1 |
♠984
♥A5
♦QJ95
♣AJ94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♣ N ♠9 9-Burtch-Benich vs 7-Bell-Hayes
170 3.50 1.50 3♠ W +1 ♠9 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
170 3.50 1.50 2♠ W +2 ♥A 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 1-Johnson-Keen
200 1.00 4.00 3♠ W +2 ♥A 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 11-Harken-Oing
200 1.00 4.00 3♠ W +2 ♥A 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Harken-Walker
200 1.00 4.00 3♠ W +2 ♥A 8-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Franich-Burk
|
2 |
♠876
♥KQ
♦A765
♣J654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 6♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♣K 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Harken-Walker
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♣3 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 11-Harken-Oing
200 4.00 1.00 2♥ E +3 ♣3 9-Burtch-Benich vs 7-Bell-Hayes
450 1.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♣K 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
450 1.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♣K 8-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Franich-Burk
480 0.00 5.00 4♥ E +2 ♣K 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
3 |
♠543
♥Q986
♦9543
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5/4 ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♣A 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
170 4.00 1.00 1♠ S +3 ♥A 8-Burke-Reuben vs 4-Franich-Burk
170 4.00 1.00 1♠ S +3 ♣A 9-Burtch-Benich vs 7-Bell-Hayes
100 2.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 ♠5 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Harken-Walker
50 1.00 4.00 3♥ S -1 ♦2 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 11-Harken-Oing
150 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -3 ♦Q 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
4 |
♠AKQ8
♥AKT
♦J43
♣Q86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1370 5.00 0.00 6♣ N ♦6 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Burke-Reuben
720 4.00 1.00 3N N +4 ♠2 7-Bell-Hayes vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
710 3.00 2.00 4♥ S +3 ♠3 9-Burtch-Benich vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
680 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +2 ♦A 11-Harken-Oing vs 4-Franich-Burk
640 1.00 4.00 5♣ N +2 ♥3 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 2-Harken-Walker
600 0.00 5.00 3N N ♦5 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
5 |
♠T54
♥K95
♦Q873
♣J53
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 3/2♦ 6♥ 1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♥ W +1 ♦J 11-Harken-Oing vs 4-Franich-Burk
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♠7 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Burke-Reuben
480 3.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♦J 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
510 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +3 ♠7 7-Bell-Hayes vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
510 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +3 ♠7 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 2-Harken-Walker
510 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +3 ♠4 9-Burtch-Benich vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
6 |
♠A842
♥J2
♦Q653
♣732
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 4♦ 6♥ 5/4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.50 0.50 5♥ W +1 ♦3 11-Harken-Oing vs 4-Franich-Burk
680 4.50 0.50 5♥ E +1 ♠A 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 2-Harken-Walker
1430 2.00 3.00 6♥ W ♠A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 8-Burke-Reuben
1430 2.00 3.00 6♥ W ♠A 7-Bell-Hayes vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
1430 2.00 3.00 6♥ W ♦3 9-Burtch-Benich vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
1440 0.00 5.00 6N E ♠5 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
7 |
♠7543
♥J73
♦Q
♣JT985
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 1NT ♣4/3 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥4 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Burke-Reuben
90 3.50 1.50 1N S ♠2 11-Harken-Oing vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
90 3.50 1.50 1N S ♠2 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
100 2.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 ♥8 7-Bell-Hayes vs 4-Franich-Burk
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ E ♣2 2-Harken-Walker vs 9-Burtch-Benich
200 0.00 5.00 2N S -2 ♦2 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
|
8 |
♠7
♥AKJ732
♦85
♣AQ86
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♠ ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 5.00 0.00 4♥* N ♠A 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
50 3.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥Q 7-Bell-Hayes vs 4-Franich-Burk
50 3.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥4 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
50 1.50 3.50 5♥ N -1 ♠A 2-Harken-Walker vs 9-Burtch-Benich
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♠A 11-Harken-Oing vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ E ♥4 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Burke-Reuben
|
9 |
♠T
♥KJ865
♦AQ3
♣K743
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/3♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 5.00 0.00 4♣* W -3 ♠T 1-Johnson-Keen vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
170 4.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 ♣8 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 8-Burke-Reuben
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ N +1 ♣8 7-Bell-Hayes vs 4-Franich-Burk
