1 |
♠Q5
♥9543
♦JT32
♣T43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 6♦ 4♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 3.00 1.00 4♠ E +3 ♥Q 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
510 3.00 1.00 4♠ E +3 ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Williams-Dean
510 3.00 1.00 4♠ E +3 ♥Q 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Haley-Cole
1010 1.00 3.00 6♠ E +1 ♥Q 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Harken-Tainty
1020 0.00 4.00 6N W +1 ♥3 6-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠KQ
♥AKQ8763
♦84
♣32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-♦ 5/4♥ 5/4NT ♦7/6 ♠5/4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦9 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Haley-Cole
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦9 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦9 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Harken-Tainty
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ N +1 ♦9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Williams-Dean
170 0.50 3.50 3♥ N +1 ♦9 6-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
3 |
♠QJ94
♥Q96
♦A4
♣AT54
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N ♥4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Haley-Cole
150 3.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Williams-Dean
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ S ♥K 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♣6 6-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
70 0.00 4.00 1♦ W ♠4 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
4 |
♠65
♥T952
♦J832
♣K93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♦5 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♥4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Haley-Cole
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Williams-Dean
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♠A 6-Cowen-Burk vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E ♥4 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
5 |
♠KJ97
♥AT
♦A43
♣K872
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6/5♦ 3/2♥ 3♠ 6/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠5 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥2 6-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Harken-Tainty
600 2.00 2.00 3N N ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
180 1.00 3.00 2N N +2 ♠5 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 6-Williams-Dean
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ S +2 ♠T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Thomas-Payne
|
6 |
♠86
♥Q86
♦KQ92
♣8654
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5/6 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ E +1 ♣K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Thomas-Payne
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ E ♣K 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 6-Williams-Dean
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ E ♣Q 6-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Harken-Tainty
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♣3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠952
♥K4
♦KJT975
♣43
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥2 ♠3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 1.00 4♦ S ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♠Q 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 6-Williams-Dean
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♠Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Thomas-Payne
100 1.00 3.00 3♦ N -1 ♠K 6-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Harken-Tainty
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E ♣8 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
|
8 |
♠KT92
♥KQJ7
♦T86
♣62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ E +2 ♦3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
180 3.00 1.00 2N E +2 ♠8 6-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Harken-Tainty
400 2.00 2.00 3N E ♠4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Thomas-Payne
430 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
430 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♥8 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 6-Williams-Dean
|
9 |
♠K974
♥T972
♦J642
♣5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠3 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ S +1 ♥J 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ S +1 ♥J 6-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Thomas-Payne
130 3.00 1.00 1♣ S +3 ♥J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
100 1.00 3.00 2♦ W -1 ♣5 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Haley-Cole
50 0.00 4.00 4N S -1 ♦T 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Williams-Dean
|
10 |
♠K75
♥Q65
♦AQ643
♣Q5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♦J 6-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Thomas-Payne
650 3.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♣9 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥T 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥T 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Williams-Dean
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ S +2 ♣9 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
11 |
♠KT54
♥K6
♦AJ63
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5/6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣8 6-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Thomas-Payne
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♦Q 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♣7 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Haley-Cole
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♦Q 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Williams-Dean
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♣T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
|
12 |
♠7643
♥93
♦Q94
♣Q874
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ W +2 ♣4 6-Cowen-Burk vs 2-Thomas-Payne
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♠7 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♦4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Williams-Dean
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♣4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♣4 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
13 |
♠K9
♥QJ85
♦J83
♣K942
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♠J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Williams-Dean
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♦9 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 3-Haley-Cole
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♥2 6-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ S +1 ♦A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Thomas-Payne
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
14 |
♠7
♥K632
♦QJ9
♣QJ762
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♣A 6-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♦5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Harken-Tainty
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♣9 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Thomas-Payne
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ W +1 ♠7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Williams-Dean
500 0.00 4.00 4♠* S -3 ♦5 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
15 |
♠QT52
♥KQJ76
♦KT
♣Q3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Harken-Tainty
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♣5 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 3-Haley-Cole
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♣7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Williams-Dean
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ W -1 ♣Q 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Thomas-Payne
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♦3 6-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
|
16 |
♠KQJT43
♥7
♦3
♣J8742
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2/1♦ ♣2 ♥6/5 ♠3/2 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Harken-Tainty
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N ♥Q 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Thomas-Payne
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ S ♥5 6-Cowen-Burk vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
100 1.00 3.00 3♦ W -1 ♠K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Williams-Dean
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 ♣Q 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
17 |
♠Q5
♥92
♦KJ632
♣KQ43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♠J 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 2-Thomas-Payne
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ N ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Harken-Tainty
100 2.00 2.00 1♣ W -2 ♠7 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♥5 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
18 |
♠QJT642
♥Q3
♦Q765
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 5/4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ E ♠9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Cole
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ E ♠3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♠9 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 2-Thomas-Payne
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦T 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♣K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
19 |
♠K
♥A863
♦AQJ2
♣AJ76
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 4.00 0.00 6♦ S ♠A 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 2-Thomas-Payne
300 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -3 ♦2 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
200 2.00 2.00 3♠* W -1 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Cole
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ S ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Harken-Tainty
1130 0.00 4.00 3♠* W +2 ♥3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠KT43
♥J
♦A954
♣AK43
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 2/3♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦8 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦8 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Harken-Tainty
650 2.50 1.50 1-Ford-Turnquist vs 2-Thomas-Payne
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ N ♦8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
21 |
♠9642
♥T95
♦Q2
♣T942
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 6N E -1 ♠5 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Harken-Tainty
130 3.00 1.00 4♣ W ♥Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Haley-Cole
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♦Q 6-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Williams-Dean
460 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Thomas-Payne
920 0.00 4.00 6♦ E ♣3 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
22 |
♠-
♥QJT9876
♦63
♣KJ32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♥3 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.50 0.50 4♦ E -1 ♥4 6-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Williams-Dean
120 1.50 2.50 2N E ♠Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Thomas-Payne
120 1.50 2.50 2N E ♥3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Harken-Tainty
300 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -2 ♦A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Haley-Cole
|
23 |
♠AQ965
♥T2
♦9532
♣83
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N E ♠T 6-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Williams-Dean
630 2.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♠6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Haley-Cole
630 2.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♥2 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Harken-Tainty
690 1.00 3.00 3N W +3 ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Thomas-Payne
720 0.00 4.00 3N E +4 ♦Q 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
24 |
♠A94
♥8
♦QJ862
♣JT62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 6♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N E +1 ♥3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Harken-Tainty
450 3.00 1.00 4♥ E +1 ♦Q 6-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Williams-Dean
460 2.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♦6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Haley-Cole
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♦Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Thomas-Payne
980 0.00 4.00 6♥ W ♠A 3-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|