1 |
♠Q86
♥A5
♦J8653
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 4♥ W -1 ♦5 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W ♦5 6-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Smith-Suddards
460 0.33 3.67 3N W +2 ♦5 7-Keen-McDuff vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
2 |
♠T984
♥JT65
♦7
♣A865
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.25 0.75 4♠ S +2 ♥2 7-Keen-McDuff vs 3-Harken-Harken
680 3.25 0.75 4♠ S +2 ♦2 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
650 0.75 3.25 4♠ S +1 ♥2 6-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Smith-Suddards
650 0.75 3.25 4♠ S +1 ♥2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Zinman-Karter
|
3 |
♠96
♥A2
♦AQT94
♣KQ86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♠ S +1 ♣3 6-Burke-Reuben vs 5-Smith-Suddards
420 1.38 2.63 4♠ S ♣3 7-Keen-McDuff vs 3-Harken-Harken
420 1.38 2.63 4♠ S ♣3 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
420 1.38 2.63 4♠ S ♣3 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 8-Zinman-Karter
|
4 |
♠Q3
♥QT93
♦A95
♣9753
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.25 0.75 3N E -2 ♥3 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
200 3.25 0.75 3N E -2 ♥2 5-Smith-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
130 1.38 2.63 3♣ W +1 ♦A 8-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Evenden-Hill
660 0.13 3.88 3N E +2 ♦T 7-Keen-McDuff vs 6-Burke-Reuben
|
5 |
♠T2
♥J753
♦K9542
♣54
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥4 ♠0 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 1♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.25 0.75 4♠ W +2 ♥7 8-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Evenden-Hill
480 3.25 0.75 4♠ W +2 ♣5 7-Keen-McDuff vs 6-Burke-Reuben
510 1.38 2.63 5♠ W +2 ♠2 5-Smith-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
1010 0.13 3.88 6♠ W +1 ♦2 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
6 |
♠AT73
♥32
♦9842
♣875
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 1N S -2 ♠2 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 3-Harken-Harken
100 3.25 0.75 1N* S -1 ♠2 7-Keen-McDuff vs 6-Burke-Reuben
150 0.75 3.25 2N E +1 ♣7 8-Zinman-Karter vs 4-Evenden-Hill
150 0.75 3.25 1N S -3 ♠2 5-Smith-Suddards vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
7 |
♠AQ43
♥A5
♦JT72
♣Q75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.88 0.13 3N S +1 ♣5 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
600 1.38 2.63 3N S ♠9 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Hill
600 1.38 2.63 3N S ♠9 6-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Harken-Harken
600 1.38 2.63 3N S ♠9 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Smith-Suddards
|
8 |
♠T86
♥T53
♦7652
♣AT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 6♠ 5NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♠ E +1 ♦Q 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Smith-Suddards
480 1.38 2.63 4♠ E +2 ♦Q 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Hill
480 1.38 2.63 4♠ E +2 ♦Q 6-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Harken-Harken
480 1.38 2.63 4♠ E +2 ♦Q 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
|
9 |
♠A542
♥T52
♦T93
♣K98
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3/4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3N E -2 ♦2 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 5-Smith-Suddards
100 2.63 1.38 3N W -1 ♥T 6-Burke-Reuben vs 3-Harken-Harken
600 0.75 3.25 3N W ♥2 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 4-Evenden-Hill
600 0.75 3.25 3N E ♦2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
|
10 |
♠QT5
♥A76
♦T843
♣KQ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.25 0.75 1♣ E -3 ♦Q 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 8-Zinman-Karter
300 3.25 0.75 1♣ E -3 ♦Q 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
140 1.38 2.63 1♠ S +2 ♠7 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Burke-Reuben
120 0.13 3.88 1N S +1 ♥Q 7-Keen-McDuff vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
11 |
♠KT5
♥8632
♦984
♣T32
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣0 ♦5 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♠5 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
450 2.00 2.00 5♥ W ♠5 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Burke-Reuben
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠K 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 8-Zinman-Karter
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠5 7-Keen-McDuff vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
12 |
♠QJ742
♥A87
♦J42
♣87
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ -/1♦ -/1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6/7 ♦6/7 ♥6/7 |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.88 0.13 1N S +1 ♦K 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 8-Zinman-Karter
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ N ♦9 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 6-Burke-Reuben
50 1.38 2.63 2♦ W -1 ♠Q 7-Keen-McDuff vs 4-Evenden-Hill
100 0.13 3.88 3♠ N -1 ♦9 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
|
13 |
♠Q
♥K84
♦A72
♣AQJ765
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1/2♥ 4/3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1/2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥6 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
600 3.00 1.00 3N S ♣T 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Harken
150 2.00 2.00 4♣ N +1 ♦T 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Keen-McDuff
100 1.00 3.00 6N N -1 ♥6 4-Evenden-Hill vs 6-Burke-Reuben
200 0.00 4.00 6♣ N -2 ♥A 8-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Smith-Suddards
|
14 |
♠KQ876
♥73
♦73
♣KQ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT5/4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4/3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♦3 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ N -2 ♥5 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Keen-McDuff
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W ♦7 8-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Smith-Suddards
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♦7 4-Evenden-Hill vs 6-Burke-Reuben
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♦7 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
15 |
♠82
♥AT84
♦T5
♣AT986
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2NT ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 0.50 5♥ S ♠A 4-Evenden-Hill vs 6-Burke-Reuben
