| 1 |
♠AQT32
♥KJ943
♦A
♣97
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -2 ♣J 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -2 ♣J 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 5-Murdock-Walker
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -2 ♣J 5-Benich-Benich vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
150 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -3 ♣J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Jones-Henderson
150 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -3 ♣J 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
|
| 2 |
♠AQJ742
♥9
♦K4
♣AQT5
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 4♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 2.50 1.50 6♠ S ♥T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Jones-Henderson
1430 2.50 1.50 6♠ S ♥2 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
1430 2.50 1.50 6♠ N ♥9 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 5-Murdock-Walker
1430 2.50 1.50 6♠ N ♦Q 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
100 0.00 4.00 6N S -1 ♣9 5-Benich-Benich vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
|
| 3 |
♠87532
♥AT752
♦J5
♣6
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♥ ♦1 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠A 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
200 3.00 1.00 4♠* W -1 ♣6 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 5-Murdock-Walker
50 1.00 3.00 5♥ N -1 ♠A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Jones-Henderson
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♦3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
50 1.00 3.00 4♣ S -1 ♥3 5-Benich-Benich vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
|
| 4 |
♠T93
♥A
♦QT843
♣A932
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 6♦ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♥5 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ N +2 ♥K 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♥4 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 5-Murdock-Walker
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ N +1 ♥K 5-Benich-Benich vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
100 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -1 ♥4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Jones-Henderson
|
| 5 |
♠T975
♥42
♦AKJ6
♣QT9
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ N +2 ♦Q 5-Benich-Benich vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥6 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
100 2.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♠3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
100 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♠3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Jones-Henderson
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♥6 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 5-Murdock-Walker
|
| 6 |
♠QJ642
♥Q754
♦T92
♣T
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♦1/2 NT1 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ S -2 ♣6 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
150 3.00 1.00 4♣ E +1 ♠K 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
170 1.00 3.00 4♣ E +2 ♠5 5-Benich-Benich vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
170 1.00 3.00 4♣ E +2 ♣3 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 1-Jones-Henderson
170 1.00 3.00 3♣ E +3 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Murdock-Walker
|
| 7 |
♠T2
♥AQ5
♦A2
♣KT9642
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦4 |
| EW: 3♦ ♣6/5 ♥2/1 ♠4/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♠6 5-Benich-Benich vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♦T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Murdock-Walker
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♦T 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♦T 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 1-Jones-Henderson
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +1 ♦T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
|
| 8 |
♠832
♥KQ842
♦4
♣J765
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣5/6 ♦5 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 3/2♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♥2 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♥T 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 1-Jones-Henderson
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♥T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E ♥T 5-Benich-Benich vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 ♦8 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Murdock-Walker
|
| 9 |
♠T9854
♥972
♦Q3
♣T86
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3/2 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ E ♥A 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 1-Jones-Henderson
600 2.50 1.50 3N E ♥3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
600 2.50 1.50 3N E ♣4 5-Benich-Benich vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
630 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♥K 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
630 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♦5 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Murdock-Walker
|
| 10 |
♠Q976
♥6
♦653
♣T9652
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 2/1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠3 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 1-Jones-Henderson
400 3.00 1.00 2♥ S -4 ♣A 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
600 1.50 2.50 3N E ♠3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
600 1.50 2.50 3N E ♥4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Murdock-Walker
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠3 5-Benich-Benich vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
|
| 11 |
♠J6
♥87
♦K6
♣AKQJ753
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣1 ♦4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N S ♥2 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
400 3.50 0.50 3N S ♥2 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 5-Murdock-Walker
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -4 ♦K 5-Benich-Benich vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ N +2 ♦J 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
130 0.00 4.00 2♣ N +2 ♠2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Jones-Henderson
|
| 12 |
♠A6
♥AT9
♦A8753
♣Q98
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6/5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N N ♥K 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 5-Murdock-Walker
50 3.00 1.00 1N E -1 ♦6 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ E ♦T 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ E ♠2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Jones-Henderson
110 0.50 3.50 1♥ E +1 ♦2 5-Benich-Benich vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
