1 |
♠985
♥AQ832
♦JT3
♣QJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♠ S ♥T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Thomas-Payne
50 5.00 1.00 2♦ E -1 ♥4 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Harken-Tainty
PASS 3.50 2.50 Pass Out 2-McCabe-Gift vs 3-Haley-Gunter
PASS 3.50 2.50 Pass Out 3-Smith-Davidson vs 5-Harken-Winham
50 2.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♥5 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
100 1.00 5.00 3♠ S -2 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Brown
150 0.00 6.00 1N E +2 ♠A 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠J98653
♥Q6
♦86
♣762
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠6 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
90 5.00 1.00 2♦ W ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Thomas-Payne
110 2.50 3.50 2♠ E ♥A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
110 2.50 3.50 3♦ W ♥Q 2-McCabe-Gift vs 3-Haley-Gunter
110 2.50 3.50 2♦ W +1 ♥Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Brown
110 2.50 3.50 2♦ W +1 ♥Q 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Harken-Tainty
150 0.00 6.00 1N W +2 ♥Q 3-Smith-Davidson vs 5-Harken-Winham
|
3 |
♠KJT865
♥AJ
♦-
♣KT875
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 6.00 0.00 4♠* N +1 ♦A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
450 5.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 7-Thomas-Payne
420 3.50 2.50 4♠ S ♦A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Harken-Tainty
420 3.50 2.50 4♠ N ♦A 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 1.50 4.50 3♠ N +1 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Cowen-Brown
170 1.50 4.50 3♠ N +1 ♦A 2-McCabe-Gift vs 3-Haley-Gunter
50 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -1 ♦A 3-Smith-Davidson vs 5-Harken-Winham
|
4 |
♠KT8632
♥AKT7
♦5
♣J8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣Q 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Cowen-Brown
170 3.00 3.00 3♠ N +1 ♣Q 2-McCabe-Gift vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
170 3.00 3.00 3♠ N +1 ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.00 3.00 3♠ N +1 ♣2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Thomas-Payne
170 3.00 3.00 2♠ N +2 ♣Q 3-Smith-Davidson vs 4-Harken-Tainty
170 3.00 3.00 2♠ N +2 ♣Q 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 5-Harken-Winham
130 0.00 6.00 2♣ W +2 ♥A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
5 |
♠T98654
♥97
♦A
♣AKJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 3♠ N ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 5.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Thomas-Payne
100 4.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♦6 3-Smith-Davidson vs 4-Harken-Tainty
150 3.00 3.00 3♦ W +2 ♣A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Haley-Gunter
420 2.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠A 2-McCabe-Gift vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
550 0.50 5.50 5♦* W ♣A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Cowen-Brown
550 0.50 5.50 5♦* E ♠A 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 5-Harken-Winham
|
6 |
♠AK5
♥A8
♦K43
♣QJ654
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 5♠ 5/4NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 7-Thomas-Payne
450 4.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥7 2-McCabe-Gift vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
450 4.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥7 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 1-Cowen-Brown
450 4.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥3 3-Smith-Davidson vs 4-Harken-Tainty
450 4.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 5.00 2♠ S +3 ♥5 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 3-Haley-Gunter
170 0.00 6.00 3♠ S +1 ♦Q 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 5-Harken-Winham
|
7 |
♠-
♥KQ98762
♦J65
♣QJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠J 3-Smith-Davidson vs 3-Haley-Gunter
650 5.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠7 2-McCabe-Gift vs 1-Cowen-Brown
200 4.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 ♦J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♦K 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 7-Thomas-Payne
100 1.50 4.50 3♠ W -1 ♥K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Harken-Winham
100 1.50 4.50 3♠ W -1 ♦J 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
800 0.00 6.00 5♦* S -3 ♠2 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
8 |
♠975
♥83
♦KT6543
♣72
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4/3♥ 3/2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♦5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Harken-Winham
50 5.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♦5 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 7-Thomas-Payne
150 3.50 2.50 2N W +1 ♦5 3-Smith-Davidson vs 3-Haley-Gunter
150 3.50 2.50 1N E +2 ♦5 2-McCabe-Gift vs 1-Cowen-Brown
400 2.00 4.00 3N W ♦5 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
430 0.50 5.50 3N W +1 ♦5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
430 0.50 5.50 3N W +1 ♦5 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
9 |
♠T5
♥KT7
♦AJ952
♣A73
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦Q 2-McCabe-Gift vs 1-Cowen-Brown
200 5.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 ♠T 3-Smith-Davidson vs 3-Haley-Gunter
170 3.50 2.50 2♠ S +2 ♦3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 7-Thomas-Payne
170 3.50 2.50 2♠ S +2 ♦3 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
150 2.00 4.00 2N N +1 ♦K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Harken-Winham
50 0.50 5.50 3N N -1 ♦K 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.50 5.50 3N N -1 ♦K 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
10 |
♠7
♥AQ652
♦QJT65
♣85
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥4 2-McCabe-Gift vs 7-Thomas-Payne
620 5.00 1.00 4♠ E ♦3 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Cowen-Brown
620 5.00 1.00 4♠ E ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Harken-Tainty
650 1.50 4.50 4♠ E +1 ♥4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Harken-Winham
650 1.50 4.50 4♠ E +1 ♥4 3-Smith-Davidson vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
650 1.50 4.50 4♠ E +1 ♥4 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
650 1.50 4.50 4♠ E +1 ♦7 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
11 |
♠7632
♥4
♦J63
♣AJ832
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Harken-Tainty
400 5.00 1.00 3N S ♠5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Harken-Winham
50 3.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♠5 2-McCabe-Gift vs 7-Thomas-Payne
50 3.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♠5 3-Smith-Davidson vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