650 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♥2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 3-Harken-Harken
300 2.00 2.00 4♠* W -2 ♥A 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 7-Keen-McDuff
100 1.00 3.00 4♠* W -1 ♥A 8-Zinman-Karter vs 5-Smith-Suddards
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
16 |
♠Q7
♥A872
♦T9743
♣Q3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♦A 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♦A 5-Smith-Suddards vs 7-Keen-McDuff
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ N ♥J 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Burke-Reuben
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ N ♦A 3-Harken-Harken vs 8-Zinman-Karter
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♥9 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
17 |
♠AT5
♥J8
♦AQ8
♣JT852
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ E ♣3 5-Smith-Suddards vs 7-Keen-McDuff
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ E ♣3 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ E +1 ♣3 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Evenden-Hill
150 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -3 ♠3 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Burke-Reuben
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♣3 3-Harken-Harken vs 8-Zinman-Karter
|
18 |
♠AT865
♥Q2
♦AKJ9
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♦3 3-Harken-Harken vs 8-Zinman-Karter
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +2 ♥5 5-Smith-Suddards vs 7-Keen-McDuff
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N ♣A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 4-Evenden-Hill
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♦3 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 ♣2 9-Rodgers-Feldstein vs 6-Burke-Reuben
|
19 |
♠J952
♥QJ94
♦7
♣JT92
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦A 4-Evenden-Hill vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♦A 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
50 1.50 2.50 5♠ S -1 ♦A 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Keen-McDuff
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♣8 6-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Zinman-Karter
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ E ♣9 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Suddards
|
20 |
♠8742
♥JT86
♦T2
♣AJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1NT ♣6/7 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -2 ♦A 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
200 3.50 0.50 2♥ E -2 ♠Q 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Keen-McDuff
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 ♦A 4-Evenden-Hill vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 ♣6 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Suddards
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ W +1 ♥J 6-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Zinman-Karter
|
21 |
♠T32
♥QT65
♦4
♣QT982
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦2 ♥4 |
EW: 5♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +2 ♣A 4-Evenden-Hill vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♣A 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 5-Smith-Suddards
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♣A 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Wasserstrom-Smith
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ E +1 ♠Q 1-Avenmarg-Chase vs 7-Keen-McDuff
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♣A 6-Burke-Reuben vs 8-Zinman-Karter
|
22 |
♠72
♥AQJ4
♦T42
♣K432
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♦ S +3 ♠K 7-Keen-McDuff vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♠K 5-Smith-Suddards vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
50 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♠K 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Harken-Harken
50 1.50 2.50 5♦ S -1 ♠K 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Zinman-Karter
100 0.00 4.00 5♦ S -2 ♠K 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Burke-Reuben
|
23 |
♠AQJ
♥J72
♦K874
♣T75
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ -/1♠ ♦4 ♠6/7 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 ♣7 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Harken-Harken
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♦4 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Zinman-Karter
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♦4 7-Keen-McDuff vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♦4 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Burke-Reuben
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♣5 5-Smith-Suddards vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
|
24 |
♠T8762
♥K954
♦Q8
♣85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2/-NT ♣6/5 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣A 5-Smith-Suddards vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
100 3.00 1.00 4♣ S -2 ♦A 7-Keen-McDuff vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ W +1 ♣8 2-Wasserstrom-Smith vs 8-Zinman-Karter
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ W +1 ♣8 4-Evenden-Hill vs 3-Harken-Harken
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ W +1 ♣8 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 6-Burke-Reuben
|
25 |
♠KQ8
♥863
♦T64
♣AKT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 3♣ N ♥2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Keen-McDuff
50 2.63 1.38 1N S -1 ♦5 8-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
90 0.75 3.25 1N W ♣A 3-Harken-Harken vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
90 0.75 3.25 2♦ W ♣A 5-Smith-Suddards vs 4-Evenden-Hill
|
26 |
♠AQJ54
♥JT
♦QT987
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.88 0.13 4♠ N ♦2 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Keen-McDuff
170 2.63 1.38 3♠ N +1 ♦2 8-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
140 1.38 2.63 3♠ N ♣A 5-Smith-Suddards vs 4-Evenden-Hill
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -1 ♦2 3-Harken-Harken vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
|
27 |
♠T743
♥J2
♦J975
♣973
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 5♥ E -1 ♣A 8-Zinman-Karter vs 1-Avenmarg-Chase
50 2.63 1.38 3♠ S -1 ♥T 5-Smith-Suddards vs 4-Evenden-Hill
130 1.38 2.63 3♣ E +1 ♣A 3-Harken-Harken vs 9-Rodgers-Feldstein
420 0.13 3.88 4♥ E ♠8 10-Sterling-Llacera vs 7-Keen-McDuff
|