1 |
♠T9832
♥42
♦872
♣A76
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 6♥* E -2 ♥A 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 1.00 5♥ E -1 ♠J 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Winham-Nelson
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♦Q 1-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Thomas-Payne
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♦5 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
2 |
♠AQ
♥AT64
♦AKT94
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠3 |
EW: 1♣ 3/4♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N N +3 ♥Q 1-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Thomas-Payne
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ S -1 ♣A 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ W ♥4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Winham-Nelson
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ W ♦A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Loops-Loops
590 0.00 4.00 4♠* W ♦A 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
|
3 |
♠AK54
♥9865
♦J5
♣T87
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3/2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 ♣4 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Loops-Loops
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦K 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 ♥A 1-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Thomas-Payne
110 0.50 3.50 2♦ E +1 ♠2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Winham-Nelson
110 0.50 3.50 2♦ E +1 ♣K 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
|
4 |
♠QT3
♥QJ72
♦KQ8
♣T98
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 5/6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♥4 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♦A 1-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Thomas-Payne
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Winham-Nelson
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ N ♦3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Loops-Loops
230 0.00 4.00 2♠ S +4 ♦A 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
|
5 |
♠A7
♥AKQ6
♦AK75
♣T85
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
690 3.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♠6 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Thomas-Payne
690 3.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♠6 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
660 1.00 3.00 3N N +2 ♠6 1-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Winham-Nelson
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ N +1 ♦J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Allen-Kerner
|
6 |
♠Q4
♥JT4
♦KJ942
♣Q43
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♥J 1-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Winham-Nelson
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♥J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♥2 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Thomas-Payne
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♦4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Allen-Kerner
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♥J 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
|
7 |
♠87432
♥J63
♦AT3
♣62
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4/3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 6♠* W -2 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.00 1.00 5♠ W -2 ♣6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Allen-Kerner
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣6 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Thomas-Payne
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥3 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♦A 1-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Winham-Nelson
|
8 |
♠K642
♥A72
♦QT
♣JT93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♥5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Allen-Kerner
90 2.50 1.50 1N S ♥5 5-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Thomas-Payne
90 2.50 1.50 1N S ♥5 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
PASS 0.50 3.50 Pass Out 1-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Winham-Nelson
PASS 0.50 3.50 Pass Out 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
9 |
♠Q982
♥K87
♦986
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 6♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N W +1 ♣7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Winham-Nelson
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♠2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Thomas-Payne
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣Q 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Loops-Loops
630 1.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♦6 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Allen-Kerner
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♣Q 1-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
10 |
♠AJT43
♥A983
♦2
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ N +2 ♣K 1-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♦J 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Winham-Nelson
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♣K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Thomas-Payne
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♣K 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Loops-Loops
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ N +1 ♦J 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Allen-Kerner
|
11 |
♠6
♥AT9876
♦AK9
♣K95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 4.00 0.00 6♥ N ♥2 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Winham-Nelson
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +2 ♠8 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Thomas-Payne
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +2 ♠2 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Allen-Kerner
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +2 ♦8 1-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +2 ♦4 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
12 |
♠A
♥J98742
♦J873
♣63
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♦2 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Allen-Kerner
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♥7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Thomas-Payne
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ W +1 ♠A 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Loops-Loops
430 1.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥9 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Winham-Nelson
490 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♥7 1-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠K3
♥QJT962
♦KJT4
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Winham-Nelson
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦7 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Allen-Kerner
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣T 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Thomas-Payne
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♥8 1-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
14 |
♠T6
♥K3
♦JT875
♣AKJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5/6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 4.00 0.00 3N E -5 ♦4 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Allen-Kerner
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ N +1 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
50 1.50 2.50 3♣ E -1 ♠K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Winham-Nelson
50 1.50 2.50 3♣ E -1 ♦4 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Thomas-Payne
100 0.00 4.00 4♦ N -2 ♠5 1-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
15 |
♠932
♥KQ52
♦743
♣QT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♣ W -2 ♦7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Winham-Nelson
100 3.50 0.50 3♣ W -2 ♦3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
50 1.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 ♥K 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Thomas-Payne
50 1.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 ♦7 1-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Loops-Loops
50 1.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 ♦3 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Allen-Kerner
|
16 |
♠Q74
♥J65
♦A975
♣652
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 1.00 3N S ♥7 1-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Loops-Loops
400 3.00 1.00 3N S ♣3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
400 3.00 1.00 3N N ♦6 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Thomas-Payne
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♣3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Winham-Nelson
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♣3 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Allen-Kerner
|
17 |
♠A76542
♥2
♦KJ6
♣J92
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥6 1-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Allen-Kerner
50 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Loops-Loops
120 2.00 2.00 2N E ♠9 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Thomas-Payne
430 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♥6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
460 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♠9 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠J863
♥KT62
♦2
♣JT65
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +3 ♦J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Loops-Loops
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♦A 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Thomas-Payne
120 2.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♦4 1-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Allen-Kerner
50 1.00 3.00 2N E -1 ♠2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.00 4.00 2N S -2 ♦3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠Q96543
♥A654
♦-
♣KT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♦Q 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Thomas-Payne
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Loops-Loops
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♦Q 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ E ♠8 1-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Allen-Kerner
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ E ♥K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
|
20 |
♠QT864
♥J9
♦Q9
♣Q873
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ W +2 ♦Q 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Thomas-Payne
600 3.00 1.00 3N W ♦Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠5 1-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Allen-Kerner
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Loops-Loops
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♦7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
21 |
♠876
♥J764
♦KJ6
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5/4 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 0.50 3N S ♣7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Allen-Kerner
600 3.50 0.50 3N S ♣7 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 6-Winham-Nelson
50 2.00 2.00 2♣ W -1 ♥4 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♣7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♣7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
22 |
♠KQ92
♥AQ9542
♦T
♣73
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♣ 2/3♦ -/1♥ 1/2♠ 2NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥5 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ E ♥7 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 6-Winham-Nelson
150 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -3 ♦7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
600 0.50 3.50 3N W ♥5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Loops-Loops
600 0.50 3.50 3N W ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Allen-Kerner
|
23 |
♠T9742
♥6
♦72
♣A9853
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣4 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ E ♠A 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 6-Winham-Nelson
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ E ♥3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Allen-Kerner
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♥7 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♣4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Loops-Loops
|
24 |
♠QT632
♥J4
♦T76
♣A87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 2.00 5♥ W ♦T 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Stolzberg-Riley
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Loops-Loops
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠3 3-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Allen-Kerner
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠3 6-Suddards-Davidson vs 6-Winham-Nelson
|