1 |
♠T2
♥A875
♦AKQT
♣Q32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦6 8-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
180 1.50 1.50 2N N +2 ♥K 5-Tainty-Harken vs 6-Kremers-Downing
180 1.50 1.50 2N N +2 ♦4 3-Haley-Gunter vs 7-McCabe-Riley
100 0.00 3.00 2♦ E -2 ♠K 2-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
2 |
♠J832
♥985
♦Q72
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ S ♣7 8-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
90 2.00 1.00 1N E ♦5 3-Haley-Gunter vs 7-McCabe-Riley
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ E ♥A 2-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
110 0.50 2.50 2♠ E ♦8 5-Tainty-Harken vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
3 |
♠QT74
♥63
♦AT42
♣AQ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 1N S -1 ♥5 2-Cowen-Burk vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
50 2.50 0.50 1N N -1 ♠A 5-Tainty-Harken vs 6-Kremers-Downing
100 1.00 2.00 1N S -2 ♣T 3-Haley-Gunter vs 7-McCabe-Riley
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♦3 8-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
|
4 |
♠Q975
♥K852
♦T5
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♦T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
100 2.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♥2 8-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
120 1.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♥2 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-McCabe-Riley
200 0.00 3.00 2♠ S -2 ♣2 3-Haley-Gunter vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
5 |
♠A43
♥KQJ8
♦AT6
♣Q73
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♥ 3♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 3.00 0.00 6♥ N ♣8 3-Haley-Gunter vs 5-Tainty-Harken
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♠9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♣J 8-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
660 0.00 3.00 3N N +2 ♣J 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-McCabe-Riley
|
6 |
♠K9872
♥A
♦KT83
♣972
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠3 NT5/4 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 ♥6 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-McCabe-Riley
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
50 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♠3 8-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♥Q 3-Haley-Gunter vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
7 |
♠AK865
♥AQ874
♦-
♣KQ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4/5 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3♣ E -4 ♠Q 7-McCabe-Riley vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
200 2.00 1.00 3♦ E -2 ♠Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Kremers-Downing
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♦K 5-Tainty-Harken vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♦K 8-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
8 |
♠KQJ85
♥AT965
♦5
♣52
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥6/5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 5♦ E -3 ♥2 5-Tainty-Harken vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 2.00 1.00 5♣ W -2 ♠K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Kremers-Downing
50 1.00 2.00 4♣ W -1 ♠K 8-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Haley-Gunter
150 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -3 ♣A 7-McCabe-Riley vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
|
9 |
♠J
♥KT92
♦T842
♣T652
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Kremers-Downing
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♠J 7-McCabe-Riley vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
600 1.00 2.00 3N E ♣4 5-Tainty-Harken vs 2-Cowen-Burk
630 0.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♣4 8-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
10 |
♠QT7
♥K83
♦A974
♣732
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♥ 5NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.50 0.50 5♥ S +1 ♠A 8-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
680 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♠A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Haley-Gunter
230 0.50 2.50 3♥ S +3 ♦2 5-Tainty-Harken vs 7-McCabe-Riley
230 0.50 2.50 2♥ S +4 ♠A 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
11 |
♠43
♥QT3
♦AKQJ832
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♦ N -1 ♥A 5-Tainty-Harken vs 7-McCabe-Riley
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -2 ♣A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Haley-Gunter
100 1.00 2.00 5♦ N -2 ♥A 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 1.00 2.00 5♦ N -2 ♥A 8-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
12 |
♠AK2
♥AT8
♦AQ7
♣9762
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 0.50 2N N +1 ♣A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Haley-Gunter
150 2.50 0.50 2N N +1 ♣A 8-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
90 1.00 2.00 1N S ♣J 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 0.00 3.00 2♣ E -1 ♦5 5-Tainty-Harken vs 7-McCabe-Riley
|
13 |
♠Q62
♥KT753
♦J987
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ E ♥A 2-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Haley-Gunter
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ E +1 ♦K 8-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Tainty-Harken
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ E ♥8 7-McCabe-Riley vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
870 0.00 3.00 2♠* E +1 ♦K 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
|
14 |
♠6
♥AQJ98
♦AQT87
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 6♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥1 ♠6 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♠K 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦5 7-McCabe-Riley vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠7 8-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Tainty-Harken
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ N ♣2 2-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
15 |
♠AJT65
♥Q
♦A8762
♣64
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/4♥ 4♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣5 ♦7/6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦K 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Raphael-Elkins
200 1.50 1.50 2♥ S +3 ♦3 7-McCabe-Riley vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
200 1.50 1.50 2♥ S +3 ♦3 8-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Tainty-Harken
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ N ♣7 2-Cowen-Burk vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
16 |
♠K93
♥64
♦T953
♣Q852
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 4♣ S ♠A 3-Haley-Gunter vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
110 1.50 1.50 3♦ S ♠A 8-Smith-Kerner vs 6-Kremers-Downing
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ N ♠6 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 5-Tainty-Harken
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♠Q 7-McCabe-Riley vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
17 |
♠AT8
♥A96
♦AKT92
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5/6 ♥4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ N ♣A 3-Haley-Gunter vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
50 2.00 1.00 3♦ N -1 ♣A 7-McCabe-Riley vs 2-Cowen-Burk
110 0.50 2.50 3♣ E ♦6 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 5-Tainty-Harken
110 0.50 2.50 3♣ E ♦3 8-Smith-Kerner vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
18 |
♠AKQ65
♥J62
♦75
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
EW: 2/3♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥A 8-Smith-Kerner vs 6-Kremers-Downing
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦K 7-McCabe-Riley vs 2-Cowen-Burk
200 1.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 ♦A 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 5-Tainty-Harken
300 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -3 ♦K 3-Haley-Gunter vs 4-Ficarrotta-Walker
|
19 |
♠J85
♥95
♦987532
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ W ♥5 8-Smith-Kerner vs 7-McCabe-Riley
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ E ♥A 2-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Kremers-Downing
660 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♦9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Tainty-Harken
660 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♦5 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
20 |
♠62
♥AKQT8
♦A97
♣Q32
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N W -6 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Tainty-Harken
400 2.00 1.00 4♣ E -4 ♥4 2-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Kremers-Downing
120 1.00 2.00 2N N ♣7 8-Smith-Kerner vs 7-McCabe-Riley
800 0.00 3.00 3N* N -3 ♣J 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
21 |
♠QJ432
♥8
♦KT4
♣A863
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ S ♣2 1-Raphael-Elkins vs 3-Haley-Gunter
100 2.00 1.00 2N W -2 ♥8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Tainty-Harken
200 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♦2 8-Smith-Kerner vs 7-McCabe-Riley
200 0.50 2.50 2N N -2 ♦2 2-Cowen-Burk vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|