|
| 13 |
♠AQJ9
♥KQ
♦95
♣AK952
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1/2NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N N ♣Q 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 5-Murdock-Walker
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ N ♠4 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Jones-Henderson
100 2.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♠4 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
200 1.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♣Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
400 0.00 4.00 3N S -4 ♠3 5-Benich-Benich vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
|
| 14 |
♠Q64
♥63
♦A4
♣Q97654
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♦ ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 5♥ 5♠ ♣1 ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♦ S -1 ♣8 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♦A 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 5-Murdock-Walker
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♦A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Jones-Henderson
450 1.00 3.00 5♠ W ♦A 5-Benich-Benich vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
500 0.00 4.00 5♦* S -3 ♠A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
|
| 15 |
♠AJ
♥QJ852
♦T876
♣98
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 4.00 0.00 4♥* N ♣A 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 5-Murdock-Walker
100 3.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♠9 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
50 2.00 2.00 5♣ W -1 ♠A 5-Benich-Benich vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
130 1.00 3.00 4♣ W ♠A 2-Grant-Nelson vs 1-Jones-Henderson
400 0.00 4.00 3N E ♥9 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
|
| 16 |
♠Q5
♥T843
♦654
♣K943
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♥3 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ E ♦A 5-Benich-Benich vs 1-Jones-Henderson
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 ♦K 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Murdock-Walker
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ E +1 ♦A 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ E +2 ♦A 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
|
| 17 |
♠K7
♥JT93
♦K76
♣QJ63
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N W ♣3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
130 3.00 1.00 1♦ W +3 ♥J 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Murdock-Walker
150 2.00 2.00 2N W +1 ♥J 5-Benich-Benich vs 1-Jones-Henderson
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ W +1 ♥J 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ W +1 ♣Q 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
|
| 18 |
♠AK9
♥QT9
♦T93
♣AK42
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 4/5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 6N S -1 ♦Q 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
100 3.00 1.00 6N S -1 ♦8 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
100 3.00 1.00 6N N -1 ♠4 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Murdock-Walker
200 1.00 3.00 6N S -2 ♦Q 5-Benich-Benich vs 1-Jones-Henderson
400 0.00 4.00 7N S -4 ♦7 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
|
| 19 |
♠9852
♥-
♦A832
♣K9654
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♠ ♦5 ♥4/3 NT6 |
| EW: 1/2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣2 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥J 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♣Q 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥J 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Murdock-Walker
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥J 5-Benich-Benich vs 1-Jones-Henderson
50 0.00 4.00 5♣ S -1 ♦K 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
|
| 20 |
♠KQ832
♥KT6
♦J4
♣T85
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣5/4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♦2 5-Benich-Benich vs 1-Jones-Henderson
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♦6 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
180 1.50 2.50 2N S +2 ♦2 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
180 1.50 2.50 1N S +3 ♦2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 5-Murdock-Walker
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♣4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
|
| 21 |
♠AQ6
♥KQJ
♦542
♣K865
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♦3 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 1-Jones-Henderson
120 3.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♦3 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
100 1.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♦3 5-Benich-Benich vs 5-Murdock-Walker
100 1.00 3.00 1N N -1 ♥4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
100 1.00 3.00 1N N -1 ♥4 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
|
| 22 |
♠32
♥AQJ95
♦K852
♣42
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥5 ♠1/2 NT1 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♣ E -1 ♥2 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
190 3.00 1.00 3♣ E +4 ♦9 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 1-Jones-Henderson
210 2.00 2.00 2N W +3 ♥9 5-Benich-Benich vs 5-Murdock-Walker
600 1.00 3.00 3N W ♥Q 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
|
| 23 |
♠J
♥A742
♦J65
♣KQJ32
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2/3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♦3 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 1-Jones-Henderson
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♥3 5-Benich-Benich vs 5-Murdock-Walker
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♦3 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♦3 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♦3 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
|
| 24 |
♠5
♥AT973
♦T9832
♣64
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♠ 3/1NT ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♦4 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
100 3.50 0.50 4♣ W -2 ♦T 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
130 1.50 2.50 3♣ W +1 ♦T 5-Benich-Benich vs 5-Murdock-Walker
130 1.50 2.50 2♣ W +2 ♦T 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
400 0.00 4.00 3N E ♠K 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 1-Jones-Henderson
|
| 25 |
♠QJ32
♥643
♦K853
♣72
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 2N E -4 ♠4 3-Smith-Millslagle vs 1-Jones-Henderson
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♠8 4-Wasserstrom-Hasey vs 3-McCabe-Nelson
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♠2 2-Grant-Nelson vs 4-Oppenheimer-Smith
100 1.00 3.00 2♦ S -2 ♣6 5-Benich-Benich vs 5-Murdock-Walker
210 0.00 4.00 1N W +4 ♠2 1-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Suddards-Avenmarg
|