1 |
♠T987
♥T8
♦KJ8
♣A763
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥3 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥7 1-Brown-Cowen vs 1-Payne-Perkins
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♥K 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ N ♥3 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Haley-Gunter
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S +2 ♠4 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
2 |
♠K643
♥765
♦T93
♣AT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♠ ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 4♥ 1NT ♣2 ♦2 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♣ S +3 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Haley-Gunter
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ S +1 ♥A 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♣3 1-Brown-Cowen vs 1-Payne-Perkins
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♣Q 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Tainty-Harken
800 0.00 4.00 4♠* N -3 ♥4 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|
3 |
♠Q
♥AKT74
♦K2
♣96543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2♣ N -1 ♦A 1-Brown-Cowen vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ W ♥A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Tainty-Harken
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ W ♥K 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♥A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Haley-Gunter
140 0.50 3.50 2♠ W +1 ♥K 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|
4 |
♠AKQT6
♥T542
♦KQ
♣K7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♠ N ♦6 1-Brown-Cowen vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣9 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 5-Tainty-Harken
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♦4 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♣A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♣Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
5 |
♠AJ52
♥A95
♦QJ9
♣JT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Tainty-Harken
90 2.50 1.50 1N W ♣4 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Payne-Perkins
90 2.50 1.50 1N E ♦2 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
100 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 ♦4 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -1 ♣A 1-Brown-Cowen vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
6 |
♠K3
♥Q6542
♦QT7
♣A86
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♠J 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Payne-Perkins
430 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♣2 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
180 2.00 2.00 1N S +3 ♠J 1-Brown-Cowen vs 6-Haley-Gunter
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ S +1 ♠J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Tainty-Harken
110 0.00 4.00 2♦ S +1 ♠J 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|
7 |
♠AT43
♥Q74
♦732
♣JT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ W +1 ♦7 1-Brown-Cowen vs 6-Haley-Gunter
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♠3 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +2 ♣J 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
170 2.00 2.00 1♥ W +3 ♣5 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Payne-Perkins
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +3 ♣J 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
8 |
♠KQT85
♥AT3
♦853
♣Q2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N S ♦2 1-Brown-Cowen vs 6-Haley-Gunter
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S ♣A 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 1-Payne-Perkins
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♦T 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
50 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♣T 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♣8 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
9 |
♠7643
♥K75
♦T874
♣K6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/-♠ ♦3 ♥4/3 ♠7/6 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♦2 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.00 1.00 3♣ E -2 ♥J 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ S ♣A 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 1-Payne-Perkins
140 1.50 2.50 2♥ S +1 ♦2 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 6-Haley-Gunter
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ E ♠A 1-Brown-Cowen vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
10 |
♠943
♥T73
♦KQJ
♣9864
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣1 ♦4 ♥0 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 7♥ 6NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ E +2 ♣5 1-Brown-Cowen vs 5-Tainty-Harken
710 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +3 ♠K 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 6-Haley-Gunter
710 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +3 ♣5 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 1-Payne-Perkins
1460 0.50 3.50 6♥ E +1 ♠K 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
1460 0.50 3.50 6♥ E +1 ♣5 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
11 |
♠A95
♥QT9652
♦AJ3
♣4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣4 ♠6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣2 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 6-Haley-Gunter
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠3 1-Brown-Cowen vs 5-Tainty-Harken
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♣2 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 1-Payne-Perkins
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♣2 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♣2 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
|
12 |
♠653
♥J2
♦Q53
♣AJ643
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S ♦9 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♦9 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 6-Haley-Gunter
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ S -1 ♣2 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ E ♥T 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 ♦7 1-Brown-Cowen vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
13 |
♠43
♥542
♦K85
♣KJ982
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦5/4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
210 3.00 1.00 2N N +3 ♦7 1-Brown-Cowen vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +3 ♥A 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 6-Haley-Gunter
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♦A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 ♣6 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
14 |
♠A82
♥5
♦Q876
♣AKQT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ S +2 ♠4 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
120 3.00 1.00 2N N ♠4 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 6-Haley-Gunter
110 2.00 2.00 2♣ N +1 ♦A 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Payne-Perkins
100 1.00 3.00 2♦ E -2 ♣6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
50 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♥7 1-Brown-Cowen vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠KQJ74
♥K
♦AK2
♣Q753
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♥Q 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
620 3.50 0.50 4♠ N ♣A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ N +2 ♥Q 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 6-Haley-Gunter
200 1.50 2.50 3♠ N +2 ♣4 1-Brown-Cowen vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ N +1 ♥Q 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
16 |
♠JT4
♥98643
♦64
♣JT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ S -4 ♦3 1-Brown-Cowen vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
600 3.00 1.00 3N W ♥3 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ W ♥4 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 1-Payne-Perkins
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ W ♦6 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 6-Haley-Gunter
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♦6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|
17 |
♠KT98
♥Q
♦K76
♣QT543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥6 1-Brown-Cowen vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
50 3.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♦A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Payne-Perkins
120 0.50 3.50 2N E ♥6 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
120 0.50 3.50 2N E ♥6 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
18 |
♠KQJ764
♥9
♦753
♣T82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♠A 1-Brown-Cowen vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ E ♠A 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♦Q 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Tainty-Harken
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♠A 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♠A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Payne-Perkins
|
19 |
♠Q73
♥K5
♦QJ976
♣A82
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2N E -1 ♥6 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 ♠T 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Payne-Perkins
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W ♦Q 1-Brown-Cowen vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ W ♠3 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 ♦Q 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
20 |
♠QJ3
♥A63
♦J7
♣AKQ86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.50 0.50 1N N +3 ♥T 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Payne-Perkins
180 3.50 0.50 1N N +3 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ N ♠2 1-Brown-Cowen vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
130 1.00 3.00 3♣ N +1 ♠7 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W ♣A 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 5-Tainty-Harken
|
21 |
♠A9764
♥93
♦J5
♣QJ83
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6/5 ♠5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 ♣9 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
50 3.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 ♣9 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Tainty-Harken
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♣9 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♠3 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♣5 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
22 |
♠984
♥K6
♦8764
♣AKT9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣2 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Tainty-Harken
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♦T 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ S ♥9 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Haley-Gunter
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♥9 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♦T 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
23 |
♠T975
♥K74
♦987
♣KQ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 3/4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4/5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 4.00 0.00 2N W +3 ♠5 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
630 3.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠5 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
660 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♠T 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Tainty-Harken
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♥2 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣8 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Haley-Gunter
|
24 |
♠72
♥AK5
♦KJ96
♣JT63
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠3 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 ♠K 6-Cirillo-Beiers vs 6-Haley-Gunter
50 2.50 1.50 5♦ S -1 ♠4 2-Millslagle-Kovats vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 1.50 5♦ S -1 ♠4 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Tainty-Harken
100 0.50 3.50 5♦* N -1 ♠K 4-Ficarrotta-Walker vs 2-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.50 3.50 5♦* N -1 ♠K 5-Clouse-Mayer vs 4-Burke-Wesolowski
|