1 |
♠T95
♥T743
♦T74
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N* S ♣K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
150 3.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♦5 2-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Haley-Gunter
120 2.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♦5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
100 1.00 3.00 1N E -2 ♠4 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 5-Williams-Dean
90 0.00 4.00 1N S ♦6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
2 |
♠Q
♥AJ5
♦KT4
♣QJ9762
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♠9 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 5-Williams-Dean
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +2 ♠5 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 ♠7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 ♠2 2-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Haley-Gunter
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ S -1 ♠5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
|
3 |
♠J87643
♥942
♦2
♣J73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦0 ♥0 ♠4 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 7♦ 7♥ 3♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 3♦ E +3 ♣K 2-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Haley-Gunter
170 3.50 0.50 2♦ E +4 ♠9 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 5-Williams-Dean
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♦2 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣K 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
720 0.00 4.00 3N W +4 ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
4 |
♠32
♥AQT
♦973
♣AQJ73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 4♣ N +1 ♦8 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Perkins
150 3.50 0.50 4♣ N +1 ♦8 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥5 2-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Haley-Gunter
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ W +2 ♣A 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 5-Williams-Dean
170 0.00 4.00 3♦ W +3 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
5 |
♠KT9832
♥QJ64
♦-
♣J64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣J 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W ♠T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Williams-Dean
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♠T 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♣T 2-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
6 |
♠32
♥A982
♦T87654
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1/2♥ 2♠ 2/3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.50 0.50 2N N +2 ♠8 2-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
180 3.50 0.50 1N N +3 ♠T 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
120 1.50 2.50 1N N +1 ♠T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Williams-Dean
120 1.50 2.50 1N N +1 ♥3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Haley-Gunter
100 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -2 ♦A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
7 |
♠A2
♥AK96
♦987
♣KQ52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠T 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠5 2-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Williams-Dean
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Haley-Gunter
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ N ♠T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
8 |
♠9652
♥A32
♦J65
♣Q85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2/3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N S +3 ♠J 2-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
150 3.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♠7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Perkins
120 1.50 2.50 1N S +1 ♠7 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
120 1.50 2.50 1N S +1 ♠7 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Haley-Gunter
90 0.00 4.00 1N S ♠7 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 5-Williams-Dean
|
9 |
♠AJ5
♥K42
♦52
♣AQ985
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Cowen-Burk
150 3.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♠3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Williams-Dean
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♠4 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 3-Haley-Gunter
100 1.00 3.00 2N N -2 ♠3 2-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 1.00 3.00 1N N -2 ♠3 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
|
10 |
♠J6543
♥5
♦Q9543
♣63
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Williams-Dean
200 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♦4 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -2 ♣6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ W -1 ♠6 2-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Perkins
150 0.00 4.00 2N W +1 ♠4 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
11 |
♠J763
♥Q
♦862
♣JT964
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠0/1 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 6♥ W -3 ♣J 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 3-Haley-Gunter
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♣J 2-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Perkins
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♣J 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
430 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♦T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Williams-Dean
460 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♦7 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
12 |
♠J2
♥AJ82
♦T9642
♣T7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ W ♠2 2-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Perkins
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♦T 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 3-Haley-Gunter
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♦T 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Cowen-Burk
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♣T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
480 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♦T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Williams-Dean
|
13 |
♠J653
♥AJ73
♦Q76
♣T9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♣T 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W ♣T 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 2-Cowen-Burk
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ W ♣T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Haley-Gunter
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ W ♣T 2-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Williams-Dean
|
14 |
♠A865
♥A643
♦T83
♣Q4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣5 2-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Williams-Dean
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣T 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 0.50 3.50 6♠ S -1 ♥7 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Payne-Perkins
50 0.50 3.50 5♠ S -1 ♣5 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
15 |
♠T
♥JT7632
♦T
♣KT852
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♥ 6♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.00 0.00 2♠ E +4 ♥Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Haley-Gunter
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♦9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♦2 2-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Williams-Dean
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +2 ♦2 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Payne-Perkins
490 0.00 4.00 3N E +3 ♦9 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
16 |
♠A962
♥T854
♦AQJ7
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♣6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Payne-Perkins
400 2.00 2.00 3N S ♠3 2-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Williams-Dean
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣6 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 3-Haley-Gunter
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣6 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
17 |
♠Q843
♥3
♦JT87
♣AQJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♥8 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
150 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -3 ♠6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Williams-Dean
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ S ♥8 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ S +1 ♥T 2-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
100 0.00 4.00 1N E -2 ♠6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Gunter
|
18 |
♠KQ8
♥AK6
♦9843
♣Q75
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6/5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 ♠J 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Williams-Dean
80 3.00 1.00 1♠ S ♥T 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♦9 2-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
120 1.00 3.00 2N W ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 2♦ N -2 ♠A 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
19 |
♠T8
♥KQT5
♦JT853
♣83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3/4 NT5/6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠A 2-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ S +1 ♠A 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ S +1 ♠A 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ S ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Gunter
50 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -1 ♠A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Williams-Dean
|
20 |
♠T987
♥AQ7
♦J5
♣K987
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5/4 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ E ♠Q 1-Wesolowski-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ E ♠Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Haley-Gunter
110 3.00 1.00 1♥ E +1 ♦T 3-Winham-Millslagle vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♦7 2-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Raphael-Lohnberg
140 0.50 3.50 1♥ E +2 ♠Q 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Williams-Dean
|