1 |
♠J2
♥K65
♦AKJ852
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♣K 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ N +1 ♠7 1-McCabe-Walker vs 1-Benich-Benich
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♠7 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ S -2 ♣K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -4 ♣K 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
2 |
♠873
♥AJ9
♦AQ765
♣A5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ 2/3NT ♣5/6 ♥5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦J 1-McCabe-Walker vs 1-Benich-Benich
50 3.50 0.50 3♠ E -1 ♦J 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♦J 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♦J 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Haley-Gunter
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♦J 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
3 |
♠AQ4
♥7
♦QT854
♣QJ73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT3/5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♦ N ♣T 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Haley-Gunter
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -2 ♥A 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 4-Zinman-Karter
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ W +1 ♥7 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♦2 1-McCabe-Walker vs 1-Benich-Benich
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♦5 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
4 |
♠T65
♥T84
♦A962
♣Q53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥Q 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♣8 1-McCabe-Walker vs 1-Benich-Benich
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♣8 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Haley-Gunter
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♣3 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♣8 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
5 |
♠K87
♥AQJT974
♦9
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♥ 3♠ 7NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣0 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.00 1.00 5♥ N +2 ♦K 1-McCabe-Walker vs 1-Benich-Benich
710 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +3 ♦K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
710 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +3 ♦7 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 2-Haley-Gunter
680 0.50 3.50 5♥ N +1 ♠9 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 4-Zinman-Karter
680 0.50 3.50 4♥ N +2 ♦K 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
6 |
♠632
♥Q
♦K87654
♣J42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1/-♠ 1/-NT ♦4 ♠7/6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 1N W -1 ♦6 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Zinman-Karter
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦8 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Benich-Benich
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ W ♦6 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Haley-Gunter
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ E ♦8 1-McCabe-Walker vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
300 0.00 4.00 5♦* S -2 ♥T 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
7 |
♠AQJ64
♥AT6
♦K943
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥5 1-McCabe-Walker vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥5 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Zinman-Karter
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥5 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Benich-Benich
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ S ♠4 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Haley-Gunter
100 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -1 ♠T 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
8 |
♠A98
♥6532
♦A7
♣7643
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1/3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♠3 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
430 2.50 1.50 3N W +1 ♥2 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Haley-Gunter
430 2.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♦9 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Benich-Benich
460 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♠8 1-McCabe-Walker vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
460 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♣7 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
9 |
♠T76
♥92
♦KT853
♣K53
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 0.50 3N E ♠2 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Haley-Gunter
600 3.50 0.50 3N E ♥3 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♦5 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Zinman-Karter
630 1.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♣J 1-McCabe-Walker vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♦5 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Benich-Benich
|
10 |
♠Q
♥4
♦KQT4
♣AKQ8754
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♥ 5♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.88 0.13 5♣ N -3 ♦9 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 1-Benich-Benich
500 2.63 1.38 5♣* N -2 ♦9 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 2-Haley-Gunter
800 0.75 3.25 5♣* N -3 ♦9 1-McCabe-Walker vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
800 0.75 3.25 5♣* N -3 ♦9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
11 |
♠QJ4
♥A6
♦K962
♣A983
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N N ♥J 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Benich-Benich
400 3.50 0.50 3N N ♥J 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 2-Haley-Gunter
130 2.00 2.00 4♣ S ♣K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♣K 1-McCabe-Walker vs 4-Zinman-Karter
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -1 ♥K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
12 |
♠K98
♥6
♦T85432
♣Q62
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♥K 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Benich-Benich
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♣T 1-McCabe-Walker vs 4-Zinman-Karter
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♣T 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W ♥6 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 2-Haley-Gunter
180 0.00 4.00 2N E +2 ♥K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
13 |
♠-
♥Q74
♦T8654
♣AQ652
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠3 |
EW: 3♥ 4♠ ♣3 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ E ♥J 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Benich-Benich
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 ♣7 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
200 2.00 2.00 5♣ N -2 ♦6 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 2-Haley-Gunter
