1 |
♠3
♥AQT7
♦AK8
♣AQT82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4/5 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ E -4 ♣7 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Haley-Gunter
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Harken-Tainty
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 ♠8 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Thomas-Payne
50 1.00 3.00 2♥ E -1 ♠Q 2-Allen-Osborn vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
50 0.00 4.00 2♦ S -1 ♠8 3-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠KT6
♥Q3
♦965
♣KT742
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 2♦ E +2 ♥Q 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Haley-Gunter
400 3.00 1.00 3N E ♠3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Thomas-Payne
430 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠3 3-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
430 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Harken-Tainty
460 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♠3 2-Allen-Osborn vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
3 |
♠A7
♥A6
♦KT4
♣QJT754
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♣Q 3-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 2.50 1.50 2N E -2 ♣9 2-Allen-Osborn vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
200 2.50 1.50 2N E -2 ♣9 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Thomas-Payne
50 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Harken-Tainty
50 0.50 3.50 3♣ N -1 ♥3 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Haley-Gunter
|
4 |
♠754
♥A
♦864
♣AKQJT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N S -1 ♥J 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Thomas-Payne
100 3.50 0.50 3♣ N -1 ♥2 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 1-Haley-Gunter
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W ♣A 3-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -2 ♦K 2-Allen-Osborn vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.50 3.50 5♣ N -2 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
5 |
♠AK9643
♥9
♦6
♣QT964
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣A 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Haley-Gunter
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +2 ♣A 2-Allen-Osborn vs 2-Harken-Tainty
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ N +1 ♣A 3-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Thomas-Payne
210 0.00 4.00 2N E +3 ♠J 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
6 |
♠83
♥T76
♦9653
♣KT98
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ W ♣8 3-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Thomas-Payne
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Haley-Gunter
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♣Q 2-Allen-Osborn vs 2-Harken-Tainty
680 0.50 3.50 5♠ W +1 ♦3 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
680 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 ♣8 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
7 |
♠AQJT6
♥Q874
♦KQ
♣87
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦2 NT6 |
EW: 5♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ N -1 ♦9 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ N -1 ♦8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Haley-Gunter
400 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -4 ♣A 2-Allen-Osborn vs 2-Harken-Tainty
750 1.00 3.00 5♦* E ♠K 3-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Thomas-Payne
1400 0.00 4.00 5♠* N -5 ♣A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
8 |
♠AQ874
♥963
♦QJT
♣Q4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♠7 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
100 3.50 0.50 5♦* W -1 ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Haley-Gunter
120 2.00 2.00 2N W ♠7 2-Allen-Osborn vs 2-Harken-Tainty
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♠6 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ W +2 ♠A 3-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Thomas-Payne
|
9 |
♠72
♥AJT73
♦QJ974
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣4 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Thomas-Payne
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Harken-Tainty
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦T 2-Allen-Osborn vs 1-Haley-Gunter
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ N ♦T 3-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
10 |
♠T63
♥T7532
♦Q8
♣QT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4/3♦ 2♥ 3/2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♣Q 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Thomas-Payne
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ E +2 ♦6 2-Allen-Osborn vs 1-Haley-Gunter
150 1.00 3.00 2N E +1 ♦3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Harken-Tainty
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♠2 3-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
11 |
♠K983
♥Q9
♦75
♣Q7643
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♣4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♣2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Harken-Tainty
100 2.00 2.00 3♣ S -2 ♥J 2-Allen-Osborn vs 1-Haley-Gunter
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♣3 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Thomas-Payne
150 0.00 4.00 4♣ S -3 ♦2 3-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
12 |
♠Q
♥AKJ765
♦J5
♣KJ96
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♥A 2-Allen-Osborn vs 1-Haley-Gunter
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♥8 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 4-Thomas-Payne
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♥8 3-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♥2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
13 |
♠J64
♥-
♦AQJ862
♣K743
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 4♠ 5NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Thomas-Payne
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ S ♠9 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Haley-Gunter
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ S +2 ♠9 3-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Harken-Tainty
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ S ♣5 2-Allen-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♣5 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
14 |
♠95
♥J
♦862
♣AKQ8532
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠4 2-Allen-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -4 ♣6 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Haley-Gunter
170 2.00 2.00 4♣ N +2 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Thomas-Payne
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ S +1 ♠3 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
50 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♠3 3-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
15 |
♠KJ43
♥87
♦632
♣9873
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 5♥ ♦7/6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1♦ S +1 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Thomas-Payne
90 3.50 0.50 1♦ S +1 ♣5 2-Allen-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 2.00 1♦ S -1 ♣6 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W ♦6 3-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Harken-Tainty
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +3 ♠3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Haley-Gunter
|
16 |
♠J9872
♥5
♦QT76
♣A62
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♦5 3-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Harken-Tainty
110 3.00 1.00 2♣ N +1 ♦A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Haley-Gunter
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♠A 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
50 1.00 3.00 4♣ S -1 ♥8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Thomas-Payne
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♠A 2-Allen-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠AT642
♥85
♦J
♣KQ972
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ W +1 ♥8 2-Allen-Osborn vs 4-Thomas-Payne
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ W +2 ♣K 3-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Haley-Gunter
400 2.00 2.00 3N E ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
430 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♥6 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
460 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♠3 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
18 |
♠T532
♥4
♦K9632
♣T93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 1NT ♣3 ♥1 ♠6 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♦ S -2 ♥5 2-Allen-Osborn vs 4-Thomas-Payne
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ E ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♠9 3-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Haley-Gunter
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♦A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
480 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +2 ♣A 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
19 |
♠T
♥942
♦A84
♣AKJ986
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥7 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Harken-Tainty
150 3.00 1.00 2♣ N +3 ♣4 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ N ♠4 3-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Haley-Gunter
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ N ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♠6 2-Allen-Osborn vs 4-Thomas-Payne
|
20 |
♠T642
♥K96
♦76
♣A652
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6/5 ♥4/3 NT6/5 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 5♥ W -3 ♠2 1-Suddards-Davidson vs 2-Harken-Tainty
200 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♦7 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 1♦ E -1 ♠K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.50 2.50 3♣ E -1 ♠K 3-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Haley-Gunter
90 0.00 4.00 1♦ E +1 ♣Q 2-Allen-Osborn vs 4-Thomas-Payne
|