1 |
♠KQT84
♥Q
♦AT92
♣QJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 3♠ N -3 ♥3 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
150 1.50 0.50 4♦ N -3 ♣A 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 3-Harken-Harken
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♠K 6-Evenden-Burk vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
2 |
♠AJ4
♥J62
♦AQ5
♣AJ52
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2/1♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♠4 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 3-Harken-Harken
90 0.50 1.50 1N N ♠2 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
90 0.50 1.50 1N N ♠2 6-Evenden-Burk vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
3 |
♠AT87
♥A82
♦AK64
♣KQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2/3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.50 0.50 3N N ♦9 6-Evenden-Burk vs 1-Smith-Smith
400 1.50 0.50 3N N ♦8 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 3-Harken-Harken
50 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♦8 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
4 |
♠AJ7
♥T4
♦76542
♣K53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S ♣T 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S ♣T 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 3-Harken-Harken
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♣T 6-Evenden-Burk vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
5 |
♠J2
♥AKQ82
♦652
♣KT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠5 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
140 0.50 1.50 3♥ N ♠6 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 3-Harken-Harken
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 ♥4 6-Evenden-Burk vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
6 |
♠854
♥KT632
♦K
♣8752
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 1.50 0.50 5♦ E +1 ♣6 1-Smith-Smith vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
620 1.50 0.50 5♦ E +1 ♣6 6-Evenden-Burk vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
1390 0.00 2.00 6♦ E +1 ♣T 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
7 |
♠A42
♥KJ
♦53
♣AKQJ92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +3 ♠5 1-Smith-Smith vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
190 0.50 1.50 3♣ N +4 ♠2 6-Evenden-Burk vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
190 0.50 1.50 3♣ N +4 ♥9 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
8 |
♠T97
♥T73
♦QJT7
♣KT9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.50 0.50 3N W ♦Q 1-Smith-Smith vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
400 1.50 0.50 3N W ♦Q 6-Evenden-Burk vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
460 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♦Q 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
9 |
♠AJT32
♥4
♦A4
♣AQT52
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 5♥* E -1 ♠4 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Harken
100 1.00 1.00 4♠* N -1 ♣J 1-Smith-Smith vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
990 0.00 2.00 4♥* E +1 ♦A 6-Evenden-Burk vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
10 |
♠AT73
♥KT732
♦T
♣T93
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3♦ S +2 ♣K 4-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Harken
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♠J 1-Smith-Smith vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
200 0.00 2.00 3N S -2 ♣5 6-Evenden-Burk vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
11 |
♠K52
♥KT52
♦K63
♣A97
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦5/4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1/2♦ 1/2♠ ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ S -1 ♣T 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
50 1.50 0.50 2♥ S -1 ♣T 6-Evenden-Burk vs 3-Harken-Harken
110 0.00 2.00 2♠ W ♥2 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
12 |
♠J62
♥AQ753
♦AJ
♣T73
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♥ 6♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.00 1.00 5♠ S +1 ♦7 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
680 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♦4 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
680 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♦2 6-Evenden-Burk vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
13 |
♠K72
♥853
♦62
♣AK865
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ -/1♠ ♣6 ♠6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ E +1 ♣9 6-Evenden-Burk vs 3-Harken-Harken
130 1.00 1.00 3♦ E +1 ♣3 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
130 1.00 1.00 2♦ E +2 ♣3 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
14 |
♠Q73
♥T93
♦AJ54
♣A32
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 1N S -1 ♥2 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
80 1.00 1.00 1♥ W ♠3 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
90 0.00 2.00 1N E ♠2 6-Evenden-Burk vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
15 |
♠95
♥KJ
♦AQT42
♣9643
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ ♣0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 1.00 1.00 5♠ W +2 ♠5 6-Evenden-Burk vs 3-Harken-Harken
510 1.00 1.00 5♠ W +2 ♦A 5-Chase-Avenmarg vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
510 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +3 ♣6 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
16 |
♠AKQT86
♥J2
♦T87
♣96
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♠ N -3 ♦A 6-Evenden-Burk vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ W +2 ♠A 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠A 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
|
17 |
♠A4
♥Q975
♦AQ74
♣A94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2/3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ W ♠A 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
170 0.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♦8 6-Evenden-Burk vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
170 0.50 1.50 2♠ W +2 ♥5 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
18 |
♠Q63
♥Q9542
♦A986
♣2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ -/1♥ ♣4 ♥6/7 ♠4/5 NT5/6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦4/5 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♥4 6-Evenden-Burk vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ W ♣2 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
170 0.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♣2 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
19 |
♠64
♥AQJ8654
♦AK4
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♥ 7♠ 7NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥1 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 1.50 0.50 5♠ S +1 ♥T 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
480 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +2 ♦Q 6-Evenden-Burk vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
100 0.00 2.00 6♥ N -2 ♣Q 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
20 |
♠KQ84
♥KQ9
♦T54
♣QT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: -/1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N E ♣2 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
120 1.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♣2 3-Harken-Harken vs 1-Smith-Smith
300 0.00 2.00 2♥ S -3 ♦9 6-Evenden-Burk vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
|
21 |
♠K98753
♥4
♦QJ
♣7632
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ ♠3/2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ N +1 ♦7 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
150 1.00 1.00 4♥ W -3 ♥4 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♣2 6-Evenden-Burk vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
|
22 |
♠J2
♥8742
♦QJ3
♣AJ83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 2.00 0.00 3♠ W +3 ♥8 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♠2 6-Evenden-Burk vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
680 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♦Q 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
23 |
♠A7
♥9852
♦A75
♣QT54
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♣5 6-Evenden-Burk vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ S ♣9 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
100 0.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♣A 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
|
24 |
♠532
♥K4
♦97542
♣987
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥K 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ S -2 ♠4 6-Evenden-Burk vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
130 0.00 2.00 4♣ E ♦A 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|
25 |
♠K6432
♥-
♦AK97
♣A854
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 1♦ 4♠ ♥4 NT5/6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥3 6-Evenden-Burk vs 5-Chase-Avenmarg
200 1.00 1.00 3♠ N +2 ♥6 1-Smith-Smith vs 4-Sterling-Llacera
50 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♥3 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Millslagle-Wesolowski
|