1 |
♠QJ95
♥T54
♦Q82
♣T86
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♥T 5-Belden-Smyth vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
100 4.50 0.50 5♦* E -1 ♥A 9-Benich-Oing vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
50 3.00 2.00 5♣ E -1 ♥A 6-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Smith-Smith
400 2.00 3.00 3N E ♥6 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
460 1.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♥A 3-Hullman-Burk vs 11-Benz-Benich
490 0.00 5.00 3N E +3 ♥6 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
|
2 |
♠52
♥KQT95
♦Q962
♣32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.50 0.50 3♥ S +1 ♠3 9-Benich-Oing vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
170 4.50 0.50 2♥ S +2 ♥2 3-Hullman-Burk vs 11-Benz-Benich
140 3.00 2.00 3♥ S ♦5 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
120 2.00 3.00 1N S +1 ♥6 5-Belden-Smyth vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♠3 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
110 0.00 5.00 2♠ W ♥K 6-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Smith-Smith
|
3 |
♠AJ2
♥A5
♦T876432
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 5.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣6 5-Belden-Smyth vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
150 4.00 1.00 3♦ N +2 ♠6 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
130 1.50 3.50 3♦ N +1 ♠T 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
130 1.50 3.50 3♦ N +1 ♠8 3-Hullman-Burk vs 11-Benz-Benich
130 1.50 3.50 3♦ N +1 ♠8 6-Johnson-Keen vs 10-Smith-Smith
130 1.50 3.50 2♦ N +2 ♠8 9-Benich-Oing vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
|
4 |
♠J
♥KQJ42
♦J5
♣QJ952
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ W ♥K 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ W ♥K 6-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Hullman-Burk
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ W ♥K 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 10-Smith-Smith
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ W ♥K 11-Benz-Benich vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
650 0.50 4.50 4♠ W +1 ♣Q 9-Benich-Oing vs 5-Belden-Smyth
650 0.50 4.50 4♥ W +1 ♥K 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
|
5 |
♠J
♥9854
♦984
♣AKQ32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3/2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♠ E +1 ♣J 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 10-Smith-Smith
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ E ♥3 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ E ♣J 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 ♠5 9-Benich-Oing vs 5-Belden-Smyth
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 ♥3 6-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Hullman-Burk
480 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +2 ♥3 11-Benz-Benich vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
|
6 |
♠-
♥KJT9873
♦862
♣KJ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6/-NT ♠5 NT12/6 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +3 ♦Q 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 10-Smith-Smith
480 4.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♦3 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
450 1.50 3.50 4♥ S +1 ♦3 9-Benich-Oing vs 5-Belden-Smyth
450 1.50 3.50 4♥ N +1 ♠Q 6-Johnson-Keen vs 3-Hullman-Burk
450 1.50 3.50 4♥ N +1 ♠Q 11-Benz-Benich vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
450 1.50 3.50 4♥ N +1 ♠Q 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
|
7 |
♠JT6
♥AJ82
♦9643
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥2 11-Benz-Benich vs 5-Belden-Smyth
180 4.00 1.00 1N E +3 ♠9 10-Smith-Smith vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
630 1.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♠9 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Benich-Oing
630 1.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠9 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
630 1.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠9 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Hullman-Burk
630 1.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠4 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 6-Johnson-Keen
|
8 |
♠QT942
♥Q
♦A75
♣T983
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2/1NT ♣6 ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 2♥ E +2 ♦T 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 6-Johnson-Keen
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦T 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Benich-Oing
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦T 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Hullman-Burk
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦6 10-Smith-Smith vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
450 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 ♠8 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
450 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 ♦T 11-Benz-Benich vs 5-Belden-Smyth
|
9 |
♠AK
♥AK5
♦AQT853
♣K8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3/4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥2 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 6-Johnson-Keen
430 4.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣Q 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
430 4.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣7 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 9-Benich-Oing
420 2.00 3.00 5♣ N +1 ♦J 10-Smith-Smith vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
