1 |
♠Q7
♥J974
♦AK4
♣KJT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 3N N ♠3 2-Grant-Reiss vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
400 3.50 0.50 3N N ♦2 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Nelson-Winham
210 2.00 2.00 2N N +3 ♠3 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 1.00 3.00 1N N +2 ♥6 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Walker-McCabe
110 0.00 4.00 2♣ N +1 ♦T 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 2-Benich-Benich
|
2 |
♠QJ
♥T6
♦K732
♣K8653
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣5 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 2-Benich-Benich
90 3.00 1.00 1N W ♣5 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Walker-McCabe
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 ♦2 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Nelson-Winham
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♠Q 2-Grant-Reiss vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ W ♣5 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
3 |
♠AQJ93
♥A86
♦T
♣KQ54
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2/3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♠7 2-Grant-Reiss vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
420 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♦A 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Walker-McCabe
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♠7 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Nelson-Winham
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♦A 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 2-Benich-Benich
50 0.50 3.50 3♣ N -1 ♦J 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
4 |
♠A843
♥AT985
♦8752
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ -/1NT ♥5/6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
730 4.00 0.00 3♥* N ♠Q 2-Grant-Reiss vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
200 3.00 1.00 4♥ S -2 ♦K 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Walker-McCabe
300 1.50 2.50 4♥ N -3 ♦A 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 2-Benich-Benich
300 1.50 2.50 2♣ S -3 ♠9 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Nelson-Winham
400 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -4 ♠Q 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
5 |
♠KQ7
♥K3
♦KT
♣K86532
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6/5 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 2♣ N ♥J 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 1-Smith-Smith
90 3.50 0.50 2♣ N ♥J 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 2-Benich-Benich
100 2.00 2.00 3♣ N -1 ♠8 2-Grant-Reiss vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♣9 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 4-Nelson-Winham
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♣7 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 5-Walker-McCabe
|
6 |
♠KJT64
♥K865
♦98
♣83
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 1NT ♦7/6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♣J 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 5-Walker-McCabe
90 3.00 1.00 1N E ♦Q 2-Grant-Reiss vs 2-Benich-Benich
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ S -2 ♠3 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 0.50 3.50 1N E +2 ♦6 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Nelson-Winham
150 0.50 3.50 1N E +2 ♦5 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
7 |
♠5
♥A2
♦J9763
♣QT985
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ N ♠A 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Nelson-Winham
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♥A 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♠A 2-Grant-Reiss vs 2-Benich-Benich
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W ♥A 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 5-Walker-McCabe
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♥A 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
8 |
♠AKJ8
♥AQJT
♦5
♣AJ54
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥5 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Nelson-Winham
400 3.00 1.00 5♣ S ♥5 2-Grant-Reiss vs 2-Benich-Benich
150 1.50 2.50 4♣ S +1 ♣K 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 1.50 2.50 3♣ S +2 ♠5 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ S +1 ♥5 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 5-Walker-McCabe
|
9 |
♠K8
♥KJ765
♦32
♣J643
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1/2♥ ♠3/4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦3 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Nelson-Winham
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ W ♦3 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 1-Smith-Smith
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♦3 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 5-Walker-McCabe
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♦3 2-Grant-Reiss vs 2-Benich-Benich
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♦3 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
10 |
♠J8752
♥AK98
♦5
♣K83
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 1N E -2 ♣4 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
200 3.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 ♠K 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 1-Smith-Smith
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♦K 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 5-Walker-McCabe
140 0.50 3.50 1♠ N +2 ♦K 2-Grant-Reiss vs 2-Benich-Benich
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ N +1 ♣Q 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 4-Nelson-Winham
|
11 |
♠KQ4
♥J863
♦AK6
♣864
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6/7 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♥7 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 5-Walker-McCabe
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ E -2 ♠9 2-Grant-Reiss vs 1-Smith-Smith
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♣T 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 ♣A 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Benich-Benich
100 0.00 4.00 1N N -2 ♣5 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 4-Nelson-Winham
|
12 |
♠KQJ972
♥T985
♦8
♣A7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
870 4.00 0.00 2♠* N +1 ♥A 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 5-Walker-McCabe
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♠K 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♠4 2-Grant-Reiss vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 1.00 3.00 2N N +1 ♠Q 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Benich-Benich
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ N -2 ♠5 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 4-Nelson-Winham
|
13 |
♠764
♥T4
♦654
♣AKJ75
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 1♠ E +2 ♦J 2-Grant-Reiss vs 1-Smith-Smith