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ N +1 ♣8 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ N ♣8 11-Harken-Oing vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
100 0.00 5.00 3♠ S -2 ♣A 2-Harken-Walker vs 9-Burtch-Benich
|
10 |
♠JT5
♥QJ52
♦AQT8
♣JT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 5.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♥3 2-Harken-Walker vs 7-Bell-Hayes
630 3.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♥4 11-Harken-Oing vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
630 3.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♦5 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 4-Franich-Burk
630 3.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♣3 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 1-Johnson-Keen
100 1.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♣A 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Burtch-Benich
300 0.00 5.00 3N S -3 ♠8 8-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
11 |
♠K62
♥Q8652
♦A2
♣QJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.50 0.50 2♠ W -3 ♥2 2-Harken-Walker vs 7-Bell-Hayes
150 4.50 0.50 3♦ E -3 ♥9 11-Harken-Oing vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
120 3.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♠4 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Burtch-Benich
50 2.00 3.00 2N W -1 ♥5 8-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
50 1.00 4.00 2♦ S -1 ♥A 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 4-Franich-Burk
100 0.00 5.00 2♥ N -2 ♠8 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
12 |
♠A9864
♥T874
♦A
♣JT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 5.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♠2 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 1-Johnson-Keen
650 4.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥5 2-Harken-Walker vs 7-Bell-Hayes
200 3.00 2.00 2♠ N +3 ♦K 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 9-Burtch-Benich
170 1.50 3.50 3♠ S +1 ♣7 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 4-Franich-Burk
170 1.50 3.50 2♥ N +2 ♦K 8-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
100 0.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♦T 11-Harken-Oing vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
|
13 |
♠QJ8532
♥Q953
♦76
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 6♣ W -1 ♠5 4-Franich-Burk vs 2-Harken-Walker
150 4.00 1.00 4♣ W +1 ♠Q 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
600 2.00 3.00 5♣ W ♠Q 9-Burtch-Benich vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
600 2.00 3.00 5♣ W ♠8 7-Bell-Hayes vs 11-Harken-Oing
600 2.00 3.00 5♣ W ♦7 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
620 0.00 5.00 5♣ W +1 ♥3 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 8-Burke-Reuben
|
14 |
♠4
♥Q9872
♦32
♣KT986
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 5/4♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦9 7-Bell-Hayes vs 11-Harken-Oing
50 4.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦9 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
50 2.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♦A 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 8-Burke-Reuben
50 2.50 2.50 4♥ N -1 ♦K 4-Franich-Burk vs 2-Harken-Walker
100 1.00 4.00 5♥* N -1 ♦A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
300 0.00 5.00 5♥* N -2 ♦Q 9-Burtch-Benich vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
|
15 |
♠K764
♥KQ9
♦A63
♣Q86
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1/2 ♦1 ♥6 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥5 9-Burtch-Benich vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
50 4.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥5 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
130 3.00 2.00 3♣ E +1 ♠8 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 8-Burke-Reuben
150 2.00 3.00 3♣ E +2 ♥8 7-Bell-Hayes vs 11-Harken-Oing
400 1.00 4.00 3N E ♥5 4-Franich-Burk vs 2-Harken-Walker
430 0.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♥5 1-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
|
16 |
♠Q753
♥KT93
♦T763
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 ♥7 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Bell-Hayes
200 4.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 ♥7 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
150 3.00 2.00 2N W +1 ♥3 2-Harken-Walker vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
200 1.50 3.50 2N S -4 ♦J 4-Franich-Burk vs 9-Burtch-Benich
200 1.50 3.50 2♥ E +3 ♣4 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
250 0.00 5.00 2♣ S -5 ♦9 8-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Harken-Oing
|
17 |
♠6543
♥AK63
♦JT8
♣62
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1/-♠ ♣6 ♥6/5 ♠7/6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♠5 2-Harken-Walker vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
90 4.00 1.00 1N S ♠8 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
50 2.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♠J 8-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Harken-Oing
50 2.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 ♠2 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Bell-Hayes
50 2.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 ♣9 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
120 0.00 5.00 2N W ♥A 4-Franich-Burk vs 9-Burtch-Benich
|
18 |
♠QT63
♥A8
♦QT73
♣852
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦A 2-Harken-Walker vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦K 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦A 1-Johnson-Keen vs 7-Bell-Hayes
100 1.50 3.50 3♠ S -1 ♦A 4-Franich-Burk vs 9-Burtch-Benich
100 1.50 3.50 3♠ S -1 ♦A 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
