1 |
♠A853
♥KQ6543
♦JT
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S ♦3 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 4-Harken-Harken
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♣6 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♦8 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♦3 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Gunter-Albright
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -3 ♠6 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Zinman-Karter
|
2 |
♠Q92
♥K7543
♦KT53
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♥9 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 4-Harken-Harken
400 3.00 1.00 3N E ♦8 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
430 2.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♦8 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Gunter-Albright
520 1.00 3.00 3N E +4 ♦8 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
990 0.00 4.00 6N E ♠A 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Zinman-Karter
|
3 |
♠A7632
♥Q32
♦AQ5
♣62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♦6/7 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♣6 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Zinman-Karter
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♣6 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Gunter-Albright
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♣6 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -1 ♣6 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 4-Harken-Harken
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W ♣6 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
|
4 |
♠K9743
♥J87
♦5
♣JT52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♦5 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♦5 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♦5 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 4-Harken-Harken
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♦5 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Zinman-Karter
690 0.00 4.00 3N E +3 ♦8 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Gunter-Albright
|
5 |
♠Q7654
♥A875
♦AK
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3/4 ♥1 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ E ♠9 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 4-Harken-Harken
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♠2 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♠2 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 5-Gunter-Albright
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♠2 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
1090 0.00 4.00 6♣* W ♦K 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 1-Zinman-Karter
|
6 |
♠QT32
♥Q4
♦AT9743
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 6♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♦* S -1 ♣A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ W ♠2 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Gunter-Albright
620 2.00 2.00 5♣ W +1 ♦A 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Harken
680 0.50 3.50 4♥ W +2 ♦3 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Zinman-Karter
680 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +2 ♦K 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
|
7 |
♠KQ6
♥AK
♦742
♣QT743
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠T 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Gunter-Albright
600 2.50 1.50 3N N ♠T 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Harken
600 2.50 1.50 3N N ♠T 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Zinman-Karter
200 1.00 3.00 4♠* E -1 ♦A 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♠4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
8 |
♠A9
♥T
♦Q763
♣AKJ875
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2/1♠ 2NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3/4 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ N ♥A 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -2 ♣T 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Zinman-Karter
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -2 ♣T 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
100 0.50 3.50 5♣ N -2 ♦4 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 0.50 3.50 4♣ N -2 ♥A 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Gunter-Albright
|
9 |
♠KJ74
♥AQ852
♦J
♣865
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥1 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠J 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠8 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Gunter-Albright
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♣A 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Zinman-Karter
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♣A 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♣A 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
10 |
♠T86
♥K4
♦K65
♣AKJ93
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♣4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 2.50 1.50 2N N +1 ♥Q 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 5-Gunter-Albright
150 2.50 1.50 1N N +2 ♥9 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
120 1.00 3.00 1N N +1 ♥Q 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ W -1 ♣A 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Zinman-Karter
|
11 |
♠4
♥K975
♦AKJ4
♣QT64
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ 2/3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦7/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -4 ♠4 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
150 2.50 1.50 2N N +1 ♥3 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Harken-Harken
150 2.50 1.50 3♦ E -3 ♠4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Zinman-Karter
120 1.00 3.00 1N N +1 ♥3 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Gunter-Albright
50 0.00 4.00 2♣ W -1 ♠4 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
12 |
♠K963
♥92
♦754
♣JT42
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/4 ♦2/3 ♥1 ♠2 NT2/3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 6♥ 4/5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ W +1 ♣J 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Zinman-Karter
460 1.50 2.50 5N W ♠3 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Harken-Harken
460 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♠3 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Gunter-Albright
460 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♠3 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
460 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♣2 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
|
13 |
♠T94
♥AKQT43
♦Q74
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ N +1 ♠Q 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Harken-Harken
170 3.50 0.50 3♥ N +1 ♣A 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ N ♠2 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ N ♥J 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Zinman-Karter
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 ♣3 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Gunter-Albright
|
14 |
♠J972
♥T842
♦JT
♣QT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦J 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Gunter-Albright
210 3.00 1.00 2N W +3 ♠J 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Harken-Harken
400 2.00 2.00 3N W ♥2 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
460 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♠2 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Zinman-Karter
460 0.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠4 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
15 |
♠K63
♥32
♦K96
♣QJ764
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♠ E ♦A 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ E ♦Q 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 4-Harken-Harken
170 1.38 2.63 2♠ E +2 ♣9 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Gunter-Albright
200 0.13 3.88 3♠ E +2 ♥6 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 1-Zinman-Karter
|
16 |
♠A32
♥J765
♦98
♣Q652
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S ♦J 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Gunter-Albright
90 3.00 1.00 1N E ♥4 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Harken
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♥5 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ W +2 ♣2 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ W +2 ♣2 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 1-Zinman-Karter
|
17 |
♠A94
♥T3
♦7
♣QJ87632
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -6 ♣T 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 2.50 1.50 2N W +1 ♣Q 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Harken
150 2.50 1.50 3♦ E +2 ♣Q 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Gunter-Albright
400 1.00 3.00 3N W ♣7 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 1-Zinman-Karter
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♣8 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
|
18 |
♠75
♥K8632
♦A97
♣J94
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ W ♥3 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ W +2 ♥3 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ W +2 ♥3 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 1-Zinman-Karter
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +2 ♥3 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Harken
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♥2 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Gunter-Albright
|
19 |
♠KJT75
♥Q865
♦74
♣Q2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4/3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -1 ♥9 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ E ♦K 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♦3 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Gunter-Albright
150 1.00 3.00 1N E +2 ♣6 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 1-Zinman-Karter
180 0.00 4.00 1N E +3 ♦K 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
20 |
♠AK53
♥7642
♦-
♣QT432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 2N W -2 ♣3 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 1-Zinman-Karter
200 3.50 0.50 1N W -2 ♣3 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
90 1.50 2.50 1N W ♣3 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 5-Gunter-Albright
90 1.50 2.50 1N W ♣3 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 4.00 1N S -2 ♠9 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
21 |
♠K
♥975
♦KQ92
♣Q9543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 ♠9 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♥A 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 5-Gunter-Albright
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣8 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Zinman-Karter
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♠9 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♠9 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
22 |
♠AQ53
♥T942
♦98
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 1.00 5♠ N +1 ♠4 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Zinman-Karter
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♦Q 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
480 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♦4 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Harken-Harken
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +1 ♥5 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ N +1 ♥A 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 5-Gunter-Albright
|
23 |
♠8
♥962
♦J9852
♣KJ54
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6/5 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2/1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♠8 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Zinman-Karter
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ W ♠8 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♠8 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Harken-Harken
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♠A 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 5-Gunter-Albright
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♦7 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
|
24 |
♠J632
♥KQ96
♦QT
♣J84
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4NT ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 1.00 4♣ W ♦Q 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 5-Gunter-Albright
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ W +1 ♦Q 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Harken-Harken
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ E +1 ♠K 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
180 1.00 3.00 1N E +3 ♦7 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♦Q 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Zinman-Karter
|
25 |
♠A3
♥K872
♦K82
♣Q985
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♠K 5-Wesolowski-Burke vs 5-Gunter-Albright
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♣5 1-Schamberg-Dilfer vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +3 ♥2 3-Johnson-Osborn vs 1-Zinman-Karter
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♥3 2-Avenmarg-Chase vs 4-Harken-Harken
620 0.50 3.50 4♠ W ♥2 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Cowen-Reiss
|