1 |
♠K95
♥K43
♦KJ9
♣AK95
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ N ♥Q 5-Harken-Winham vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♥Q 2-Kremers-Duey vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♦Q 1-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Roy-Nelson
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -1 ♥Q 3-Allen-Kerner vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠KJ92
♥J65
♦AJ6
♣K92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 3NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: -/2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6/8 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2N W -2 ♠2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 3.50 0.50 2♣ W -2 ♥5 1-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Roy-Nelson
50 1.50 2.50 1♣ W -1 ♠2 2-Kremers-Duey vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
50 1.50 2.50 1♣ W -1 ♠2 3-Allen-Kerner vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♣4 5-Harken-Winham vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
|
3 |
♠T854
♥AJT62
♦Q8
♣83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2/3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT2/3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♦6 3-Allen-Kerner vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ E ♥K 1-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Roy-Nelson
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ E +1 ♥K 5-Harken-Winham vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
170 1.00 3.00 2♣ E +4 ♦T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♥6 2-Kremers-Duey vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
|
4 |
♠54
♥K9543
♦QJT73
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 5NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦9 1-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Roy-Nelson
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♠2 3-Allen-Kerner vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♠2 5-Harken-Winham vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ S +1 ♣3 2-Kremers-Duey vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
|
5 |
♠K8
♥AT8
♦AK6
♣AQ976
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 2N N -1 ♦3 3-Allen-Kerner vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦Q 1-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♣4 5-Harken-Winham vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -2 ♥5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Roy-Nelson
500 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -5 ♥5 2-Kremers-Duey vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
|
6 |
♠QT743
♥83
♦7
♣T7652
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦0/1 ♥1 ♠4/5 NT2 |
EW: 3/4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
270 4.00 0.00 2N W +5 ♠4 3-Allen-Kerner vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
660 2.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Roy-Nelson
660 2.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♣5 5-Harken-Winham vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
690 0.50 3.50 3N W +3 ♠4 1-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
690 0.50 3.50 3N W +3 ♠4 2-Kremers-Duey vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
|
7 |
♠J
♥KJ82
♦AJ8763
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♣4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Roy-Nelson
100 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♦A 1-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 3♦ N -1 ♣J 2-Kremers-Duey vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 1.50 2.50 5♣ N -1 ♥3 5-Harken-Winham vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ W ♠J 3-Allen-Kerner vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
|
8 |
♠94
♥KJ75
♦AK53
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 ♠7 5-Harken-Winham vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
130 3.00 1.00 2♦ N +2 ♣A 2-Kremers-Duey vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠7 1-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Roy-Nelson
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♣6 3-Allen-Kerner vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
|
9 |
♠QT7653
♥K2
♦95
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ -/1♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♦7 1-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♥J 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -2 ♥J 3-Allen-Kerner vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
150 0.00 4.00 2N W +1 ♠6 2-Kremers-Duey vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
10 |
♠54
♥Q9
♦AJ3
♣AT9765
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4/3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 1N E -1 ♥A 2-Kremers-Duey vs 1-Roy-Nelson
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♥T 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ S ♠6 1-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ N ♥J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -2 ♠A 3-Allen-Kerner vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
|
11 |
♠KQ
♥K2
♦AJ954
♣T743
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦2 3-Allen-Kerner vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♠9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♦2 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
400 1.00 3.00 3N S ♦2 2-Kremers-Duey vs 1-Roy-Nelson
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ S ♣5 1-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
|
12 |
♠A52
♥A742
♦Q63
♣T86
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♥J 2-Kremers-Duey vs 1-Roy-Nelson
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S ♦2 3-Allen-Kerner vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♥J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♣A 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ S ♥6 1-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
|
13 |
♠KJ987
♥985
♦A9642
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ -/1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♥6/7 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♣A 3-Allen-Kerner vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 3.00 1.00 4♣ W -1 ♠7 1-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ E ♥3 2-Kremers-Duey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -2 ♣A 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Roy-Nelson
200 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -2 ♣6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
|
14 |
♠Q765
♥K93
♦T932
♣J4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 5/6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 4♣ E +2 ♦4 3-Allen-Kerner vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
240 3.00 1.00 2N E +4 ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
490 1.50 2.50 3N E +3 ♦4 2-Kremers-Duey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
490 1.50 2.50 3N E +3 ♦4 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Roy-Nelson
520 0.00 4.00 3N E +4 ♠4 1-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
|
15 |
♠974
♥JT53
♦KQ4
♣AK7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♣3 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Roy-Nelson
90 2.50 1.50 1N N ♦T 2-Kremers-Duey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
90 2.50 1.50 1N N ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
100 0.50 3.50 2N S -1 ♦5 3-Allen-Kerner vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 0.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♦2 1-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
|
16 |
♠AK75
♥J63
♦J8
♣J643
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♠A 3-Allen-Kerner vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠8 1-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ W +1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
120 1.00 3.00 2N E ♦3 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Roy-Nelson
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♦3 2-Kremers-Duey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠963
♥J92
♦J976
♣962
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 6N E -2 ♦4 1-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♦6 2-Kremers-Duey vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♦5 5-Harken-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♦4 3-Allen-Kerner vs 1-Roy-Nelson
490 1.00 3.00 3N E +3 ♦4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
|
18 |
♠T6
♥AKQ7
♦T8543
♣Q7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ N -1 ♦7 1-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 ♥4 2-Kremers-Duey vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
200 2.00 2.00 4♥* S -1 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 ♠2 3-Allen-Kerner vs 1-Roy-Nelson
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 ♥T 5-Harken-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠QJ98
♥AQT76
♦QT
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠4/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♦ W -2 ♣A 3-Allen-Kerner vs 1-Roy-Nelson
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ N ♦3 2-Kremers-Duey vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -1 ♣A 1-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ S ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -2 ♦8 5-Harken-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠Q8
♥T6
♦JT98
♣KT952
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦J 5-Harken-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ E ♥7 2-Kremers-Duey vs 4-Beiers-Cirillo
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ W +2 ♥T 3-Allen-Kerner vs 1-Roy-Nelson
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 ♦J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Clouse-Mayer
300 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -3 ♠A 1-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Turnquist-Gunter
|