140 0.00 5.00 3♥ W ♠3 8-Burke-Reuben vs 11-Harken-Oing
|
19 |
♠AT7653
♥J7
♦62
♣A64
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♥ 2♠ 1/-NT ♦6 ♥7/6 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 1.00 2♠ N ♦A 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 7-Bell-Hayes
110 4.00 1.00 2♠ N ♦3 2-Harken-Walker vs 8-Burke-Reuben
110 4.00 1.00 2♠ N ♦3 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Keen
50 1.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♦A 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 4-Franich-Burk
50 1.50 3.50 2♠ N -1 ♥9 11-Harken-Oing vs 9-Burtch-Benich
100 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -2 ♥8 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
20 |
♠T9765
♥A6
♦Q973
♣98
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♠ 2/1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣T 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 4-Franich-Burk
170 3.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♣2 11-Harken-Oing vs 9-Burtch-Benich
170 3.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 ♣J 2-Harken-Walker vs 8-Burke-Reuben
170 3.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 ♣J 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Keen
140 0.50 4.50 2♠ S +1 ♣J 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
140 0.50 4.50 1♠ N +2 ♥4 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 7-Bell-Hayes
|
21 |
♠J9
♥AJT854
♦3
♣7643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 1.00 3♥ N ♣K 2-Harken-Walker vs 8-Burke-Reuben
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♣K 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 4-Franich-Burk
140 4.00 1.00 1♥ N +2 ♣K 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Keen
100 2.00 3.00 3♠ W -2 ♦3 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
100 0.50 4.50 4♥ N -1 ♦6 11-Harken-Oing vs 9-Burtch-Benich
100 0.50 4.50 2♥ N -1 ♣K 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 7-Bell-Hayes
|
22 |
♠JT4
♥432
♦75
♣QJ985
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥3 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣8 7-Bell-Hayes vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
90 4.00 1.00 1N W ♣5 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 9-Burtch-Benich
170 2.00 3.00 3♦ W +3 ♣A 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 2-Harken-Walker
170 2.00 3.00 3♦ E +3 ♣A 11-Harken-Oing vs 1-Johnson-Keen
170 2.00 3.00 3♦ E +3 ♣K 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 8-Burke-Reuben
210 0.00 5.00 1N W +4 ♣Q 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Franich-Burk
|
23 |
♠AT832
♥Q93
♦AQ62
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 1.00 4♣ W +1 ♠A 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 8-Burke-Reuben
150 4.00 1.00 3♣ E +2 ♠4 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Franich-Burk
150 4.00 1.00 2♣ W +3 ♥3 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 9-Burtch-Benich
600 1.00 4.00 5♣ W ♠A 11-Harken-Oing vs 1-Johnson-Keen
600 1.00 4.00 5♣ E ♠Q 7-Bell-Hayes vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
600 1.00 4.00 5♣ E ♣7 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 2-Harken-Walker
|
24 |
♠J4
♥JT4
♦KT52
♣K843
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 6♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 2.00 5♠ E ♦4 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr vs 2-Harken-Walker
450 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♥9 10-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Franich-Burk
450 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♥6 3-Dotters-Dotters vs 9-Burtch-Benich
450 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♦9 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 8-Burke-Reuben
450 3.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♣3 7-Bell-Hayes vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
480 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +2 ♣A 11-Harken-Oing vs 1-Johnson-Keen
|
25 |
♠KJ632
♥A54
♦KT8
♣94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 5.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠7 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
130 3.50 1.50 2♦ S +2 ♥6 8-Burke-Reuben vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
130 3.50 1.50 2♦ S +2 ♣6 4-Franich-Burk vs 1-Johnson-Keen
110 2.00 3.00 3♦ N ♦2 2-Harken-Walker vs 11-Harken-Oing
PASS 1.00 4.00 Pass Out 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 9-Burtch-Benich
100 0.00 5.00 3N N -2 ♣3 7-Bell-Hayes vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
|
26 |
♠Q98762
♥J87
♦4
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♠9 4-Franich-Burk vs 1-Johnson-Keen
200 4.00 1.00 1N W -2 ♠6 2-Harken-Walker vs 11-Harken-Oing
110 2.50 2.50 3♦ W ♠6 7-Bell-Hayes vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
110 2.50 2.50 3♦ E ♠T 8-Burke-Reuben vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
200 1.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♥4 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
300 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -3 ♦Q 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 9-Burtch-Benich
|
27 |
♠943
♥AK852
♦98
♣Q63
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣7 2-Harken-Walker vs 11-Harken-Oing
420 4.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣2 12-Shipman Jr-Reiss vs 9-Burtch-Benich
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣7 4-Franich-Burk vs 1-Johnson-Keen
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣7 7-Bell-Hayes vs 3-Dotters-Dotters
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣7 8-Burke-Reuben vs 6-Faircrest-Turano Jr
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♣7 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 10-Wesolowski-Henderson
|