1 |
♠T63
♥42
♦762
♣J9763
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥4 3-Harken-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥4 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♥4 1-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♥5 5-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Haley-Gunter
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
|
2 |
♠J3
♥AQ984
♦AJ42
♣Q6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠3 |
EW: 2♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♠A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
230 2.00 2.00 3♥ N +3 ♦6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
150 1.00 3.00 4♠ W -3 ♥4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Haley-Gunter
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ W -1 ♣Q 3-Harken-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
3 |
♠QJ976543
♥K7
♦KQ
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3♠* N +1 ♦8 3-Harken-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♦2 5-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Haley-Gunter
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♦J 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ N +1 ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ N +1 ♦8 1-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
|
4 |
♠K9
♥AKQJ
♦KJ95
♣A76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠6/5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2N N -1 ♣9 2-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ N -1 ♣9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Cowen-Burk
200 1.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♣8 5-Smith-Kerner vs 4-Haley-Gunter
200 1.50 2.50 4♦ S -2 ♠T 1-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
300 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♣Q 3-Harken-Osborn vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠AQ9
♥T7
♦9
♣AQT9763
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ N +1 ♥5 3-Harken-Osborn vs 4-Haley-Gunter
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 ♥6 5-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
200 0.50 3.50 3♦ S -2 ♥2 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.50 3.50 5♣ N -2 ♦2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
6 |
♠KT9
♥AJT7
♦KT3
♣864
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥7/6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1/2♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 ♠9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
100 3.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 ♦3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Burk
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ W ♣4 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.50 3.50 2♣ W +1 ♦3 3-Harken-Osborn vs 4-Haley-Gunter
110 0.50 3.50 2♣ W +1 ♣4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
|
7 |
♠Q
♥J943
♦QJ32
♣Q764
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 6♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ W ♥3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
680 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +2 ♥3 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
680 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +2 ♦Q 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Burk
710 0.50 3.50 5♠ W +2 ♣4 3-Harken-Osborn vs 4-Haley-Gunter
710 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +3 ♥3 5-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
|
8 |
♠A72
♥JT96
♦AT
♣Q953
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1/2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 1N N +2 ♥8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
150 3.50 0.50 3♠ W -3 ♣A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ S +2 ♥A 5-Smith-Kerner vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
PASS 0.50 3.50 Pass Out 2-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Cowen-Burk
PASS 0.50 3.50 Pass Out 3-Harken-Osborn vs 4-Haley-Gunter
|
9 |
♠Q8
♥98
♦AJ7652
♣543
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4/5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠3 3-Harken-Osborn vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
100 3.50 0.50 2N E -1 ♦9 5-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♣T 1-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Haley-Gunter
90 1.00 3.00 1N E ♠3 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
100 0.00 4.00 2♦ N -2 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
10 |
♠98
♥AT96
♦A75
♣KJ54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 1N E -2 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.50 0.50 2♦ E -2 ♠A 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
90 2.00 2.00 1N E ♠A 3-Harken-Osborn vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
120 1.00 3.00 1N E +1 ♠A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♦9 5-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
11 |
♠852
♥74
♦Q53
♣AKQ85
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ S -2 ♣4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♣J 5-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
150 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -3 ♦K 3-Harken-Osborn vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♣A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Haley-Gunter
|
12 |
♠7
♥64
♦AKQJ973
♣T85
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1/-♥ 2/1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥7/6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
630 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥T 5-Smith-Kerner vs 2-Cowen-Burk
600 2.00 2.00 3N S ♣2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
100 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♦6 1-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Haley-Gunter
100 0.50 3.50 3♦ N -1 ♣6 3-Harken-Osborn vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
|
13 |
♠KQ32
♥Q8
♦J92
♣A965
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -2 ♠K 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Haley-Gunter
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ N ♥6 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
110 1.50 2.50 3♣ N ♥4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ W -1 ♠K 3-Harken-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
14 |
♠8
♥J972
♦643
♣T6432
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 5/4♦ 3/2♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 6♠ W -1 ♠8 3-Harken-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
230 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +4 ♣3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Haley-Gunter
450 2.00 2.00 5♠ W ♣2 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♦4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
1210 0.00 4.00 6♠* W ♣T 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠AT43
♥AQ6
♦J52
♣AK9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 7♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦0 ♥5 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 3.50 0.50 3N N +4 ♣4 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
720 3.50 0.50 3N N +4 ♣4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
690 2.00 2.00 3N N +3 ♣5 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
660 1.00 3.00 3N N +2 ♥5 3-Harken-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
170 0.00 4.00 4♦ S +2 ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Haley-Gunter
|
16 |
♠K763
♥A2
♦9
♣K97542
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♦2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣A 1-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S ♣A 5-Smith-Kerner vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
200 0.50 3.50 3♠ S +2 ♣A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Haley-Gunter
200 0.50 3.50 2♠ S +3 ♣A 3-Harken-Osborn vs 2-Cowen-Burk
|
17 |
♠KQJT
♥A95
♦764
♣A93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S ♥6 3-Harken-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♥6 1-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Cowen-Burk
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♣2 5-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♥2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Haley-Gunter
|
18 |
♠QJ9
♥AT32
♦K85
♣Q76
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♥2 1-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Cowen-Burk
80 3.00 1.00 1♠ W ♣7 3-Harken-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
90 1.50 2.50 1N E ♠2 5-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
90 1.50 2.50 1N E ♥7 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Haley-Gunter
100 0.00 4.00 1N S -1 ♠7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
|
19 |
♠JT64
♥964
♦632
♣Q93
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥0 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 7♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2N E +2 ♦J 3-Harken-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
630 3.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♥2 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Haley-Gunter
660 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♠J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
660 1.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♦4 1-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Cowen-Burk
720 0.00 4.00 3N W +4 ♠4 5-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠QJ
♥AJ963
♦K753
♣83
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ -/1NT ♦5/6 ♥6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♣6 1-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Cowen-Burk
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♣8 3-Harken-Osborn vs 1-Payne-Norbosh
150 2.00 2.00 2N W +1 ♠Q 5-Smith-Kerner vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.50 3.50 2♦ N -2 ♣7 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Lohnberg-Raphael
200 0.50 3.50 2♦ N -2 ♣6 2-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Haley-Gunter
|