100 1.00 4.00 6♦ S -2 ♣2 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 3-Hullman-Burk
500 0.00 5.00 6N* N -3 ♠T 11-Benz-Benich vs 5-Belden-Smyth
|
10 |
♠T43
♥A
♦KJ92
♣J6543
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 4/5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 6♥ E -2 ♦7 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
100 4.00 1.00 6♥ W -1 ♣4 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 5-Belden-Smyth
620 3.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣T 10-Smith-Smith vs 9-Benich-Oing
650 1.00 4.00 5♥ E ♣T 11-Benz-Benich vs 6-Johnson-Keen
650 1.00 4.00 5♥ E ♣9 3-Hullman-Burk vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣7 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
|
11 |
♠4
♥KQ542
♦T95
♣KT65
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♦J 10-Smith-Smith vs 9-Benich-Oing
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 ♦J 3-Hullman-Burk vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
50 3.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♥K 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 5-Belden-Smyth
50 2.00 3.00 1N N -1 ♦J 11-Benz-Benich vs 6-Johnson-Keen
100 1.00 4.00 3♣ S -2 ♦A 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
800 0.00 5.00 5♥* N -4 ♦J 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
|
12 |
♠7652
♥Q9
♦QJ42
♣764
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 1.00 3♥ W ♦Q 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♦Q 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 ♦2 11-Benz-Benich vs 6-Johnson-Keen
170 2.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♠6 10-Smith-Smith vs 9-Benich-Oing
200 0.50 4.50 2♥ W +3 ♠7 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 5-Belden-Smyth
200 0.50 4.50 2♥ W +3 ♦Q 3-Hullman-Burk vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
|
13 |
♠QT732
♥AQ84
♦9
♣AK8
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 4.50 0.50 6♥ S ♦2 4-Evenden-Ottenberg vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
1430 4.50 0.50 6♥ S ♣Q 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 11-Benz-Benich
680 1.50 3.50 5♥ S +1 ♥2 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 10-Smith-Smith
680 1.50 3.50 5♥ S +1 ♦2 3-Hullman-Burk vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
680 1.50 3.50 4♥ S +2 ♣Q 9-Benich-Oing vs 6-Johnson-Keen
680 1.50 3.50 4♥ N +2 ♥5 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Belden-Smyth
|
14 |
♠K543
♥A
♦KQJT83
♣K3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/6♦ 5NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦1 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 5.00 0.00 6♦ S ♣6 4-Evenden-Ottenberg vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
500 4.00 1.00 5♠* W -3 ♥A 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 11-Benz-Benich
430 3.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♥5 3-Hullman-Burk vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
420 2.00 3.00 5♦ S +1 ♠A 9-Benich-Oing vs 6-Johnson-Keen
300 1.00 4.00 4♠* W -2 ♦K 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Belden-Smyth
150 0.00 5.00 3♠ W -3 ♦K 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 10-Smith-Smith
|
15 |
♠AKT9853
♥KT
♦AT8
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥1 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦Q 3-Hullman-Burk vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♦Q 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 10-Smith-Smith
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♦Q 4-Evenden-Ottenberg vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♦Q 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 11-Benz-Benich
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♦Q 9-Benich-Oing vs 6-Johnson-Keen
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ N ♦9 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 5-Belden-Smyth
|
16 |
♠AQ3
♥AT
♦KJT85
♣K93
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥8 5-Belden-Smyth vs 3-Hullman-Burk
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ N ♦2 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
420 3.50 1.50 4♠ N ♦2 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Johnson-Keen
170 2.00 3.00 3♠ N +1 ♥K 4-Evenden-Ottenberg vs 9-Benich-Oing
50 1.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♦2 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 11-Benz-Benich
150 0.00 5.00 3N N -3 ♥9 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 10-Smith-Smith
|
17 |
♠953
♥65432
♦T
♣K932
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1/-NT ♥5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♥A 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 10-Smith-Smith
50 3.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♠J 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
50 3.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 ♠A 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Johnson-Keen
140 2.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♥A 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 11-Benz-Benich
170 1.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 ♥A 4-Evenden-Ottenberg vs 9-Benich-Oing
300 0.00 5.00 4♥* N -2 ♠A 5-Belden-Smyth vs 3-Hullman-Burk
|
18 |
♠AKQ43
♥J62
♦A74
♣83
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♣6 1-Wainer-Wainer vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
150 4.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♣6 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 10-Smith-Smith
120 3.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♣6 4-Evenden-Ottenberg vs 9-Benich-Oing