500 1.00 3.00 5♦* N -2 ♠A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♥J 1-McCabe-Walker vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
14 |
♠Q3
♥7
♦AKJT954
♣K83
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥0 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3/4♣ 1♦ 7♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♦A 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 2-Haley-Gunter
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ E ♦2 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Benich-Benich
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ E ♦2 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
480 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♦2 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
490 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♦A 1-McCabe-Walker vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
15 |
♠A43
♥K765
♦J865
♣A9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ W ♣A 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 1-Benich-Benich
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ W ♣A 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 2-Haley-Gunter
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♥5 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 ♥5 1-McCabe-Walker vs 4-Zinman-Karter
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 ♣A 3-Jones-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
16 |
♠Q853
♥KQJ986
♦8
♣76
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -5 ♠K 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 1-Benich-Benich
430 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠T 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Zinman-Karter
180 2.00 2.00 2N S +2 ♣T 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Haley-Gunter
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ N +2 ♠J 1-McCabe-Walker vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ N +1 ♠9 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
17 |
♠762
♥T84
♦Q974
♣Q84
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 6♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♥ E +2 ♣T 1-McCabe-Walker vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
510 3.00 1.00 4♥ E +3 ♣6 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Haley-Gunter
1010 1.50 2.50 6♥ E +1 ♦8 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
1010 1.50 2.50 6♥ E +1 ♣6 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 1-Benich-Benich
1510 0.00 4.00 7♥ E ♠8 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
18 |
♠AKQ952
♥AT5
♦Q6
♣92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♦A 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 2.50 1.50 4♦ W -1 ♠A 1-McCabe-Walker vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
50 2.50 1.50 4♦ W -1 ♠A 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Zinman-Karter
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ W ♠A 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 1-Benich-Benich
110 0.50 3.50 3♦ W ♠K 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Haley-Gunter
|
19 |
♠Q97
♥A852
♦A3
♣AKJ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠3 1-McCabe-Walker vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
460 3.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠3 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 1-Benich-Benich
430 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♥6 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
430 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♦9 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Haley-Gunter
210 0.00 4.00 1N N +4 ♠3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|
20 |
♠KQT3
♥K
♦J86
♣75432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥T 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
120 2.50 1.50 2N E ♥4 3-Jones-Henderson vs 2-Haley-Gunter
120 2.50 1.50 2N E ♥4 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 4-Zinman-Karter
600 1.00 3.00 3N E ♥5 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 1-Benich-Benich
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥4 1-McCabe-Walker vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
21 |
♠865
♥QJ
♦QJ952
♣KQ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT3/5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥J 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Benich-Benich
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ W ♦Q 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ E ♦Q 1-McCabe-Walker vs 2-Haley-Gunter
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ W +1 ♥Q 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Zinman-Karter
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ W +1 ♦5 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
22 |
♠KQ7
♥KT62
♦8752
♣Q4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ ♦2 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 2NT ♣5/6 ♥3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 ♥2 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
130 2.00 2.00 4♦ W ♣Q 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Zinman-Karter
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 ♠K 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 ♣Q 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Benich-Benich
600 0.00 4.00 5♦ W ♠K 1-McCabe-Walker vs 2-Haley-Gunter
|
23 |
♠QT4
♥K54
♦-
♣AQ76532
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♣3 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Zinman-Karter
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♠3 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Benich-Benich
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -1 ♣A 1-McCabe-Walker vs 2-Haley-Gunter
180 1.00 3.00 1N W +3 ♣6 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
200 0.00 4.00 3♣* N -1 ♠3 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
24 |
♠J873
♥AQT2
♦JT
♣AQJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1/-♥ 3♠ 3/1NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♥8 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Benich-Benich
430 2.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♥8 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
430 2.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♥6 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Zinman-Karter
430 2.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♣7 1-McCabe-Walker vs 2-Haley-Gunter
180 0.00 4.00 2N N +2 ♥8 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
|
25 |
♠KJ
♥T984
♦J93
♣QJT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.63 1.38 3N E +1 ♠6 3-Jones-Henderson vs 1-Benich-Benich
630 2.63 1.38 3N E +1 ♠6 4-Schamberg-Turnquist vs 3-Wesolowski-Reuben
630 2.63 1.38 3N E +1 ♠6 5-Reiss-Gamble vs 5-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
660 0.13 3.88 3N E +2 ♠6 2-Maggipinto-Smith vs 4-Zinman-Karter
|