1 |
♠T6532
♥6542
♦KT
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦5/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♣J 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
420 1.00 1.00 4♥ S ♦Q 4-Harken-Walker vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
50 0.00 2.00 5♥ S -1 ♦Q 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
2 |
♠J63
♥83
♦J97
♣A7642
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠K 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
140 1.00 1.00 3♥ E ♠Q 4-Harken-Walker vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♥9 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
3 |
♠T654
♥AJ4
♦43
♣QJ53
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6/5 ♥5 ♠3/2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣T 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ N ♥6 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦K 4-Harken-Walker vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
|
4 |
♠7432
♥74
♦K74
♣J975
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 5♣ S ♥4 4-Harken-Walker vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
130 1.00 1.00 1♦ S +3 ♥A 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ W ♦4 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
5 |
♠T
♥K
♦JT82
♣KQ87652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2/3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.50 0.50 5♣ S ♥3 4-Harken-Walker vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
600 1.50 0.50 5♣ N ♠4 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
170 0.00 2.00 3♣ N +3 ♥2 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
6 |
♠AQ86
♥T9
♦AKT62
♣T4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/-♠ ♦6 ♥4 ♠7/6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣2 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.50 0.50 5♣ S ♥A 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
400 1.50 0.50 5♣ S ♥A 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
150 0.00 2.00 4♣ S +1 ♥A 4-Harken-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
7 |
♠KQT654
♥KJ84
♦K
♣J2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♠ N -1 ♦5 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
100 1.50 0.50 3♠ N -1 ♦3 4-Harken-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♣J 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
|
8 |
♠AT
♥AQ4
♦Q643
♣KQ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 2♥ 5NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥5 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♥J 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
460 1.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♣5 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
430 0.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♥J 4-Harken-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
9 |
♠6432
♥QT7
♦T82
♣862
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5/6♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 ♦3 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
650 1.00 1.00 4♥ E +1 ♠T 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
660 0.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠2 4-Harken-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
10 |
♠AQJ93
♥A
♦J9632
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1/2NT ♦4 ♠3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 3♠ N +1 ♣2 4-Harken-Walker vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
140 1.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥J 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
130 0.00 2.00 4♣ E ♠2 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
|
11 |
♠J4
♥J85
♦KT32
♣KJT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ E +3 ♣3 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 4-Harken-Walker
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ W ♦2 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
420 0.50 1.50 4♠ E ♦A 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
12 |
♠QJ
♥J74
♦Q63
♣QT873
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ E ♠3 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 4-Harken-Walker
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♣A 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
300 0.00 2.00 4♣ N -3 ♥A 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
13 |
♠943
♥AQJT72
♦T3
♣QT
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ W +1 ♠3 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 4-Harken-Walker
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ W +1 ♠3 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♥A 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
|
14 |
♠J87
♥KQ4
♦-
♣KJT8732
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦1 ♥5/4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♦ -/1♥ 5/6♠ 6NT ♣6 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥5 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
170 1.00 1.00 3♦ W +3 ♣J 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 4-Harken-Walker
490 0.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♥7 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
|
15 |
♠K95
♥9873
♦92
♣8543
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4/5 ♦3/4 ♥6 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♣ 3/2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♦ W +1 ♠5 5-Wesolowski-Suddards vs 4-Harken-Walker
200 0.50 1.50 3♠ S -2 ♠T 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 3-Avenmarg-Smith
200 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -2 ♠T 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
|
16 |
♠AQ7
♥K654
♦A6
♣KQ82
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.50 0.50 2N N ♠6 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
120 1.50 0.50 2N N ♣6 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♦6 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Harken-Walker
|
17 |
♠K985
♥T64
♦T985
♣82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦0 ♥0 ♠6 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 7♦ 7♥ 6NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 2.00 0.00 4♥ E +3 ♣Q 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
980 1.00 1.00 6♥ E ♠Q 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Harken-Walker
1010 0.00 2.00 6♥ E +1 ♦3 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
|
18 |
♠KQ8
♥Q3
♦872
♣T8543
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 ♣A 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
100 1.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♦A 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Harken-Walker
150 0.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♠3 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
|
19 |
♠J43
♥AT9
♦QJ973
♣96
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ S +1 ♣A 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
130 1.50 0.50 3♦ S +1 ♣A 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Harken-Walker
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ S ♣A 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
|
20 |
♠AQ9
♥QJ7
♦AQJ73
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♠3 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 4-Harken-Walker
90 0.50 1.50 1N N ♠3 2-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
90 0.50 1.50 1N N ♦T 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 1-Johnson-Reuben
|
21 |
♠J874
♥K52
♦QT64
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♣A 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
90 1.00 1.00 2♣ E ♣A 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Walker
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♣A 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
|
22 |
♠AJ5
♥T832
♦QJ7
♣AK6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 1.00 1.00 1N N ♠4 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Walker
90 1.00 1.00 1N N ♠4 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
90 1.00 1.00 1N N ♠4 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
|
23 |
♠T643
♥Q5
♦J873
♣AT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥1 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ W +2 ♠3 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ W +2 ♦8 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
1430 0.00 2.00 6♥ E ♠9 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Walker
|
24 |
♠Q875
♥A
♦T6
♣J97542
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♥A 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♥Q 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♠5 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Walker
|
25 |
♠9876
♥Q9
♦97653
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 6♣ E -2 ♥7 6-Modest-Shipman Jr vs 5-Wesolowski-Suddards
660 0.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♠9 3-Avenmarg-Smith vs 2-Sterling-Llacera
660 0.50 1.50 3N E +2 ♥7 1-Johnson-Reuben vs 4-Harken-Walker
|