100 1.00 5.00 3N S -2 ♠5 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 5.00 3N S -2 ♠5 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Cowen-Brown
100 1.00 5.00 3♦ N -2 ♥2 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
12 |
♠873
♥QJ
♦AK752
♣A94
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♥7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Harken-Winham
110 4.50 1.50 2♠ S ♥7 2-McCabe-Gift vs 7-Thomas-Payne
110 4.50 1.50 2♠ S ♥2 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 3-Haley-Gunter
100 3.00 3.00 2♥ E -2 ♦2 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Cowen-Brown
50 2.00 4.00 3♥ E -1 ♠4 3-Smith-Davidson vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
100 1.00 5.00 2♠ S -1 ♣K 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.00 6.00 2♥ E +1 ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
13 |
♠J6
♥T74
♦J52
♣K8632
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ -/1NT ♣5 ♦6 NT6/7 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 6.00 0.00 3♥ E -4 ♠7 3-Smith-Davidson vs 1-Cowen-Brown
300 5.00 1.00 2N E -3 ♥2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Tainty
140 4.00 2.00 3♠ S ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Gunter
100 2.00 4.00 2N E -1 ♠7 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Harken-Winham
100 2.00 4.00 4♣ E -1 ♥A 2-McCabe-Gift vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 4.00 3♣ E -1 ♠A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Thomas-Payne
200 0.00 6.00 3♠ S -2 ♣Q 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
|
14 |
♠K96
♥Q753
♦QJ8
♣864
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 6.00 0.00 2♣ S ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Gunter
50 5.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♣4 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 5-Harken-Winham
50 3.50 2.50 3♣ S -1 ♠4 2-McCabe-Gift vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.50 2.50 3♣ S -1 ♦A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Thomas-Payne
90 2.00 4.00 1N W ♥3 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
110 1.00 5.00 2♠ E ♣Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Tainty
140 0.00 6.00 2♠ E +1 ♥A 3-Smith-Davidson vs 1-Cowen-Brown
|
15 |
♠AQJ97
♥T8
♦AK9
♣JT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.33 0.67 4♠ N ♥A 3-Smith-Davidson vs 1-Cowen-Brown
620 5.33 0.67 4♠ N ♥9 2-McCabe-Gift vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
140 3.00 3.00 3♠ N ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Harken-Tainty
140 3.00 3.00 3♠ N ♥A 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
100 1.25 4.75 4♠ N -1 ♣2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Gunter
200 0.08 5.92 4♠ N -2 ♥A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 7-Thomas-Payne
|
16 |
♠A9
♥KJ54
♦KJT74
♣QT
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
430 5.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♣3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Haley-Gunter
400 3.50 2.50 3N S ♥3 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Harken-Tainty
400 3.50 2.50 3N S ♥3 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
180 2.00 4.00 2N N +2 ♣3 2-McCabe-Gift vs 5-Harken-Winham
50 0.50 5.50 3N N -1 ♥6 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 1-Cowen-Brown
50 0.50 5.50 3N N -1 ♣3 3-Smith-Davidson vs 7-Thomas-Payne
|
17 |
♠4
♥AQ643
♦T72
♣T654
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♠Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Haley-Gunter
140 5.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦K 3-Smith-Davidson vs 7-Thomas-Payne
90 4.00 2.00 2♦ S ♦K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
50 1.50 4.50 4♣ E -1 ♠Q 2-McCabe-Gift vs 5-Harken-Winham
50 1.50 4.50 4♣ E -1 ♥K 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Harken-Tainty
50 1.50 4.50 4♣ E -1 ♥K 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 1-Cowen-Brown
50 1.50 4.50 3♣ E -1 ♠Q 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠93
♥4
♦Q764
♣AQT987
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 1♥ 4♠ ♣0 ♦1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 1.00 5♠ E -1 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
50 5.00 1.00 5♠ E -1 ♦A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 4-Harken-Tainty
50 5.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♦A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Haley-Gunter
420 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♦A 2-McCabe-Gift vs 5-Harken-Winham
420 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♦A 3-Smith-Davidson vs 7-Thomas-Payne
420 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♦A 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 1-Cowen-Brown
420 1.50 4.50 4♠ E ♦K 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠A4
♥T43
♦986
♣AKJ52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥4/5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ W ♠A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Harken-Winham
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ W ♣A 2-McCabe-Gift vs 4-Harken-Tainty
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ W ♣A 3-Smith-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.00 3.00 3♦ W ♣A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Haley-Gunter
110 3.00 3.00 2♦ W +1 ♣A 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 7-Thomas-Payne
150 0.00 6.00 3♥ N -3 ♦4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
|
20 |
♠J863
♥Q83
♦KQ76
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣3/2 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.00 1.00 4♠ S ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
620 5.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥A 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Haley-Gunter
620 5.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥A 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 7-Thomas-Payne
170 2.00 4.00 3♠ S +1 ♥A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
170 2.00 4.00 3♠ S +1 ♥A 3-Smith-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.00 4.00 3♠ S +1 ♥A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Harken-Winham
100 0.00 6.00 4♠ W -1 ♠3 2-McCabe-Gift vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|
21 |
♠AKJ86
♥KQ43
♦K5
♣K7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3/2♥ 4/3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
620 5.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣2 7-Elkins-Raphael vs 7-Thomas-Payne
140 4.00 2.00 3♠ N ♣2 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Harken-Winham
100 2.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♣2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Kerner-Reuben
100 2.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♣2 3-Smith-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♣2 5-Mayer-Clouse vs 3-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -2 ♠5 2-McCabe-Gift vs 4-Harken-Tainty
|