1 |
♠KJ2
♥T94
♦QT3
♣A965
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♣ S -1 ♣3 3-Llacera-Walker vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ W ♦3 2-Hill-Smyth vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
140 0.50 1.50 3♠ W ♣A 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
|
2 |
♠AJ7
♥54
♦KQ854
♣AQ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5/6 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 3/4♠ 3/4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ E ♦7 3-Llacera-Walker vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
500 1.00 1.00 1N* N -2 ♠K 2-Hill-Smyth vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
800 0.00 2.00 3♦* N -3 ♣4 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
|
3 |
♠KQ8
♥KQ64
♦754
♣843
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4/3 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥J 2-Hill-Smyth vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
400 0.50 1.50 3N S ♠T 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
400 0.50 1.50 3♠ E -4 ♠4 3-Llacera-Walker vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
|
4 |
♠J85
♥AQ743
♦QJ97
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 4♥ N -1 ♠7 3-Llacera-Walker vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
100 1.50 0.50 4♥ N -1 ♠7 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ W +3 ♦Q 2-Hill-Smyth vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
|
5 |
♠AQ54
♥KQ
♦AKJ7
♣AK6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠6 2-Hill-Smyth vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♦T 3-Llacera-Walker vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
630 0.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♥2 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
|
6 |
♠J
♥AQ72
♦J32
♣KT972
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4/5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N E +1 ♠5 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
150 0.50 1.50 1N E +2 ♠5 3-Llacera-Walker vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
150 0.50 1.50 1N E +2 ♠5 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 2-Hill-Smyth
|
7 |
♠QJ9875
♥8
♦K6
♣AK96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♦4 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♣J 3-Llacera-Walker vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
100 0.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♦3 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 2-Hill-Smyth
|
8 |
♠Q952
♥9
♦AT976
♣Q62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 5♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 6♥ W -1 ♠2 3-Llacera-Walker vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
450 0.50 1.50 5♥ W ♠2 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 2-Hill-Smyth
450 0.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♠2 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
|
9 |
♠72
♥KT742
♦J876
♣82
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ E +1 ♠T 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 2-Hill-Smyth
170 1.00 1.00 1♠ W +3 ♣8 3-Llacera-Walker vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥4 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
|
10 |
♠T864
♥KJ4
♦85
♣JT94
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2/1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♣J 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
100 1.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♣J 3-Llacera-Walker vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ W ♣J 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 2-Hill-Smyth
|
11 |
♠AT92
♥T9863
♦-
♣J764
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♣3 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
80 1.00 1.00 1♠ N ♠4 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 3-Llacera-Walker
50 0.00 2.00 2♦ S -1 ♣3 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 2-Hill-Smyth
|
12 |
♠-
♥QJ962
♦QJ82
♣QJ96
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 6♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +2 ♥Q 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +2 ♥Q 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 3-Llacera-Walker
480 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +2 ♣J 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 2-Hill-Smyth
|
13 |
♠63
♥KQ8
♦K8642
♣QJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥2 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ 7♠ 5NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ E +1 ♦Q 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
710 0.50 1.50 5♠ E +2 ♦Q 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 3-Llacera-Walker
710 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +3 ♦Q 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 2-Hill-Smyth
|
14 |
♠A87432
♥2
♦QJT82
♣A
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -1 ♦8 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 3-Llacera-Walker
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 2-Hill-Smyth
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♦7 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
|
15 |
♠KQ62
♥T4
♦AK3
♣AK76
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ -/1♦ 4/5♠ 1NT ♦6/7 ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥A 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 2-Hill-Smyth
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥A 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥A 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 3-Llacera-Walker
|
16 |
♠854
♥T7
♦K542
♣AK75
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♣6 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 3-Llacera-Walker
50 1.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 ♥8 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ E ♣6 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 2-Hill-Smyth
|
17 |
♠9865
♥A85
♦A8
♣7654
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1/2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.50 0.50 2N S ♠3 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 2-Hill-Smyth
120 1.50 0.50 2N S ♠3 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠3 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 3-Llacera-Walker
|
18 |
♠J73
♥AK9
♦K6
♣AQ982
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.00 1.00 5♠ S +1 ♥T 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
680 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♠9 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 2-Hill-Smyth
680 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♥4 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 3-Llacera-Walker
|
19 |
♠AQT542
♥3
♦J5
♣A654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥A 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 2-Hill-Smyth
50 1.00 1.00 5♠ S -1 ♣J 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 3-Llacera-Walker
150 0.00 2.00 6♠ S -3 ♣J 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
|
20 |
♠AK5
♥QJT4
♦96
♣A432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 ♠A 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 4-MacGregor-Slinger
100 1.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♥J 1-Maggipinto-Gamble vs 3-Llacera-Walker
630 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥Q 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer vs 2-Hill-Smyth
|
21 |
♠J842
♥JT9
♦A986
♣Q9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5/4♦ 2♥ 5/3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 5♣ E +1 ♠A 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
460 0.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♠2 2-Hill-Smyth vs 3-Llacera-Walker
460 0.50 1.50 3N W +2 ♠2 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
|
22 |
♠Q63
♥984
♦T87
♣8752
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♥K 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
100 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♥Q 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ S -4 ♣A 2-Hill-Smyth vs 3-Llacera-Walker
|
23 |
♠A43
♥AK62
♦2
♣KQ965
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3/2 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥5 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
600 1.00 1.00 3N N ♠J 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
130 0.00 2.00 2♦ S +2 ♥8 2-Hill-Smyth vs 3-Llacera-Walker
|
24 |
♠84
♥K3
♦Q53
♣AQ8654
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♣9 2-Hill-Smyth vs 3-Llacera-Walker
50 1.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♣8 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣A 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
|
25 |
♠AT7
♥QJ863
♦Q
♣T863
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/2 ♦1 ♥6/5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 4♣ 6♦ 1♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 5♦ E +1 ♠8 6-Wasserstrom-Faircrest vs 5-Peterson-Oppenheimer
660 1.00 1.00 3N E +2 ♥2 2-Hill-Smyth vs 3-Llacera-Walker
1370 0.00 2.00 6♦ E ♦4 4-MacGregor-Slinger vs 1-Maggipinto-Gamble
|