90 2.00 3.00 1N S ♥Q 5-Belden-Smyth vs 3-Hullman-Burk
100 0.50 4.50 1N S -1 ♣T 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 11-Benz-Benich
100 0.50 4.50 1N S -1 ♣6 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 6-Johnson-Keen
|
19 |
♠9874
♥AKJ3
♦J3
♣J62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♣ W ♥A 5-Belden-Smyth vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
120 3.50 1.50 2N E ♥4 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
120 3.50 1.50 1N E +1 ♥4 6-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
130 1.50 3.50 2♦ E +2 ♥4 11-Benz-Benich vs 9-Benich-Oing
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ W +1 ♥A 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
150 0.00 5.00 2N E +1 ♥4 10-Smith-Smith vs 3-Hullman-Burk
|
20 |
♠8
♥AQT7
♦AQ752
♣864
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.50 1.50 5♥ S +1 ♠A 5-Belden-Smyth vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
680 3.50 1.50 5♥ S +1 ♠A 10-Smith-Smith vs 3-Hullman-Burk
680 3.50 1.50 5♥ S +1 ♣K 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
680 3.50 1.50 5♥ N +1 ♦4 6-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
790 0.50 4.50 4♠* E ♦3 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
790 0.50 4.50 4♠* E ♣A 11-Benz-Benich vs 9-Benich-Oing
|
21 |
♠A963
♥AK87
♦J95
♣A4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 5.00 0.00 3♦* W -4 ♥A 6-Johnson-Keen vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
660 4.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♥T 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 7-Friedberg-Seldeen
600 2.50 2.50 3N N ♣T 11-Benz-Benich vs 9-Benich-Oing
600 2.50 2.50 3N N ♣5 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
100 1.00 4.00 2♦* W -1 ♥A 5-Belden-Smyth vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
100 0.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♣5 10-Smith-Smith vs 3-Hullman-Burk
|
22 |
♠K7
♥QJ986
♦AJ4
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 5NT ♦6 ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♠A 3-Hullman-Burk vs 9-Benich-Oing
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠A 11-Benz-Benich vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠A 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
420 3.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦3 6-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
130 1.00 4.00 4♣ S ♠Q 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 5-Belden-Smyth
50 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -1 ♠A 10-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
|
23 |
♠A52
♥JT5
♦63
♣K8763
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♠8 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 5-Belden-Smyth
90 4.00 1.00 2♦ W ♣6 3-Hullman-Burk vs 9-Benich-Oing
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ E ♦J 6-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ W ♠A 11-Benz-Benich vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ W ♣4 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
150 0.00 5.00 2N E +1 ♥6 10-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
|
24 |
♠5
♥KJ97
♦AK76
♣QT74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2/1♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 5.00 0.00 4♠* W -5 ♦A 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 5-Belden-Smyth
500 4.00 1.00 3♠* W -3 ♦A 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 8-Diola-Sabloff
400 3.00 2.00 3N N ♣8 10-Smith-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Ottenberg
210 2.00 3.00 2N N +3 ♥8 11-Benz-Benich vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
50 1.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♦4 6-Johnson-Keen vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
110 0.00 5.00 2♠ W ♦A 3-Hullman-Burk vs 9-Benich-Oing
|
25 |
♠96
♥AJ9863
♦Q87
♣JT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♦T 5-Belden-Smyth vs 10-Smith-Smith
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ N ♠K 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 6-Johnson-Keen
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ N ♠5 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Benich-Oing
100 2.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 ♥2 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 11-Benz-Benich
50 0.50 4.50 3♥ N -1 ♠K 4-Evenden-Ottenberg vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
50 0.50 4.50 3♥ N -1 ♠K 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 3-Hullman-Burk
|
26 |
♠Q3
♥AK53
♦75
♣AK862
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 1.00 3N S +3 ♦Q 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Benich-Oing
690 4.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♠2 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 11-Benz-Benich
690 4.00 1.00 3N N +3 ♣J 4-Evenden-Ottenberg vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
660 1.00 4.00 3N S +2 ♦Q 5-Belden-Smyth vs 10-Smith-Smith
660 1.00 4.00 3N N +2 ♦8 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 3-Hullman-Burk
660 1.00 4.00 3N N +2 ♦8 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 6-Johnson-Keen
|
27 |
♠7
♥T
♦KQ643
♣AJT953
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 5♦* S +1 ♠K 7-Friedberg-Seldeen vs 3-Hullman-Burk
50 3.50 1.50 5♠ W -1 ♦K 4-Evenden-Ottenberg vs 1-Wainer-Wainer
50 3.50 1.50 5♠ W -1 ♦K 8-Diola-Sabloff vs 6-Johnson-Keen
170 2.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♥T 12-Maggipinto-Wasserstrom vs 9-Benich-Oing
420 0.50 4.50 4♠ W ♥T 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 11-Benz-Benich
420 0.50 4.50 4♠ W ♥T 5-Belden-Smyth vs 10-Smith-Smith
|