1 |
♠T52
♥7
♦KQ952
♣KT32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 6/5♠ 1NT ♣3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ N +2 ♠A 6-Winham-Loops vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
100 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -2 ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
150 2.00 2.00 3N S -3 ♠K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Roy-Nelson
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ W ♥7 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Tainty-Harken
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♥7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠Q52
♥T8
♦J53
♣AQJ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 ♣3 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Tainty-Harken
200 3.00 1.00 3♣ S -2 ♠A 6-Winham-Loops vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
230 2.00 2.00 3♥ E +3 ♦Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♦Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Roy-Nelson
920 0.00 4.00 6♦ W ♣A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
3 |
♠KT96
♥53
♦Q
♣J96543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♠8 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Roy-Nelson
90 3.00 1.00 2♦ S ♥6 6-Winham-Loops vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W ♦Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.50 3.50 1N W +2 ♦Q 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Tainty-Harken
150 0.50 3.50 2♦ S -3 ♠5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
4 |
♠AK95
♥QJ
♦AQ87
♣Q82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4/3 |
EW: 3♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♥4 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Tainty-Harken
120 3.50 0.50 1N N +1 ♥4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♥4 6-Winham-Loops vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
100 1.50 2.50 3♣ N -1 ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ W ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
5 |
♠J63
♥9432
♦J97
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3/4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Haley-Gunter
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥6 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Roy-Nelson
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥6 6-Winham-Loops vs 4-Tainty-Harken
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
|
6 |
♠KJ8
♥9872
♦A
♣A9764
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣2 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♦A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Roy-Nelson
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♦A 6-Winham-Loops vs 4-Tainty-Harken
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +2 ♥A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Haley-Gunter
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ N +1 ♣2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ N ♥J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
|
7 |
♠QT42
♥-
♦QJ7643
♣K92
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ -/2♥ 1♠ ♦3/5 ♥5/8 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♣5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Roy-Nelson
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♦A 6-Winham-Loops vs 4-Tainty-Harken
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ S -1 ♣6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
300 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♣3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Haley-Gunter
|
8 |
♠K74
♥A4
♦J8
♣AKJT97
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 1♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
430 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠2 6-Winham-Loops vs 4-Tainty-Harken
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ N ♥K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Haley-Gunter
130 1.50 2.50 2♣ N +2 ♦T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ N ♥K 5-Gade-Handzel vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
9 |
♠J765
♥K72
♦AT
♣KT76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♣6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Roy-Nelson
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦A 6-Winham-Loops vs 2-Haley-Gunter
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♦A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♦A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
|
10 |
♠K9
♥AK74
♦AJT3
♣J64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♦6 6-Winham-Loops vs 2-Haley-Gunter
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 ♥A 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 ♦T 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -2 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ W -1 ♣J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
11 |
♠AKT3
♥974
♦QT6
♣A96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 1N E -2 ♠7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
50 2.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♠4 6-Winham-Loops vs 2-Haley-Gunter
50 2.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♣Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Roy-Nelson
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♥K 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
120 0.00 4.00 2N E ♣3 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
|
12 |
♠8
♥A874
♦QJT653
♣Q2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
100 2.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♣7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Roy-Nelson
100 2.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♣7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.50 3.50 3N S -2 ♣7 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -2 ♣7 6-Winham-Loops vs 2-Haley-Gunter
|
13 |
♠QT8
♥AJT6432
♦J8
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Tainty-Harken
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠3 6-Winham-Loops vs 1-Roy-Nelson
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♣6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♠6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ S +1 ♥7 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Haley-Gunter
|
14 |
♠AQJ972
♥2
♦6
♣KT986
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦Q 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Haley-Gunter
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Tainty-Harken
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣J 6-Winham-Loops vs 1-Roy-Nelson
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ N ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠AQJ52
♥K9432
♦T
♣Q2
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 4♦ E +1 ♠4 6-Winham-Loops vs 1-Roy-Nelson
200 3.00 1.00 1♠* N -1 ♣A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Haley-Gunter
300 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -3 ♣A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
300 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -3 ♣A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
300 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -3 ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Tainty-Harken
|
16 |
♠AK96432
♥J
♦97
♣Q84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/-♠ ♣6/5 ♦6 ♥6/5 ♠8/6 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
200 2.50 1.50 2N E -2 ♠9 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Haley-Gunter
200 2.50 1.50 4♥ W -2 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ N ♦A 6-Winham-Loops vs 1-Roy-Nelson
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ N ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Tainty-Harken
|
17 |
♠97653
♥J2
♦A64
♣872
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Tainty-Harken
50 3.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♥J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ W ♥J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Haley-Gunter
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ W +1 ♥2 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Roy-Nelson
210 0.00 4.00 2N E +3 ♦2 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
|
18 |
♠K94
♥KQ2
♦JT
♣J8765
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣1 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Tainty-Harken
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠5 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 ♦3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♣A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +3 ♣A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
19 |
♠J9
♥QJ972
♦Q7
♣T964
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 3♠ ♣4/3 ♥4/3 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N S ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Tainty-Harken
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ S ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 ♦4 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -2 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Haley-Gunter
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W ♣T 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Roy-Nelson
|
20 |
♠T5
♥42
♦AK8
♣986532
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♥4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Tainty-Harken
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♣9 5-Gade-Handzel vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♣5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Haley-Gunter
120 1.00 3.00 1N E +1 ♥6 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Roy-Nelson
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♣9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
21 |
♠K9742
♥T
♦AK52
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 2/1NT ♦6 ♥4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♥A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Tainty-Harken
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♦6 6-Winham-Loops vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♦9 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Haley-Gunter
|
22 |
♠AKJ63
♥QJ9652
♦6
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣5 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♣5 6-Winham-Loops vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
200 1.50 2.50 5♦ E -2 ♣K 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
200 1.50 2.50 5♣ W -2 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Haley-Gunter
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ E -1 ♠7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Tainty-Harken
|
23 |
♠Q82
♥876
♦J975
♣J75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3/2♦ 6♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ W +1 ♥8 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
650 3.50 0.50 5♥ E ♠J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Haley-Gunter
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♥7 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Tainty-Harken
710 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +3 ♠J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
1430 0.00 4.00 6♥ E ♣A 6-Winham-Loops vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
|
24 |
♠K94
♥KJ642
♦A765
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♦8 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
460 3.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠3 6-Winham-Loops vs 6-Stolzberg-Riley
430 2.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Haley-Gunter
180 1.00 3.00 2N S +2 ♦Q 5-Gade-Handzel vs 4-Tainty-Harken
170 0.00 4.00 1♥ N +3 ♠3 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Mayer-Clouse
|