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ W ♣A 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 4-Nelson-Winham
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +2 ♦J 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 5-Walker-McCabe
200 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +3 ♠7 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Benich-Benich
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♦J 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
14 |
♠94
♥KJ83
♦2
♣QT7642
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♣9 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Benich-Benich
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣9 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣9 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 5-Walker-McCabe
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ E ♣9 2-Grant-Reiss vs 1-Smith-Smith
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ E +1 ♣9 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 4-Nelson-Winham
|
15 |
♠K94
♥98
♦JT863
♣762
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 ♠4 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 3.00 1.00 1N S -1 ♣A 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 2-Benich-Benich
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ W ♥9 2-Grant-Reiss vs 1-Smith-Smith
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ W ♦J 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 5-Walker-McCabe
130 0.00 4.00 3♣ W +1 ♦J 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 4-Nelson-Winham
|
16 |
♠A43
♥KQJ
♦QJT93
♣85
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +2 ♦Q 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Smith-Smith
300 3.00 1.00 4♦* N -2 ♠5 2-Grant-Reiss vs 5-Walker-McCabe
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥K 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥K 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Benich-Benich
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♦Q 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 4-Nelson-Winham
|
17 |
♠Q
♥KQT9864
♦Q6
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ -/1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2♥ N -1 ♠T 2-Grant-Reiss vs 5-Walker-McCabe
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 ♦A 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ E ♥7 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Benich-Benich
130 1.50 2.50 4♣ E ♥7 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 4-Nelson-Winham
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ E +2 ♥5 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
18 |
♠AKQT7
♥72
♦KQ9854
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ 4NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ -/1♥ ♦0 ♥6/7 ♠1/2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥J 2-Grant-Reiss vs 5-Walker-McCabe
150 2.50 1.50 4♦ N +1 ♥A 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Smith-Smith
150 2.50 1.50 3♦ N +2 ♥A 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 4-Nelson-Winham
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♠9 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Benich-Benich
|
19 |
♠T964
♥KT642
♦62
♣65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♦ S -2 ♣9 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ S -3 ♣Q 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Benich-Benich
660 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥4 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 4-Nelson-Winham
660 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♦6 2-Grant-Reiss vs 5-Walker-McCabe
660 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♦6 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
20 |
♠AJ86
♥52
♦AJ98
♣KQJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.88 0.13 3N N +1 ♣T 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 4-Nelson-Winham
AVE+ AVE- 2.42 1.58 2-Grant-Reiss vs 5-Walker-McCabe
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ S ♠7 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 1-Smith-Smith
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ N ♣T 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 2-Benich-Benich
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ N ♣9 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
21 |
♠T32
♥J52
♦JT52
♣T64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♠ ♣4/3 ♦5/4 ♥6/5 ♠7/6 NT5/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N S +3 ♦8 2-Grant-Reiss vs 4-Nelson-Winham
150 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -3 ♣T 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ S +1 ♦8 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Smith-Smith
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♦3 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 2-Benich-Benich
300 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -3 ♦K 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Walker-McCabe
|
22 |
♠A9
♥Q62
♦KJ54
♣Q853
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 ♠4 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Smith-Smith
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S ♣4 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 2-Benich-Benich
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♣9 2-Grant-Reiss vs 4-Nelson-Winham
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♣9 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♣9 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Walker-McCabe
|
23 |
♠A2
♥KT954
♦85
♣K975
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N ♠5 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 2-Benich-Benich
100 3.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♥7 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Walker-McCabe
90 2.00 2.00 1N E ♠3 2-Grant-Reiss vs 4-Nelson-Winham
120 0.50 3.50 1N E +1 ♠3 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
120 0.50 3.50 1N E +1 ♥7 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Smith-Smith
|
24 |
♠T5
♥J8
♦K9873
♣9532
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 5♠ W -3 ♦7 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Smith-Smith
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦9 2-Grant-Reiss vs 4-Nelson-Winham
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♦7 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 2-Benich-Benich
570 1.00 3.00 2♥* E +1 ♣4 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Walker-McCabe
590 0.00 4.00 4♠* W ♦9 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|
25 |
♠AJ983
♥Q42
♦T4
♣K93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.63 1.38 3N S +1 ♥T 3-Wesolowski-Henderson vs 1-Smith-Smith
430 2.63 1.38 3N N +1 ♣Q 1-Keen-Wasserstrom vs 2-Benich-Benich
430 2.63 1.38 3N N +1 ♣Q 2-Grant-Reiss vs 4-Nelson-Winham
AVE+ NP 2.40 0.00 5-Goodell-Goodell vs 5-Walker-McCabe
50 0.13 3.88 2♠ N -1 ♥3 4-Turnquist-Schamberg vs 3-Reimnitz-Reimnitz
|