vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
450 2.00 2.00 5♠ S ♥K 9-Smith-Suddards vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 8-Burke-Reuben
420 0.13 3.88 4♠ S ♠6 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
4 |
♠KQT3
♥JT954
♦95
♣T2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♠ S +1 ♠2 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Evenden-Hill
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ N ♥A 8-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 1.38 2.63 2♠ S -1 ♠4 1-Keen-McDuff vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
300 0.13 3.88 2N S -3 ♠4 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
5 |
♠Q9
♥JT4
♦JT6
♣KT876
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1/2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2♠ S -1 ♥A 1-Keen-McDuff vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
170 2.63 1.38 3♥ E +1 ♣9 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
420 1.38 2.63 4♥ E ♠A 8-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
800 0.13 3.88 2♠* S -3 ♥A 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Evenden-Hill
|
6 |
♠AT863
♥AQ97
♦A4
♣97
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 5/6♥ 2/3♠ 2/3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥1 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 2♥ N +3 ♦J 1-Keen-McDuff vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
170 2.63 1.38 1♥ S +3 ♠7 8-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 1.38 2.63 2♠ S -1 ♦J 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Evenden-Hill
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ E ♠Q 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
|
7 |
♠T952
♥AQT2
♦QT8
♣A2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.88 0.13 2N S ♣3 6-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠8 9-Smith-Suddards vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
100 2.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♠J 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Keen-McDuff
200 0.13 3.88 3N S -2 ♠J 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
8 |
♠QJ4
♥AQT9
♦98
♣AQ92
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2/1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.25 0.75 2N N +2 ♥2 6-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
180 3.25 0.75 1N N +3 ♠A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
120 1.38 2.63 1N N +1 ♥2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Keen-McDuff
90 0.13 3.88 1N N ♥2 9-Smith-Suddards vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
|
9 |
♠Q6
♥K63
♦KJ9542
♣A2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 3/4NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.88 0.13 4♠* W -3 ♥3 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
200 2.63 1.38 2♥ S +3 ♦A 9-Smith-Suddards vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
170 1.38 2.63 4♦ N +2 ♠K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Keen-McDuff
140 0.13 3.88 2♥ S +1 ♦A 6-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
10 |
♠AKQ82
♥A42
♦KQ76
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1/4NT ♣5/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠3/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.88 0.13 4♥ S +1 ♠3 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
620 2.63 1.38 4♥ S ♦J 1-Keen-McDuff vs 6-Evenden-Hill
110 1.38 2.63 1♠ N +1 ♥Q 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
300 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -3 ♣J 9-Smith-Suddards vs 8-Burke-Reuben
|
11 |
♠JT93
♥J97
♦KJT2
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 3.25 0.75 Pass Out 1-Keen-McDuff vs 6-Evenden-Hill
PASS 3.25 0.75 Pass Out 9-Smith-Suddards vs 8-Burke-Reuben
50 1.38 2.63 3♠ S -1 ♥Q 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
110 0.13 3.88 3♣ E ♠2 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
12 |
♠K32
♥AKT4
♦AK8
♣K52
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.25 0.75 5♦* W -2 ♦A 9-Smith-Suddards vs 8-Burke-Reuben
300 3.25 0.75 5♦* W -2 ♦A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
100 1.38 2.63 5♥ S -1 ♠9 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ W ♥A 1-Keen-McDuff vs 6-Evenden-Hill
|
13 |
♠AQT8
♥AK8764
♦KQ3
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5/6 ♦5 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♦ ♣6/7 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 2.00 6♠ S -2 ♣A 4-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Evenden-Hill
200 2.00 2.00 6♠ N -2 ♣A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
200 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♦6 8-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
200 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -2 ♣A 1-Keen-McDuff vs 9-Smith-Suddards
200 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 ♣7 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
14 |
♠T97
♥KJ843
♦J7
♣KT5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♥4 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ E +2 ♠6 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
400 1.50 2.50 3N W ♥4 1-Keen-McDuff vs 9-Smith-Suddards
400 1.50 2.50 3N E ♣2 8-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥4 4-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Evenden-Hill
|
15 |
♠Q5
♥Q542
♦T3
♣J9652
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 5♠ W ♥2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♣5 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♣5 8-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
480 0.50 3.50 5♠ W +1 ♦T 4-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Evenden-Hill
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 ♥2 1-Keen-McDuff vs 9-Smith-Suddards
|
16 |
♠953
♥AK542
♦-
♣AQJT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2/1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 5♥ N ♠A 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦5 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦2 9-Smith-Suddards vs 6-Evenden-Hill
