| 1 |
♠8532
♥A
♦J952
♣KT95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♣7 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -2 ♥5 1-Osborn-Stone vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -2 ♦A 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 4-Loops-Loops
130 0.00 4.00 4♣ E ♥K 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
|
| 2 |
♠964
♥AT32
♦T65
♣432
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3/2♠ 3/2NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♣7 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
50 3.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♣7 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
400 1.50 2.50 3N E ♠7 1-Osborn-Stone vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
400 1.50 2.50 3N E ♣7 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 4-Loops-Loops
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♣9 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
|
| 3 |
♠AJ53
♥A9854
♦-
♣AQ84
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT ♦7/6 |
| EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ N ♥K 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 4-Loops-Loops
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥K 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♦J 1-Osborn-Stone vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ N ♦J 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
150 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -3 ♦J 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
|
| 4 |
♠JT8
♥QT754
♦4
♣A953
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 5♠ W -1 ♦4 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥5 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♥4 1-Osborn-Stone vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 ♦4 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 4-Loops-Loops
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♦4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
|
| 5 |
♠A62
♥432
♦T962
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 4♦ 5♥ 2/1♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ E +1 ♠Q 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♣3 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 4-Loops-Loops
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠Q 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠4 1-Osborn-Stone vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣3 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
| 6 |
♠87
♥Q3
♦Q9763
♣Q975
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 6♣ 5♦ 1♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♥3 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ W +2 ♥Q 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 4-Loops-Loops
200 2.50 1.50 3♠ W +2 ♥3 1-Osborn-Stone vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
230 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +4 ♥Q 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♥Q 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
|
| 7 |
♠K
♥AQ8743
♦Q62
♣KJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 4/5♥ 2/3♠ 4NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦A 1-Osborn-Stone vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣9 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.00 3.00 6♥ N -1 ♦A 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 4-Loops-Loops
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦A 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
|
| 8 |
♠KQJ
♥Q3
♦AQT63
♣963
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦2/3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
400 3.00 1.00 3N N ♣J 1-Osborn-Stone vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S ♦5 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
50 1.00 3.00 1♥ W -1 ♠K 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♥2 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 4-Loops-Loops
|
| 9 |
♠82
♥-
♦AJ652
♣QJ9432
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 3♠ 4NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥3 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 ♥9 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♥9 1-Osborn-Stone vs 4-Loops-Loops
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♦8 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
|
| 10 |
♠Q87542
♥63
♦AJ54
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♦K 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ E -2 ♠A 1-Osborn-Stone vs 4-Loops-Loops
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♥A 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ E -1 ♠A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E ♦K 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
|
| 11 |
♠AT753
♥8743
♦82
♣A2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♥K 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥K 1-Osborn-Stone vs 4-Loops-Loops
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♣6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♥K 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♥K 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
|
| 12 |
♠A9543
♥T2
♦QJ2
♣974
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♣ E -1 ♠J 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
150 2.50 1.50 1N E +2 ♥3 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
150 2.50 1.50 2♣ E +3 ♠7 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
460 0.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠7 1-Osborn-Stone vs 4-Loops-Loops
460 0.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♥3 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
|
| 13 |
♠642
♥QT972
♦63
♣752
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠5 |
| EW: 3/2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S ♥6 1-Osborn-Stone vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♥6 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♠A 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 4-Loops-Loops
100 1.00 3.00 3♦ S -1 ♠7 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
100 1.00 3.00 3♦ S -1 ♣Q 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
|
| 14 |
♠-
♥93
♦AKT32
♣AQ9654
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N S -1 ♣2 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
50 3.50 0.50 4♣ N -1 ♠Q 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 4-Loops-Loops
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -2 ♠2 1-Osborn-Stone vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -2 ♣2 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♠2 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
|
| 15 |
♠A982
♥Q82
♦A542
♣A8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♣ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1N S ♣2 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
90 3.50 0.50 1N S ♣2 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.50 2.50 2N N -1 ♥4 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 4-Loops-Loops
100 1.50 2.50 1N S -1 ♠3 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
200 0.00 4.00 1N S -2 ♠3 1-Osborn-Stone vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
|
| 16 |
♠KJ942
♥A7
♦T753
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦4/3 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 2♥ S +2 ♦6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
170 3.50 0.50 2♥ S +2 ♣6 1-Osborn-Stone vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S ♣3 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
100 1.00 3.00 5♣ W -1 ♠Q 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ E ♥K 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 4-Loops-Loops
|
| 17 |
♠3
♥AJ9742
♦T9
♣T863
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Loops-Loops
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♦2 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -2 ♦T 1-Osborn-Stone vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W ♦T 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
| 18 |
♠93
♥QT52
♦JT98643
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦0 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♠ S +1 ♣4 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
170 3.50 0.50 4♦ N +2 ♥8 1-Osborn-Stone vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
150 1.50 2.50 3♥ W -3 ♠2 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
150 1.50 2.50 3♥ W -3 ♦6 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ S ♣4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Loops-Loops
|
| 19 |
♠T642
♥K2
♦K42
♣AJT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥6 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ S ♣9 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Loops-Loops
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ S ♣9 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♥K 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 1-Osborn-Stone vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
|
| 20 |
♠K762
♥64
♦K432
♣864
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥* E -1 ♦A 1-Osborn-Stone vs 2-Shoemaker-Graves
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠3 3-Downing-Tidmore vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♥A 5-Davidson-Formoso vs 5-Cowen-Beiers
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E ♦A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Loops-Loops
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♣5 4-Rodrigues-Keeley vs 3-Johnson-Hahn
|