1 |
♠-
♥J85
♦T954
♣KQ9873
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1♦ 2/1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N S ♠3 7-Modest-Loops vs 3-Wainer-Nelson
150 2.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♠3 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♥J 9-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Shvestha-Osborn
150 0.00 3.00 3♣ S -3 ♠J 10-Cowen-Loops vs 8-Davidson-Downing
|
2 |
♠T8
♥J53
♦QJ84
♣9653
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2/1♦ ♥5/4 ♠4 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♦Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ W ♦4 7-Modest-Loops vs 3-Wainer-Nelson
140 0.50 2.50 3♠ W ♥J 9-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Shvestha-Osborn
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ W +1 ♦Q 10-Cowen-Loops vs 8-Davidson-Downing
|
3 |
♠K92
♥K6
♦AK96543
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 5♥ 4NT ♣4 ♠4/5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦1 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 0.50 5♦ N +1 ♠Q 8-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
420 2.50 0.50 5♦ N +1 ♥A 1-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Wainer-Nelson
400 1.00 2.00 5♦ N ♥A 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 2-Shvestha-Osborn
50 0.00 3.00 5♥ S -1 ♦7 10-Cowen-Loops vs 9-Winham-Murdock
|
4 |
♠62
♥42
♦KQ862
♣T985
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ N +1 ♥8 10-Cowen-Loops vs 9-Winham-Murdock
130 2.50 0.50 2♦ S +2 ♠A 8-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥A 1-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Wainer-Nelson
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥A 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 2-Shvestha-Osborn
|
5 |
♠75
♥AK8765
♦A2
♣973
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 1.50 3N S -2 ♦5 2-Shvestha-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.50 1.50 3N N -2 ♠2 10-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
200 1.50 1.50 3N N -2 ♦6 8-Davidson-Downing vs 7-Modest-Loops
200 1.50 1.50 3N N -2 ♦4 9-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
6 |
♠743
♥K75
♦AT32
♣J93
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♦6 9-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
50 2.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♦4 2-Shvestha-Osborn vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ S -2 ♦4 8-Davidson-Downing vs 7-Modest-Loops
100 0.50 2.50 2♠* S -1 ♦4 10-Cowen-Loops vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
|
7 |
♠T952
♥K986
♦J3
♣J54
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6♥ W -1 ♦3 10-Cowen-Loops vs 2-Shvestha-Osborn
690 1.50 1.50 4N W +2 ♥6 9-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Davidson-Downing
690 1.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♥6 3-Wainer-Nelson vs 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
1460 0.00 3.00 6♠ W +1 ♥6 7-Modest-Loops vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
8 |
♠AT97
♥KT
♦A
♣AQT543
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ -/1♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♥6/7 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 ♣7 7-Modest-Loops vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
150 2.00 1.00 3♣ N +2 ♥6 10-Cowen-Loops vs 2-Shvestha-Osborn
100 1.00 2.00 4♠* E -1 ♣7 9-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Davidson-Downing
530 0.00 3.00 3♠* E ♣6 3-Wainer-Nelson vs 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
|
9 |
♠K4
♥K754
♦J4
♣QJT95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♣Q 1-Nathanson-Stone vs 9-Winham-Murdock
200 2.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♣Q 10-Cowen-Loops vs 3-Wainer-Nelson
120 1.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♠2 8-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
600 0.00 3.00 3N E ♠2 2-Shvestha-Osborn vs 7-Modest-Loops
|
10 |
♠AK
♥98543
♦KT632
♣7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♣Q 8-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥6 2-Shvestha-Osborn vs 7-Modest-Loops
100 0.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 ♣2 10-Cowen-Loops vs 3-Wainer-Nelson
100 0.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♣Q 1-Nathanson-Stone vs 9-Winham-Murdock
|
11 |
♠Q8
♥A94
♦AKT876
♣QJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ N +1 ♥5 2-Shvestha-Osborn vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
130 2.50 0.50 3♦ N +1 ♥5 3-Wainer-Nelson vs 8-Davidson-Downing
50 0.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♥5 10-Cowen-Loops vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.50 2.50 4♦ N -1 ♥5 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 7-Modest-Loops
|
12 |
♠AJT52
♥AQJ92
♦JT
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5/6♥ 6♠ 1NT ♦3 |
EW: 4♦ ♣5 ♥1 ♠1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 0.50 5♠ N ♥6 2-Shvestha-Osborn vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
650 2.50 0.50 5♠ N ♦A 3-Wainer-Nelson vs 8-Davidson-Downing
100 1.00 2.00 5♦* W -1 ♣A 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 7-Modest-Loops
130 0.00 3.00 4♦ W ♣A 10-Cowen-Loops vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠Q98754
♥72
♦Q2
♣J92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 3/1♣ 4/2♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 ♥7 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Winham-Murdock
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ W ♥7 10-Cowen-Loops vs 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
130 0.50 2.50 4♦ W ♠4 3-Wainer-Nelson vs 2-Shvestha-Osborn
130 0.50 2.50 3♦ E +1 ♦3 1-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Modest-Loops
|
14 |
♠9865
♥82
♦KT
♣KJ753
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT1/4 |
EW: 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♣ N -2 ♠A 10-Cowen-Loops vs 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 ♥K 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Winham-Murdock
400 1.00 2.00 3N W ♣5 1-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Modest-Loops
450 0.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♥K 3-Wainer-Nelson vs 2-Shvestha-Osborn
|
15 |
♠AQ87
♥J94
♦AKQ76
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣8 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Wainer-Nelson
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ N +2 ♥T 2-Shvestha-Osborn vs 8-Davidson-Downing
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♥5 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
100 0.00 3.00 1♣* W -1 ♦A 7-Modest-Loops vs 9-Winham-Murdock
|
16 |
♠Q832
♥8
♦K93
♣K9872
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ W +2 ♦3 2-Shvestha-Osborn vs 8-Davidson-Downing
200 2.00 1.00 3♥ W +2 ♣9 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
620 0.50 2.50 4♥ W ♥8 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Wainer-Nelson
620 0.50 2.50 4♥ W ♣9 7-Modest-Loops vs 9-Winham-Murdock
|
17 |
♠A7432
♥J9
♦JT2
♣J65
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♠ N -2 ♥A 8-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
110 1.50 1.50 2♦ E +1 ♠K 3-Wainer-Nelson vs 9-Winham-Murdock
110 1.50 1.50 2♣ W +1 ♥J 10-Cowen-Loops vs 7-Modest-Loops
170 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♠4 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠K75
♥964
♦A872
♣987
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♦5 8-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Nathanson-Stone
120 2.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♦5 3-Wainer-Nelson vs 9-Winham-Murdock
140 0.50 2.50 2♠ W +1 ♣9 10-Cowen-Loops vs 7-Modest-Loops
140 0.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♦5 5-Rodrigues-Avenmarg vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|