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠A 3-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Burke-Reuben
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♠8 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Keen-McDuff
|
17 |
♠T86
♥T
♦KJ74
♣QJT73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♦A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Keen-McDuff
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♣Q 9-Smith-Suddards vs 6-Evenden-Hill
50 2.00 2.00 4♦ S -1 ♠A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 0.50 3.50 4♦ S -2 ♠A 3-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Burke-Reuben
100 0.50 3.50 4♦ S -2 ♠A 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
18 |
♠A72
♥KQ86
♦A97
♣A85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2/3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♥6 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ E -1 ♥9 3-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Burke-Reuben
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♦4 9-Smith-Suddards vs 6-Evenden-Hill
200 1.00 3.00 3♦ S -2 ♠K 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Keen-McDuff
300 0.00 4.00 4♦ S -3 ♠K 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
|
19 |
♠AK72
♥T4
♦876
♣9762
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2/1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♦2 1-Keen-McDuff vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
100 2.50 1.50 3♦ S -2 ♠J 3-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
100 2.50 1.50 3♦ S -2 ♠J 4-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 9-Smith-Suddards
200 1.00 3.00 2N N -4 ♣K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
870 0.00 4.00 2♠* W +1 ♥T 6-Evenden-Hill vs 8-Burke-Reuben
|
20 |
♠KT6
♥A82
♦KT75
♣T98
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 4♦ 4NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 1.00 3N N ♥K 3-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
600 3.00 1.00 3N N ♥K 6-Evenden-Hill vs 8-Burke-Reuben
600 3.00 1.00 5♦ S ♥6 1-Keen-McDuff vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ S +2 ♥6 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ S +1 ♥6 4-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 9-Smith-Suddards
|
21 |
♠Q9743
♥75
♦AQJ7
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ N ♠J 1-Keen-McDuff vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ N ♦T 3-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 2-Avenmarg-Chase
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♠A 4-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 9-Smith-Suddards
50 1.50 2.50 4♥ E -1 ♠A 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Johnson-Osborn
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♥4 6-Evenden-Hill vs 8-Burke-Reuben
|
22 |
♠8
♥JT876
♦AQJ
♣AQ95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♥6 4-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
120 3.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠3 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 9-Smith-Suddards
50 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♦2 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Keen-McDuff
50 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♠4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Burke-Reuben
100 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 ♦2 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Evenden-Hill
|
23 |
♠J63
♥Q9862
♦JT3
♣63
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♦ W -1 ♣6 4-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
120 3.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♣Q 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Keen-McDuff
140 2.00 2.00 1♠ E +2 ♥K 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Evenden-Hill
200 0.50 3.50 1N S -2 ♦2 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Burke-Reuben
200 0.50 3.50 1N S -2 ♦2 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 9-Smith-Suddards
|
24 |
♠AK
♥KQ
♦AQT84
♣QT98
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♦6 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Keen-McDuff
430 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♠J 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 6-Evenden-Hill
430 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♠8 4-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 3-Wasserstrom-Smith
430 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♠8 7-Sterling-Llacera vs 9-Smith-Suddards
430 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♠6 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 8-Burke-Reuben
|
25 |
♠AQ874
♥64
♦KT76
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3♥ W -2 ♦6 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
150 2.63 1.38 1N W +2 ♦6 8-Burke-Reuben vs 1-Keen-McDuff
180 0.75 3.25 1N W +3 ♠7 3-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 9-Smith-Suddards
180 0.75 3.25 1N W +3 ♠7 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
26 |
♠98
♥965
♦J9864
♣Q86
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 6♠ E -1 ♣A 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 2.63 1.38 3♠ E ♦3 3-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 9-Smith-Suddards
200 1.38 2.63 3♠ W +2 ♥5 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
620 0.13 3.88 4♠ E ♦3 8-Burke-Reuben vs 1-Keen-McDuff
|
27 |
♠AKQT84
♥T97
♦T
♣963
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ 2/3♠ ♣4/5 ♦4/5 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.25 0.75 3♠ N ♣7 10-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 7-Sterling-Llacera
140 3.25 0.75 2♠ N +1 ♥5 3-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 9-Smith-Suddards
50 0.75 3.25 4♠ N -1 ♣K 8-Burke-Reuben vs 1-Keen-McDuff
50 0.75 3.25 3♠ N -1 ♣7 5-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Rodgers-Feldstein
|